25.10.2014 Views

vol_4_4_chapter_4_part_III

vol_4_4_chapter_4_part_III

vol_4_4_chapter_4_part_III

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CILS HARMONISED SHARIA PENAL CODE ANNOTATED<br />

87. Subject to the provisions of section 203 paragraph (c) of this law, 114 the right of private<br />

defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the<br />

purpose of defence.<br />

88. There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is reasonable time to have<br />

recourse to the protection of the public authorities. 115<br />

89. There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the<br />

apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done or attempted to be done:<br />

(a) by a public servant doing an act justifiable in law and in good faith; or<br />

(b) by any person acting under the direction of a public servant acting lawfully and in<br />

good faith. 116<br />

90. The right of private defence of the body extends, under the restrictions mentioned in<br />

sections 87 and 88 to the <strong>vol</strong>untary causing of death only when the act to be repelled is of<br />

any of the following descriptions, namely:<br />

(a) an attack which causes reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt; or<br />

(b) rape or an assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust; or<br />

(c) abduction or kidnapping.<br />

91. The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in<br />

sections 87 and 88 to the <strong>vol</strong>untary causing of death only when the act to be repelled is of<br />

any of the following descriptions, namely:<br />

(a) robbery (hirabah); or<br />

(b) house-breaking by night; or<br />

(c) mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or<br />

vessel is used as a human dwelling or as a place for the custody of property; or<br />

(d) theft, mischief, or house-trespass in such circumstances as may reasonably cause<br />

apprehension that, if such right of private defence is not exercised, death or grievous<br />

hurt will be the consequence.<br />

92. If, in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably<br />

causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually<br />

exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence<br />

extends to the running of that risk. 117<br />

114 PC, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Kebbi, Sokoto, Zamfara all leave out this initial “subject to” clause.<br />

115 The word “reasonable” is omitted from all codes except Kano and Katsina.<br />

116 PC adds the following explanation not included in any SPC: “A person is not deprived of the right<br />

of private defence against an act done or attempted to be done: (a) by a public servant as such unless<br />

he knows or has reason to believe that the person doing that act is such public servant; or (b) by the<br />

direction of a public servant, unless he knows or has reason to believe that the person doing the act is<br />

acting by such direction or unless such person states the authority under which he acts or, if he has<br />

authority in writing, unless he produces such authority if demanded.”<br />

117 PC and Sokoto insert an illustration following this section: “A is attacked by a mob which attempts<br />

to kill him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob and<br />

he cannot fire without risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob. A commits no<br />

offence if by so firing he harms any of the children.”<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!