Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 68 of 139<br />
filed suit in January and February 2007.<br />
Despite the fact that the founders of U.S. Forensic had sought and obtained legal<br />
advice on many aspects of their departure from <strong>Rimkus</strong> and their formation and operation<br />
of the competing business, they made no effort to preserve relevant documents, even after<br />
the Louisiana and Texas suits had been filed. To the contrary, the evidence shows<br />
affirmative steps to delete potentially relevant documents. Even assuming that there was an<br />
email destruction policy as DeHarde testified, it was selectively implemented. The deleted<br />
documents included emails and attachments relevant to the disputes with <strong>Rimkus</strong>—the<br />
emails and attachments showing what information U.S. Forensic’s founders took from<br />
<strong>Rimkus</strong> to use in the competing business, including to solicit business from <strong>Rimkus</strong> clients,<br />
and how they solicited those clients.<br />
The record shows that the electronically stored information that the defendants deleted<br />
or destroyed after the duty to preserve arose was relevant to the issues involving both Bell<br />
and <strong>Cammarata</strong>, not limited to a breach of fiduciary claim against Bell. The deleted emails<br />
and attachments related not only to setting up U.S. Forensic but also to obtaining information<br />
from <strong>Rimkus</strong>, including copyrighted materials, financial documents, and customer lists; using<br />
at least some of that information to operate U.S. Forensic in competition with <strong>Rimkus</strong>; and<br />
soliciting business for U.S. Forensic. The evidence shows that by deleting emails relating<br />
to forming U.S. Forensic and to using information from <strong>Rimkus</strong> for U.S. Forensic, by failing<br />
to preserve such emails, and by giving away or destroying laptops with such emails, the<br />
defendants destroyed potentially relevant evidence.<br />
68