24.10.2014 Views

My PhD thesis - Condensed Matter Theory - Imperial College London

My PhD thesis - Condensed Matter Theory - Imperial College London

My PhD thesis - Condensed Matter Theory - Imperial College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 9.<br />

ENERGY<br />

A NEW CALCULATION OF THE JELLIUM SURFACE<br />

determinants; the form of the Jastrow factor was determined after consideration of<br />

the results of chapter 8. The short-ranged two-body term<br />

u cusp (x i , x j ) =<br />

α<br />

2(1 + δ σi σ j<br />

) e−r ij/α−r 2 ij /L2 c<br />

(9.7)<br />

has the advantage that the corresponding one-body function required to restore the<br />

original density is derived analytically: the one- and two-body terms may therefore<br />

be optimised by varying the single parameter α. 2<br />

This speeds up the otherwise<br />

painfully slow manual optimisation process; the failure of automatic optimisation<br />

based on variance minimisation is documented in chapter 5.<br />

The evaluation of<br />

the Jastrow factor within a simulation is also inexpensive compared with the full<br />

plasmonic form.<br />

9.3.1 Results<br />

The first stage of the QMC simulations is the optimisation of the trial wave function.<br />

Short VMC calculations were carried out for different values of α; an example of the<br />

dependence of the VMC energy on α is displayed in figure 9.5. The optimal value<br />

of α, obtained by a quadratic fit to these curves, was found to increase slightly with<br />

the cell size L.<br />

Having obtained optimised wave functions, the next step is to carry out longer<br />

VMC runs, the results of which are plotted in figure 9.6. Systems of size ranging<br />

from 300 up to 3000 electrons were simulated; the number of time steps required<br />

ranged from tens of thousands for the larger systems to around a million for the<br />

smaller ones. The MPC interaction was used for these calculations: testing at one<br />

slab width revealed that the quasi-2D Ewald and MPC interactions returned values<br />

which were in agreement with each other, confirming the results of chapter 6.<br />

The two quasi-2D interactions are compared with the 3D Ewald sum in figure<br />

9.7. The 3D Ewald sum gave slightly lower energies than the other interactions;<br />

2 Note that L c is fixed by the requirement that u cusp (x i , x j ) be effectively zero when |x i −x j | ∼ L,<br />

and is not an optimiseable parameter.<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!