31.10.2014 Views

Chevron 2006 Annual Report

Chevron 2006 Annual Report

Chevron 2006 Annual Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements<br />

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts<br />

NOTE 15.<br />

LITIGATION<br />

MTBE <strong>Chevron</strong> and many other companies in the petroleum<br />

industry have used methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) as<br />

a gasoline additive. <strong>Chevron</strong> is a party to approximately 75<br />

lawsuits and claims, the majority of which involve numerous<br />

other petroleum marketers and refiners, related to the use of<br />

MTBE in certain oxygenated gasolines and the alleged seepage<br />

of MTBE into groundwater. Resolution of these actions may<br />

ultimately require the company to correct or ameliorate the<br />

alleged effects on the environment of prior release of MTBE<br />

by the company or other parties. Additional lawsuits and<br />

claims related to the use of MTBE, including personal-injury<br />

claims, may be fi led in the future.<br />

The company’s ultimate exposure related to these lawsuits<br />

and claims is not currently determinable, but could be material to<br />

net income in any one period. The company currently does not use<br />

MTBE in the manufacture of gasoline in the United States.<br />

RFG Patent Fourteen purported class actions were brought<br />

by consumers of reformulated gasoline (RFG) alleging that<br />

Unocal misled the California Air Resources Board into<br />

adopting standards for composition of RFG that overlapped<br />

with Unocal’s undisclosed and pending patents. Eleven<br />

lawsuits are now consolidated in U.S. District Court for<br />

the Central District of California and three are consolidated<br />

in California State Court. Unocal is alleged to have<br />

monopolized, conspired and engaged in unfair methods of<br />

competition, resulting in injury to consumers of RFG. Plaintiffs<br />

in both consolidated actions seek unspecified actual and<br />

punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and interest on behalf of an<br />

alleged class of consumers who purchased “summertime” RFG<br />

in California from January 1995 through August 2005. Unocal<br />

believes it has valid defenses and intends to vigorously defend<br />

against these lawsuits. The company’s potential exposure related<br />

to these lawsuits cannot currently be estimated.<br />

NOTE 16.<br />

TAXES<br />

Year ended December 31<br />

<strong>2006</strong> 2005 2004<br />

Taxes on income*<br />

U.S. federal<br />

Current $ 2,828 $ 1,459 $ 2,246<br />

Deferred 200 567 (290)<br />

State and local 581 409 345<br />

Total United States 3,609 2,435 2,301<br />

International<br />

Current 11,030 7,837 5,150<br />

Deferred 199 826 66<br />

Total International 11,229 8,663 5,216<br />

Total taxes on income $ 14,838 $ 11,098 $ 7,517<br />

In <strong>2006</strong>, the before-tax income for U.S. operations,<br />

including related corporate and other charges, was $9,131,<br />

compared with a before-tax income of $6,733 and $7,776 in<br />

2005 and 2004, respectively. For international operations,<br />

before-tax income was $22,845, $18,464 and $12,775 in<br />

<strong>2006</strong>, 2005 and 2004, respectively. U.S. federal income tax<br />

expense was reduced by $116, $289 and $176 in <strong>2006</strong>, 2005<br />

and 2004, respectively, for business tax credits.<br />

The reconciliation between the U.S. statutory federal<br />

income tax rate and the company’s effective income tax rate is<br />

explained in the table below:<br />

Year ended December 31<br />

<strong>2006</strong> 2005 2004<br />

U.S. statutory federal income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%<br />

Effect of income taxes from international<br />

operations at rates different<br />

from the U.S. statutory rate 10.3 9.2 5.3<br />

State and local taxes on income, net<br />

of U.S. federal income tax benefit 1.0 1.0 0.9<br />

Prior-year tax adjustments 0.9 0.1 (1.0)<br />

Tax credits (0.4) (1.1) (0.9)<br />

Effects of enacted changes in tax laws 0.3 – (0.6)<br />

Capital loss tax benefit – (0.1) (2.1)<br />

Other (0.7) – –<br />

Effective tax rate 46.4% 44.1% 36.6%<br />

The company records its deferred taxes on a taxjurisdiction<br />

basis and classifies those net amounts as current<br />

or noncurrent based on the balance sheet classification of the<br />

related assets or liabilities.<br />

The reported deferred tax balances are composed of the<br />

following:<br />

At December 31<br />

<strong>2006</strong> 2005<br />

Deferred tax liabilities<br />

Properties, plant and equipment $ 16,054 $ 14,220<br />

Investments and other 2,137 1,469<br />

Total deferred tax liabilities 18,191 15,689<br />

Deferred tax assets<br />

Abandonment/environmental reserves (2,925) (2,083)<br />

Employee benefits (2,707) (1,250)<br />

Tax loss carryforwards (1,509) (1,113)<br />

Capital losses (246) (246)<br />

Deferred credits (1,670) (1,618)<br />

Foreign tax credits (1,916) (1,145)<br />

Inventory (378) (182)<br />

Other accrued liabilities (375) (240)<br />

Miscellaneous (1,144) (1,237)<br />

Total deferred tax assets (12,870) (9,114)<br />

Deferred tax assets valuation allowance 4,391 3,249<br />

Total deferred taxes, net $ 9,712 $ 9,824<br />

In <strong>2006</strong>, deferred tax liabilities increased by approximately<br />

$2,500 from the amount reported in 2005. The<br />

* Excludes income tax expense of $100 related to discontinued operations for 2004.<br />

68 CHEVRON CORPORATION <strong>2006</strong> ANNUAL REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!