A regional perspective on poverty in Myanmar - United Nations ...
A regional perspective on poverty in Myanmar - United Nations ...
A regional perspective on poverty in Myanmar - United Nations ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Poverty <strong>in</strong> <strong>Myanmar</strong> 9<br />
Figure 4: Poverty gaps <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stant MMK 2005 and 2010<br />
Total<br />
Yang<strong>on</strong><br />
Tan<strong>in</strong>thayi<br />
Shan (East)<br />
Shan (North)<br />
Shan (South)<br />
Saga<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Rakh<strong>in</strong>e<br />
M<strong>on</strong><br />
Mandalay<br />
Magwe<br />
Kay<strong>in</strong><br />
Kayah<br />
Kach<strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong><br />
Bago (West)<br />
Bago (East)<br />
Ayeyarwady<br />
49238<br />
73653<br />
41121<br />
67983<br />
65906<br />
42399<br />
68142<br />
59426<br />
43441<br />
74198<br />
41897<br />
70246<br />
52582<br />
72040<br />
45774<br />
69564<br />
51959<br />
71471<br />
41761<br />
70474<br />
45294<br />
39492<br />
29808<br />
56363<br />
75092<br />
53675<br />
34098<br />
52542<br />
42786<br />
63686<br />
47373<br />
88349<br />
85217<br />
94412<br />
106419<br />
135848<br />
2005, <strong>in</strong> 2010 prices 2010<br />
The average shortfall (at Uni<strong>on</strong> level) of 60,184 was more or less equivalent to 30 days of <strong>in</strong>come per<br />
year (at 2,000 Kyat per day). This does first not appear unachievable to solve, if compared to India’s<br />
100 days programme. But it has to be seen <strong>on</strong> a per pers<strong>on</strong> level and needs to be adjusted to<br />
workdays per household member who can work (ec<strong>on</strong>omic dependency ratio).<br />
Adjusted <strong>poverty</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es and gaps<br />
Poverty can be reduced by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>come of the poor, or by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the cost of goods and<br />
services they c<strong>on</strong>sume. It must be noted that a fixed m<strong>on</strong>etary <strong>poverty</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e could quickly lead to the<br />
assumpti<strong>on</strong> that <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>creases of poor households can reduce <strong>poverty</strong>. This, however, is by<br />
no means the case: <strong>poverty</strong> is multi-facetted, and a poor household does not care about the absolute<br />
amount of <strong>in</strong>come he receives, but about the purchase power of this <strong>in</strong>come.<br />
There are <str<strong>on</strong>g>regi<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> disparities <strong>in</strong> the purchase power of households, which are not sufficiently<br />
reflected <strong>in</strong> the establishment of <strong>on</strong>e nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>poverty</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. These cost differences have been<br />
accounted for at household level with the help of the ‘Passche Price Index’. But for an accurate<br />
calculati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>regi<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> differences <strong>in</strong> the cost of liv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>regi<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g>ly adjusted<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> baskets is necessary. As this <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> is miss<strong>in</strong>g, a statistically correct break-down of<br />
the <strong>poverty</strong> and food <strong>poverty</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e to State and Regi<strong>on</strong> level is not possible. Nevertheless, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the PPI <strong>in</strong> the <strong>poverty</strong> gap calculati<strong>on</strong>s can provide at least an <strong>in</strong>dicator of directi<strong>on</strong>, assum<strong>in</strong>g that all<br />
States and Regi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sume the same basket of goods.