03.11.2014 Views

18th annual conference on manual control.pdf - Acgsc.org

18th annual conference on manual control.pdf - Acgsc.org

18th annual conference on manual control.pdf - Acgsc.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL OF SIMULATED AIRCRAFT<br />

WITH AND WITHOUT COCKPIT TRAFFIC DISPLAYS*<br />

Sheryl L. Chappell John G. Kreifeldt<br />

Computer Sciences Corp. Dept. of Engineering Design<br />

NASA Ames Research Center Tufts University<br />

Moffett Field, CA Medford, MA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This study examines the air traffic c<strong>on</strong>trol of air carrier<br />

and general aviati<strong>on</strong> simulated aircraft with and without a<br />

cockpit display of traffic informati<strong>on</strong> (CDTI). Air traffic<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trollers provided spacing and sequencing for air carrier<br />

type simulators flown by airline pilots and small twin<br />

engine/single engine lower-fidelity simulators flown by general<br />

aviati<strong>on</strong> pilots <strong>on</strong> an approach to landing. Some of<br />

these aircraft had CDTI, a graphic representati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

positi<strong>on</strong> of other aircraft relative to his/her aircraft and<br />

the navigati<strong>on</strong>al aids.<br />

Differences in the air traffic c<strong>on</strong>trol were found due<br />

to aircraft type and the presence of a CDTI. There was no<br />

difference due to CDTI in aircraft separati<strong>on</strong> violati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Two air carrier aircraft were within <strong>on</strong>e nautical mile<br />

lateral separati<strong>on</strong> and 950 feet vertically for a l<strong>on</strong>ger<br />

period of time than two general aviati<strong>on</strong> (GA) aircraft or an<br />

air carrier and GA aircraft. Two GA aircraft were within<br />

<strong>on</strong>e mile l<strong>on</strong>ger than an air carrier and a GA aircraft.<br />

The variance of intercrossing times at the middle<br />

marker between an aircraft and the previous aircraft was<br />

greater for aircraft with CDTI and for air carrier aircraft.<br />

The number and type of c<strong>on</strong>troller/pilot communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

were different for the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of simulator type and<br />

presence of CDTI. Of those communicati<strong>on</strong> types showing<br />

differences in frequency due to the presence of a CDTI, all<br />

except heading changes occured more often to and from an<br />

aircraft with a CDTI. For example, the c<strong>on</strong>troller gave more<br />

traffic advisories and had more questi<strong>on</strong>s for an aircraft<br />

with a CDTI. Those aircraft with CDTI had more communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of all types than those without CDTI. The airline aircraft<br />

in general, had more communicati<strong>on</strong>s but the smaller<br />

aircraft had more communicati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cerning heading changes.<br />

Air traffic c<strong>on</strong>trol of the aircraft in this simulati<strong>on</strong><br />

showed similar characteristics to the current aviati<strong>on</strong> system.<br />

For example, the air carrier aircraft were given speed<br />

and altitude changes while the GA aircraft were given<br />

* Supported by NASA Grant NSG 2156 to Tufts University.<br />

54.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!