27.10.2014 Views

Undue Influence: Definitions and Applications - California Courts ...

Undue Influence: Definitions and Applications - California Courts ...

Undue Influence: Definitions and Applications - California Courts ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

continuity of purpose running throughout former wills indicating a settled intent in the<br />

disposition of his estate; (6) whether the disposition of the estate is such that a reasonable person<br />

would regard it as unnatural, unjust or unfair; <strong>and</strong> (7) whether the testator was susceptible to<br />

undue influence. 36<br />

In Nevada, a presumption of undue influence is created where there is a confidential<br />

relationship between the alleged influencer <strong>and</strong> the testator, the alleged influencer actively<br />

participated in the preparation of the testamentary document, <strong>and</strong> the result is unnatural or<br />

unduly favors the alleged influencer. 37<br />

The presumption then shifts the burden of proof to<br />

alleged influencer to show that the absence of undue influence was more probable than its<br />

existence. 38<br />

At trial an examination of the totality of circumstances is essential. Susceptibility to<br />

influence will be an important factor, as well as physical <strong>and</strong> mental condition, social condition<br />

(including whether the testator was isolated or had access to unbiased advice, as well as legal<br />

counsel), significant changes in spending or lifestyle, <strong>and</strong> who took control of the actual disputed<br />

document after it was executed. 39<br />

In North Carolina, the court found no undue influence where the testator was old <strong>and</strong><br />

suffered from loss of memory <strong>and</strong> the proponent of the will helped the testator with her affairs,<br />

drove her to the attorney to make the will, <strong>and</strong> was present at the meeting. The proponent was a<br />

beneficiary of the will but not the testator’s own son or two gr<strong>and</strong>children. The testator had also<br />

36 Ramsey v. Taylor (2000) 166 Or.App. 241.<br />

37 In re Estate of Peterson (1961) 77 Nev. 87, 95.<br />

38 Id.<br />

39 Dustman, Karen Dale, A Primer on <strong>Undue</strong> <strong>Influence</strong>: From Presumption to Proof, Nevada Lawyer, April 2007.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!