03.11.2014 Views

18th annual conference on manual control.pdf - Acgsc.org

18th annual conference on manual control.pdf - Acgsc.org

18th annual conference on manual control.pdf - Acgsc.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is repeatedfor several values of c<strong>on</strong>trol attenti<strong>on</strong>,fc, and the summati<strong>on</strong>is<br />

taken over the nine elementsof Eq. (i0). The optimal fci that ensue provide<br />

the relativeimportanceof each of the states, i.e., the informati<strong>on</strong>requirements<br />

for the c<strong>on</strong>trol task.<br />

The OCM analysis yields the relative attenti<strong>on</strong>al allocati<strong>on</strong> (fci/fc), summarized<br />

in Table 1 and Figure I. The attenti<strong>on</strong>al allocati<strong>on</strong>s are examined at four<br />

levels of total c<strong>on</strong>trol attenti<strong>on</strong>, fc = 0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3. The <strong>on</strong>ly variables<br />

..thatcommand significant pilot attenti<strong>on</strong> are the terrain "vertical accelerati<strong>on</strong>"<br />

_(t), the FPE rate, e(t), and the FPE e(t). All other system states demand<br />

negligible attenti<strong>on</strong> in the pilot model.<br />

TABLE i. RELATIVE ATTENTIONAL ALLOCATION- f<br />

INFORMATION LEVEL c! $<br />

.... ....... -_c 0.6<br />

fc f/fc re/refe/fc 04<br />

0.9 0.46 0.34 0.i 0.2<br />

0.7 0.46 0.36 0.i . : • , •<br />

I<br />

0.5 0.42 0.36 0.i 0:2 0'.4 0._6 0.'8 1.0'_ f¢<br />

0.3 0.37 0.33 0.i<br />

........ Figure i. Relative Attenti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Allocati<strong>on</strong>-lnformati<strong>on</strong> Level.<br />

Notice that there is a c<strong>on</strong>sistency in these results, i.e.,<br />

fe<br />

fe<br />

f = c<strong>on</strong>st., --_--- =_c<strong>on</strong>st., f _ c<strong>on</strong>st.<br />

c c C<br />

Thus, the relative importance of the key state variables does not change over<br />

different levels of c<strong>on</strong>trol attenti<strong>on</strong> fc"<br />

,.<br />

The results, which indicate that _(t), e(t), and e(t) is the critical informati<strong>on</strong><br />

base, must now be interpreted. A major design issue, at this point, is<br />

in determining whether or not a separate display of each critical variable is<br />

required for use by the pilot. It is clear that a FPE indicator should be<br />

included since it is essential that the pilot knows his instantaneous positi<strong>on</strong><br />

with respect to the desired path K(t). Such a display is easily c<strong>on</strong>structed<br />

using, e.g., a radar altimeter. Also, the pilot can easily extract the FPE<br />

rate from a well designed display of e (t), and therefore, a separate e (t)<br />

indicator is not needed.<br />

The major porti<strong>on</strong> of the pilot's attenti<strong>on</strong> is allocated to E(t). In practice,<br />

this variable is difficult to derive and display explicity. Also, it is not<br />

clear how such a display might.be used by the pilot. One must, therefore,<br />

synthesize a display in which _ (t) will be incorporated in a practical manner.<br />

274

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!