30.10.2014 Views

Click here to view as PDF - MICROmanufacturing

Click here to view as PDF - MICROmanufacturing

Click here to view as PDF - MICROmanufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

process. “For an SEM <strong>to</strong> work it h<strong>as</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

be in a vacuum,” said Phenom-World’s<br />

Schipperen. “Every time you load and<br />

unload samples, you have <strong>to</strong> evacuate, or<br />

pump-down, the vacuum chamber, which<br />

can take 5 or 6 minutes.”<br />

A table<strong>to</strong>p SEM vacuum system typically<br />

provides rapid pump-down, from 20<br />

seconds <strong>to</strong> 1 minute, allowing analysis <strong>to</strong><br />

begin sooner. “Some of this is predicated<br />

on table<strong>to</strong>p units having smaller chambers,”<br />

said Greg Ott, president of ASPEX<br />

Corp., Delmont, Pa., manufacturer of the<br />

PSEM eXpress table<strong>to</strong>p unit.<br />

Phenom’s unit incorporates a sample<br />

cup that attaches <strong>to</strong> the machine instead<br />

of using a stage in the vacuum chamber.<br />

Only the cup h<strong>as</strong> <strong>to</strong> be evacuated—not<br />

the entire chamber. Pump-down time is<br />

less than 30 seconds.<br />

However, using the sample cup instead<br />

of a stage limits the sample size.<br />

“That is the tradeoff with the Phenom,”<br />

said Schipperen. “The maximum sample<br />

size is 1" in diameter. That is still pretty<br />

big for a sample size, though. If you are<br />

going <strong>to</strong> enlarge something up 10,000×,<br />

you don’t need a lot of it.” The manufacturer<br />

does offer larger, cus<strong>to</strong>mized sample<br />

containers.<br />

The maximum sample size for most<br />

table<strong>to</strong>p units is around 70mm in diameter<br />

× 50mm high.<br />

Also making things f<strong>as</strong>ter and e<strong>as</strong>ier,<br />

table<strong>to</strong>p SEMs eliminate the range of accelerating<br />

voltages from which the user<br />

must choose. Conventional SEMs feature<br />

accelerating voltages ranging from<br />

approximately 0.1kV <strong>to</strong> 30kV. The higher<br />

the voltage, the deeper the penetration of<br />

the beam in<strong>to</strong> the sample. However, the<br />

higher voltage can damage some beamsensitive<br />

samples and decre<strong>as</strong>e the image<br />

surface detail. Higher accelerating voltages<br />

are also required for energy-dispersive<br />

X-ray analysis systems, used for<br />

elemental identification.<br />

Most table<strong>to</strong>p models offer users just<br />

a few accelerating voltages, such <strong>as</strong> 5kV,<br />

10kV, 15kV and 20 kV. “The lower voltages<br />

give you better surface imaging,”<br />

said Robert J. Gordon, vice president of<br />

the Nanotechnology and Life Science<br />

Division of Hitachi High Technologies<br />

The table<strong>to</strong>p SEM bridges the gap between optical<br />

microscopy and full-blown electron microscopy.<br />

America Inc., the Ple<strong>as</strong>an<strong>to</strong>n, Calif., manufacturer<br />

of the TM-1000 and TM-3000<br />

table<strong>to</strong>p SEMs. “At lower voltages, the<br />

beam is not <strong>as</strong> energetic and you can use<br />

beam-sensitive materials.”<br />

Another feature that makes table<strong>to</strong>p<br />

SEMs e<strong>as</strong>y <strong>to</strong> use is they are not<br />

<strong>as</strong> affected by noise and vibration <strong>as</strong><br />

traditional SEMs. Imaging at high magnification<br />

in a conventional SEM requires<br />

an environment free from vibration, ambient<br />

noise and electromagnetic interference.<br />

“Because table<strong>to</strong>p SEMs have lower<br />

magnifications, vibration is not always a<br />

major fac<strong>to</strong>r,” said Wolfe. Most of the table<strong>to</strong>p<br />

units feature vibration-dampening<br />

systems <strong>as</strong> well.<br />

One dramatic difference between conventional<br />

and table<strong>to</strong>p SEMs is cost. Traditional<br />

SEMs start around $120,000 and<br />

go up <strong>to</strong> $700,000. Table<strong>to</strong>p models start<br />

Nikon Instruments<br />

Nikon’s NeoScope<br />

JCM-5000 can<br />

inspect electronic<br />

components, such <strong>as</strong><br />

these printed circuit<br />

board connections.<br />

around $65,000. Le<strong>as</strong>ing is an option, but<br />

most cus<strong>to</strong>mers purch<strong>as</strong>e them outright.<br />

Another difference is maintenance. “I<br />

used <strong>to</strong> shudder when I heard t<strong>here</strong> w<strong>as</strong><br />

a problem with our [conventional] SEM,”<br />

said Courtney Martin, manufacturing<br />

engineer at Adaptive Materials Inc., an<br />

Ann Arbor, Mich.-b<strong>as</strong>ed fuel cell manufacturer<br />

that uses the Hitachi TM-1000.<br />

“Conventional SEMs require constant<br />

care and preventative maintenance for<br />

their multiple parts, and ample training<br />

<strong>to</strong> get great images.”<br />

Maintenance issues are typically minimal<br />

with table<strong>to</strong>p SEMs. One consumable<br />

is the filament, the source for<br />

electron generation. Most table<strong>to</strong>p SEMs<br />

feature a tungsten filament, which is simple<br />

for the user <strong>to</strong> replace. However, they<br />

typically have just a 200-hour life.<br />

The Phenom unit’s lanthanum-hexaboride<br />

source provides 1,500 hours of operation.<br />

“It l<strong>as</strong>ts longer and gives a brighter<br />

image than the tungsten, but is quite a<br />

bit more expensive,” said Schipperen. The<br />

micromanufacturing.com | 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!