29.10.2014 Views

(PDF). - NCAA Wrestling Officiating

(PDF). - NCAA Wrestling Officiating

(PDF). - NCAA Wrestling Officiating

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WI-14<br />

RULE 5 / INFRACTIONS<br />

and table personnel as soon as possible. It would not be necessary to inform the<br />

wrestlers in this case.<br />

According to Rule 5.6.1, the referee who calls a flagrant misconduct shall<br />

remind the table scorer that he or she is required to inform the head coach that<br />

a team member identified by name has been charged with a flagrant misconduct<br />

violation. This is especially important if the coach is not at mat side during the<br />

match. If the head coach is mat side during the flagrant misconduct violation call,<br />

once the referee informs the table scorer of the call, he will then inform the coach.<br />

A wrestler disqualified for committing an act of flagrant misconduct shall be<br />

suspended from competing until after the team’s subsequent event. If flagrant<br />

misconduct occurs during the last event of the season, the suspension carries<br />

over to the first event of the next season. As soon after the match as possible, the<br />

referee shall alert the national coordinator of wrestling officials that a flagrant<br />

misconduct violation occurred. Describe the reason(s) for the call, the wrestler’s<br />

name, weight class, school and event in which it occurred; include the opponent’s<br />

name and school. This notification should take place not later than 48 hours after<br />

the meet via email (preferable) or telephone. Contact information for the national<br />

coordinator of wrestling officials may be found in the front of this rules book.<br />

Holds<br />

Rule 5.8 Illegal<br />

SITUATION 1: Wrestler A uses a Granby roll for a reversal and meets near-fall<br />

criteria for a three-point near fall when Wrester B applies an illegal head scissors.<br />

The situation is allowed to continue since the referee feels the situation is not<br />

unsafe and the buzzer sounds to end the period. QUESTION: Would the referee<br />

award two points for the reversal, three points for the near fall and one point for<br />

the illegal hold? RULING: Yes. The near fall would not be a four-point near fall<br />

since the illegal action did not cause a match stoppage.<br />

SITUATION 2: Wrestler A uses a Granby roll for a reversal and meets near-fall<br />

criteria for a three-point near fall when Wrestler B applies an illegal head scissors.<br />

The situation is not allowed to continue since in the referee’s opinion the situation<br />

is unsafe. QUESTION: Would the referee award two points for the reversal, four<br />

points for the near fall and one point for an illegal hold? RULING: Yes. A fourpoint<br />

near fall would be awarded since the illegal action caused a match stoppage.<br />

Technical Violations<br />

Rule 5.9 Stalling<br />

RULING: The basic intent of Rule 5.9.2 is to ensure that both wrestlers are making<br />

an honest attempt to wrestle near the center of the mat. At the same time, the rule<br />

is not intended to punish a wrestler for moving to set up the opponent and to get<br />

out of a tie-up; however, the repeated movement away from the opponent without<br />

attempting a takedown is stalling. Therefore, if a wrestler repeatedly backs out<br />

of the center with no obvious reason other than to avoid contact, that wrestler is<br />

stalling. Backing out of the center after making contact to avoid an under-hook<br />

or body lock is not stalling as long as the defensive counter is followed with an<br />

offensive attack. Moving away from the center of the mat after making contact is<br />

not stalling as long as movement is followed by an offensive attack.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!