30.10.2014 Views

41845358-Antisemitism

41845358-Antisemitism

41845358-Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 ANTISEMITISM<br />

In the fifth century, St. Augustine argued, on the basis of these governing<br />

New Testament texts, that it was the Jews’ ignorance and blindness that led<br />

them to reject Christ; they did not knowingly kill God. Augustine resolved the<br />

issue of why the Jews continued to exist. In the Augustinian tradition medieval<br />

theologians saw the Jews as bearing witness to the truth of Christianity by<br />

their holy scriptures—appropriated as the Old Testament and conferring a<br />

venerable antiquity on Christianity—and by their exile and degradation for<br />

spurning Jesus. Thus the Jews continued to serve a providential purpose in<br />

history and were therefore to be preserved and tolerated in Christendom; or,<br />

as this idea was expressed by a fifteenth-century writer, “To be a Jew is an offense,<br />

though one that is nonpunishable by the Christian.” 62 And even though<br />

the Jews blindly and perversely adhered to it, Judaism was still recognized as<br />

biblical in origin and character, as was Jewish law, obsolete and nonsalvific<br />

though it was. At the end of time, Jews and Christians alike would be gathered<br />

together into the one fold, and, in the words of Paul, there would be neither<br />

Greek nor Jew, male nor female, slave nor free, and so forth.<br />

In the centuries after Augustine, a corollary developed that the Jewish<br />

leaders recognized Jesus as the messiah promised to them in scripture but that<br />

they did not recognize his divinity. In this view, it was the ignorant masses who<br />

shouted for his crucifixion, because they rejected his messiahship and took his<br />

claim to divinity to be that of an imposter and blasphemer. In the eleventh and<br />

twelfth centuries, that line of theological reasoning weakened the Augustinian<br />

foundations that supported toleration of Judaism, but no clear inference of an<br />

extreme kind was drawn. By the thirteenth century, however, Franciscan and<br />

Dominican theologians provided a biblical basis for intolerance and forced<br />

conversions. They invoked other New Testament passages to conclude that<br />

the Jews knew the truth of Jesus’ divinity but stubbornly refused to accept and<br />

act on it, and it was this deliberate and willful perfidiousness that inspired the<br />

knowing rejection of the divine messiah. The New Testament texts they singled<br />

out included the parable of the vineyard in the synoptic gospels; John<br />

9:39–41, where Jesus tells Pharisees that they see and are not blind and are<br />

therefore “guilty”; and John 15:22–24, where Jesus says he has come and spoken,<br />

and Jews therefore have no excuse and are “guilty of sin.” The Dominican<br />

St. Thomas Aquinas attributed more willfulness than ignorance to the Jews in<br />

committing deicide; they acted, he said, out of envy and hatred. More extreme<br />

were Duns Scotus and Nicholas of Lyra in stating that Jesus’ divinity was manifest,<br />

that the Jews had the proof texts in their own scriptures, but that they<br />

acted willfully out of malice. Raymond Martini’s Dagger of Faith (1278) concluded<br />

that the Jews were wicked and perverse in persisting knowingly in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!