Undue Influence: Definitions and Applications - California Courts ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Quinn, M. J. (2001) Friendly persuasion, good salesmanship, or undue influence. Elder’s Advisor: The Journal of Elder Law and Post-Retirement Planning, 2(4), 49-56. Quinn, M. J. (2002). Undue influence and elder abuse. Geriatric Nursing, 23(1), 11-17. Quinn, M. J., (2005). Guardianships of adults: Achieving justice, autonomy, and safety. New York: Springer. Quinn, M. J., & Nerenberg, L. (2005). Improving access to the San Francisco Superior Court (Probate and Unified Family Courts) for elders: Final report. San Francisco: San Francisco Superior Court. Richards, B., MacRury, I., & Botterill, J. (2000). The dynamics of advertising. London: Harwood. Romero, M. (1985). A comparison between strategies used on prisoners of war and battered wives. Sex Roles 13 (9,10), 537-547. Rice v. Clark (2002) 28 Cal. 4 th 89 Ross v Conway (1892) 92 Cal.632, 635. Ross, E. & Reed, T. (1999). Challenging post-death distribution plans involving lifetime contracts, deeds and trust instruments. Will Contests (2 nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Group. Rothenberg, B. (2003). We don’t have time for social change: Cultural compromise and the battered woman syndrome. Gender and Society, 17(5), 771-787. Rothenberg, R. (1997, June). How powerful is advertising? The Atlantic Monthly, 279 (6), 113- 120. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/97jun/advert.htm Rusch, J.J. (1998). Prepared statement before the U.S. Department of Justice, Sentencing Commission on February 10, 1998. Retrieved August 19, 2009, from http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/fraud/docs/reports/1998/psussc98.pdf 121
Rusch, J. J. (1999). The social engineering of Internet fraud. Report of the U.S. Department of Justice, INET’99 Conference. Retrieved February 6, 2007, from: Rutter, P. (1991). Sex in the forbidden zone. New York: Fawcett Book Group. Schein, E.H. (1961). Coercive persuasion; A socio-psychological analysis of the "brainwashing" of American civilian prisoners by the Chinese Communists. New York: Norton & Company. Seligman, M.E. (1991). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death (2 nd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman Shulman, K. I., Cohen, C. A., Kirsh, F. C., Hull, I. M., & Champine, P. R. (2007). Assessment of testamentary capacity and vulnerability to undue influence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(5), 722-727. Singer, M. T. (1992). Undue influence and written documents: Psychological aspects. Journal of Questioned Document Examination,1(1), 2-13. Singer, M. T. (1995). Cults in our midst. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Slapper, G. (2007, April 12). The Law explored: Undue influence. Times Online. Retrieved from http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/columnists/article1644495.ece Spar, J. E., Hankin, M., & Stodden, A. B. (1995). Assessing mental capacity and susceptibility to undue influence Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 391-403. Stiegel, L. & Klem, E. (2007). Explanation of the “Undue influence: Context, provisions, and citations in adult protective services laws, by state.” Washington DC: American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging. Retrieved from http://www.abanet.org/aging/about/pdfs/Undue_Influence_Explanation.pdf Titus, R., Heinzelmann, R. F., & Boyle, J. (1995). Victimization of persons by fraud. Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), 54-72. 122
Page 1 and 2:
UNDUE INFLUENCE: DEFINITIONS AND AP
Page 3 and 4:
Claims of undue influence can be di
Page 5 and 6:
probate courts. They encounter it a
Page 7 and 8:
4. Focus groups with San Francisco
Page 9 and 10:
More recent law is contained in Cal
Page 11 and 12:
searching bibliographic databases a
Page 13 and 14:
submissiveness to point that victim
Page 15 and 16:
Elements of Undue Influence Describ
Page 17 and 18:
Category I Category II Category III
Page 19 and 20:
Category I Category II Category III
Page 21 and 22:
Focus Groups To gain greater insigh
Page 23 and 24:
for love, emotional attachment, or
Page 25 and 26:
who would deliver the money.’’
Page 27 and 28:
esidence (as opposed to, for exampl
Page 29 and 30:
percent), followed by a change in a
Page 31 and 32:
escinding the sale of the house. Ri
Page 33 and 34:
Capacity Declaration Form The menta
Page 35 and 36:
Case Examples Case Five A 75-year-o
Page 37 and 38:
to undue influence and to more reli
Page 39 and 40:
Project staff have been invited to
Page 41 and 42:
APPENDIX A REPORTS OF CASES DECIDED
Page 43 and 44:
The facts upon which the allegation
Page 45 and 46:
APPENDIX B A STATUTORY DEFINITION O
Page 47 and 48:
whether undue influence has taken p
Page 49 and 50:
etween the testator and the influen
Page 51 and 52:
guardian/ward, physician or nurse/p
Page 53 and 54:
undue influence reduced from the ca
Page 55 and 56:
said at times that she was afraid o
Page 57 and 58:
According to Dr. Spar, the common r
Page 59 and 60:
disposition to exert undue influenc
Page 61 and 62:
her overall mental and physical wea
Page 63 and 64:
Familial relationships are frequent
Page 65 and 66:
This presumption of undue influence
Page 67 and 68:
element (4) requires a disposition
Page 69 and 70:
intentions of testator). However, w
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX C Literature Review on Und
Page 73 and 74: 7. How professionals exploit relati
Page 75 and 76: that can be brought to bear in doin
Page 77 and 78: professionals who became controvers
Page 79 and 80: • Hostage takers threaten to kill
Page 81 and 82: Walker identified four general char
Page 83 and 84: of anxiety, avoidance behavior and
Page 85 and 86: and Vicary later retracted some of
Page 87 and 88: protecting themselves against manip
Page 89 and 90: not exhibit Stockholm syndrome, law
Page 91 and 92: financial gain. Others have focused
Page 93 and 94: esult or outcome of the undue influ
Page 95 and 96: Association, 2008). Naimark (2001)
Page 97 and 98: 2. Power Differentials Undue influe
Page 99 and 100: goes back even further. Abraham Nie
Page 101 and 102: the signing of contracts, the contr
Page 103 and 104: to the accused to show that there w
Page 105 and 106: The authors note that courts tend t
Page 107 and 108: ing a claim that the church had use
Page 109 and 110: 8. An elder’s will, living will,
Page 111 and 112: covered under the prohibited transf
Page 113 and 114: ecovery of damages, attorneys’ fe
Page 115 and 116: As noted earlier in this literature
Page 117 and 118: witnesses with respect to the impor
Page 119 and 120: Donohue, W. A. (1985). The politics
Page 121: Naimark, D. (2001). Financial explo
Page 125 and 126: APPENDIX D Capacity Declaration For
Page 127 and 128: CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTAT
Page 129 and 130: APPENDIX E Court File Review - Deta
Page 131 and 132: Table 8. Age of proposed conservate
Page 133 and 134: Table 12. Proposed conservatee’s
Page 135 and 136: Table 16. Other traits of alleged a
Page 137 and 138: Table 21. How long has the alleged
Page 139 and 140: Table 24. Other elements/characteri
Page 141 and 142: Borchard grant file review 1. Case
Page 143 and 144: Borchard grant file review 12. Tact
Page 145 and 146: Borchard grant file review 20. Does
show all

Undue Influence: Definitions and Applications - California Courts ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?