30.10.2014 Views

Click here to view as PDF - MICROmanufacturing

Click here to view as PDF - MICROmanufacturing

Click here to view as PDF - MICROmanufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pharmaceutical production and food processing.<br />

Fanuc’s Cicco said the first step in a typical micromanufacturing<br />

application of a parallel robot like the company’s<br />

M-1iA might involve using machine vision <strong>to</strong> find and identify<br />

tiny electrical components, such <strong>as</strong> resis<strong>to</strong>rs, capaci<strong>to</strong>rs and<br />

chips in s<strong>to</strong>rage bins. Then the robot would move the parts <strong>to</strong><br />

appropriate locations on a circuit board, orient them correctly<br />

and, finally, insert their submillimeter-diameter connecting<br />

wires in<strong>to</strong> the board. Cicco said the parallel robot’s approximately<br />

10"-dia. work envelope, 500-g payload capacity, ±20<br />

μm repeatability and 0.3 seconds for the 1"-12"-1" standard<br />

pick-and-place cycle make it suitable for high-speed <strong>as</strong>sembly<br />

of very small parts.<br />

Articulated robots: This style of robot resembles a human<br />

arm and is frequently used in painting, welding and material<br />

handling. The robot arm h<strong>as</strong> at le<strong>as</strong>t three rotary links and<br />

often rotates on a b<strong>as</strong>e. They are the most flexible robots, but<br />

are generally somewhat slower than application-specific robots.<br />

Cicco said an articulated robot can provide the same repeatability<br />

<strong>as</strong> a parallel robot, carry a larger payload and offers<br />

a larger work envelope. The difference is slightly lower speed;<br />

Fanuc’s LR Mate 200iC robot can cover a 24"-dia. radius around<br />

its b<strong>as</strong>e and handle a 5-kg load, while it performs the 1"-12"-1"<br />

test cycle in 0.7 seconds.<br />

Epson Robots<br />

SCARA robots, like the G-1 from Epson (shown at left), have two<br />

parallel rotary joints that determine X and Y positioning, <strong>as</strong> well<br />

<strong>as</strong> a sliding shaft at the end of the arm that moves in the Z-axis.<br />

Cartesian robots, like the Epson 4-axis EZ Modules system shown<br />

at right, are comprised of linear slides that determine X, Y and Z<br />

movements and operate inside a rectilinear workspace.<br />

Comparing the two technologies, a company making millions<br />

of circuit boards might <strong>as</strong>semble them with a bank of<br />

parallel robots, while a smaller manufacturer could use a single<br />

articulated robot <strong>to</strong> <strong>as</strong>semble smaller numbers of an entire<br />

electronic device, such <strong>as</strong> a calcula<strong>to</strong>r. Working at a somewhat<br />

slower speed than a parallel robot, an LR Mate could <strong>as</strong>semble<br />

the circuit board, pick it up, place it in the housing, drive some<br />

screws, put down glue and <strong>as</strong>semble the whole calcula<strong>to</strong>r by<br />

itself, according <strong>to</strong> Cicco.<br />

SCARA robots: These robots have two parallel rotary joints—<br />

one at the column and one on the arm—that determine X and<br />

Y positioning, <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> a sliding shaft at the end of the arm<br />

that moves in the Z-axis. If the Z-axis rotates, it provides a 4th<br />

(or theta) axis of movement. SCARA robots are compact, f<strong>as</strong>t<br />

and accurate, with somewhat less flexibility than articulatedarm<br />

robots, but cost less. The robot design provides rigidity in<br />

the Z-axis and some compliance in the X and Y axes, making<br />

them good candidates for certain <strong>as</strong>sembly applications. The<br />

two-link arm creates a cylinder-shaped work envelope and enables<br />

the robot <strong>to</strong> reach in<strong>to</strong> an area, giving it the capability <strong>to</strong><br />

move parts in<strong>to</strong> or out of a machine or container and work in<br />

confined spaces. SCARA robots generally have a smaller footprint<br />

than other robot styles.<br />

Hallberg outlined a typical micromanufacturing application<br />

w<strong>here</strong> an Epson G3 SCARA robot w<strong>as</strong> guided with a vision system<br />

<strong>to</strong> find and pick up 0.100"-dia., 0.130"-long medical device<br />

components that were arrayed at random on an indexing conveyor.<br />

The parts featured a small ID projection, which had <strong>to</strong> be<br />

oriented for <strong>as</strong>sembly. The robot p<strong>as</strong>sed the part over a second<br />

video camera <strong>to</strong> find the projection and used that information<br />

<strong>to</strong> rotate the part radially <strong>to</strong> fit the device. It w<strong>as</strong> a “very small<br />

part with very little clearance,” Hallberg said.<br />

Cartesian robots: These systems are comprised of linear slides<br />

that determine X, Y and Z movements and create a rectilinear<br />

workspace. They may be called gantry robots when the horizontal<br />

slide is supported on both ends and can handle comparatively<br />

larger loads than SCARA robots. Cartesian robots are<br />

accurate and used in <strong>as</strong>sembly, pick-and-place and dispensing<br />

operations. A typical dispensing situation, Hallberg said, w<strong>as</strong><br />

a DNA-testing process w<strong>here</strong> the robot put micro droplets<br />

of fluid in<strong>to</strong> 0.25"-dia. test tubes. The test tubes were presented<br />

<strong>to</strong> the robot on pallets in groups of 600. Because the<br />

application didn’t require movement of parts from one area<br />

<strong>to</strong> another, the Cartesian robot’s rectilinear work area, speed<br />

and accuracy made it the best choice.<br />

Robotic integra<strong>to</strong>r RobotWorx, Men<strong>to</strong>r, Ohio, says that<br />

among the important fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> consider when selecting a robot<br />

are the unit’s number of axes, working envelope, carrying capacity,<br />

speed and repeatability.<br />

Epson’s Hallberg said that the single-digit repeatability of<br />

micro<strong>as</strong>sembly robots, coupled with the precision of machine<br />

vision systems, make mechanical issues—such <strong>as</strong> the dexterity<br />

of the grippers used <strong>to</strong> pick parts—the only fac<strong>to</strong>rs limiting<br />

how small a part a robot can handle. Consequently, the combination<br />

of small size, proprietary shapes and varying levels of<br />

complexity can make au<strong>to</strong>mating micromanufacturing and <strong>as</strong>sembly<br />

with robots a creative effort.<br />

Hallberg said, “When you get in<strong>to</strong> micro, t<strong>here</strong> isn’t a lot of<br />

off-the-shelf material available. When things get really, really<br />

small, it’s really application-dependent.” He said it is probably<br />

best <strong>to</strong> work with a supplier that focuses on the <strong>as</strong>sembly and<br />

handling of microparts. µ<br />

About the author: Bill Kennedy is a<br />

contributing edi<strong>to</strong>r for <strong>MICROmanufacturing</strong><br />

and Cutting Tool Engineering magazines.<br />

Telephone: (724) 537-6182.<br />

E-mail: billk@jwr.com.<br />

micromanufacturing.com | 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!