My PhD thesis - Condensed Matter Theory - Imperial College London
My PhD thesis - Condensed Matter Theory - Imperial College London
My PhD thesis - Condensed Matter Theory - Imperial College London
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 9.<br />
ENERGY<br />
A NEW CALCULATION OF THE JELLIUM SURFACE<br />
determinants; the form of the Jastrow factor was determined after consideration of<br />
the results of chapter 8. The short-ranged two-body term<br />
u cusp (x i , x j ) =<br />
α<br />
2(1 + δ σi σ j<br />
) e−r ij/α−r 2 ij /L2 c<br />
(9.7)<br />
has the advantage that the corresponding one-body function required to restore the<br />
original density is derived analytically: the one- and two-body terms may therefore<br />
be optimised by varying the single parameter α. 2<br />
This speeds up the otherwise<br />
painfully slow manual optimisation process; the failure of automatic optimisation<br />
based on variance minimisation is documented in chapter 5.<br />
The evaluation of<br />
the Jastrow factor within a simulation is also inexpensive compared with the full<br />
plasmonic form.<br />
9.3.1 Results<br />
The first stage of the QMC simulations is the optimisation of the trial wave function.<br />
Short VMC calculations were carried out for different values of α; an example of the<br />
dependence of the VMC energy on α is displayed in figure 9.5. The optimal value<br />
of α, obtained by a quadratic fit to these curves, was found to increase slightly with<br />
the cell size L.<br />
Having obtained optimised wave functions, the next step is to carry out longer<br />
VMC runs, the results of which are plotted in figure 9.6. Systems of size ranging<br />
from 300 up to 3000 electrons were simulated; the number of time steps required<br />
ranged from tens of thousands for the larger systems to around a million for the<br />
smaller ones. The MPC interaction was used for these calculations: testing at one<br />
slab width revealed that the quasi-2D Ewald and MPC interactions returned values<br />
which were in agreement with each other, confirming the results of chapter 6.<br />
The two quasi-2D interactions are compared with the 3D Ewald sum in figure<br />
9.7. The 3D Ewald sum gave slightly lower energies than the other interactions;<br />
2 Note that L c is fixed by the requirement that u cusp (x i , x j ) be effectively zero when |x i −x j | ∼ L,<br />
and is not an optimiseable parameter.<br />
175