vol_4_4_chapter_4_part_III
vol_4_4_chapter_4_part_III
vol_4_4_chapter_4_part_III
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CILS HARMONISED SHARIA PENAL CODE ANNOTATED<br />
87. Subject to the provisions of section 203 paragraph (c) of this law, 114 the right of private<br />
defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the<br />
purpose of defence.<br />
88. There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is reasonable time to have<br />
recourse to the protection of the public authorities. 115<br />
89. There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the<br />
apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done or attempted to be done:<br />
(a) by a public servant doing an act justifiable in law and in good faith; or<br />
(b) by any person acting under the direction of a public servant acting lawfully and in<br />
good faith. 116<br />
90. The right of private defence of the body extends, under the restrictions mentioned in<br />
sections 87 and 88 to the <strong>vol</strong>untary causing of death only when the act to be repelled is of<br />
any of the following descriptions, namely:<br />
(a) an attack which causes reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt; or<br />
(b) rape or an assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust; or<br />
(c) abduction or kidnapping.<br />
91. The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in<br />
sections 87 and 88 to the <strong>vol</strong>untary causing of death only when the act to be repelled is of<br />
any of the following descriptions, namely:<br />
(a) robbery (hirabah); or<br />
(b) house-breaking by night; or<br />
(c) mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or<br />
vessel is used as a human dwelling or as a place for the custody of property; or<br />
(d) theft, mischief, or house-trespass in such circumstances as may reasonably cause<br />
apprehension that, if such right of private defence is not exercised, death or grievous<br />
hurt will be the consequence.<br />
92. If, in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably<br />
causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually<br />
exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence<br />
extends to the running of that risk. 117<br />
114 PC, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Kebbi, Sokoto, Zamfara all leave out this initial “subject to” clause.<br />
115 The word “reasonable” is omitted from all codes except Kano and Katsina.<br />
116 PC adds the following explanation not included in any SPC: “A person is not deprived of the right<br />
of private defence against an act done or attempted to be done: (a) by a public servant as such unless<br />
he knows or has reason to believe that the person doing that act is such public servant; or (b) by the<br />
direction of a public servant, unless he knows or has reason to believe that the person doing the act is<br />
acting by such direction or unless such person states the authority under which he acts or, if he has<br />
authority in writing, unless he produces such authority if demanded.”<br />
117 PC and Sokoto insert an illustration following this section: “A is attacked by a mob which attempts<br />
to kill him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob and<br />
he cannot fire without risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob. A commits no<br />
offence if by so firing he harms any of the children.”<br />
59