Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 28 of 139<br />
to <strong>Rimkus</strong> customer information, <strong>Rimkus</strong> business plans, <strong>Rimkus</strong> operations information,<br />
and <strong>Rimkus</strong> work for their clients.<br />
In 2004, Bell became central region property manager and a vice-president of <strong>Rimkus</strong>.<br />
He was responsible for the area from Louisiana to the Canadian border. On July 14, 2005,<br />
<strong>Rimkus</strong> and Bell entered into a “Common Stock Purchase Agreement.” Under the Common<br />
Stock Purchase Agreement, Bell purchased 2,000 shares of <strong>Rimkus</strong> stock. The Agreement<br />
was between the “Corporation,” defined as <strong>Rimkus</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., and the<br />
“Shareholder,” defined as Bell. The Common Stock Purchase Agreement contained a<br />
noncompetition clause, which provided as follows:<br />
Each Shareholder, recognizing that a covenant not to compete<br />
is required to protect the business interests of the Corporation,<br />
agrees that unless the Corporation consents in writing to the<br />
contrary, such Shareholder shall not engage directly or indirectly<br />
as an employee, agent, shareholder, officer, director, partner,<br />
sole proprietor or in any other fashion in a competing business<br />
in any of the geographic areas in which the Corporation is then<br />
conducting business, during his period of employment by the<br />
Corporation and for five (5) years after the Closing of the<br />
purchase transaction. . . . The covenant is in addition to any<br />
non-competition agreement contained in any employment<br />
agreement between each Shareholder and the Corporation. Each<br />
Shareholder has entered into an Employment Agreement with<br />
the Corporation which contains such a non-competition<br />
agreement. Shareholders and the Corporation agree that, for<br />
purposes of this Agreement, the non-competition provisions<br />
extending the period to a five-year period commencing with the<br />
date of any Terminating event will prevail over the period as<br />
specified in the Employment Agreement between each<br />
Shareholder and the Corporation.<br />
(Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. C at 10–11).<br />
28