Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 60 of 139<br />
transmitted any information he knew to be confidential <strong>Rimkus</strong> information. (Docket Entry<br />
No. 410, Ex. Supp. W, Deposition of J. Darren Balentine at 60:10–:18). <strong>Rimkus</strong> took a brief<br />
additional deposition on October 27, 2009. In the October deposition, Balentine stated he<br />
did not recall sending Bell the client-contact information and that he was unable to find a<br />
record of sending Bell an email with the client information in April 2008. (Docket Entry No.<br />
445, Ex. B., Deposition of J. Darren Balentine at 35:7–:10, 39:11–:18, 51:1–:25, 97:6–98:4).<br />
<strong>Rimkus</strong> filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on October 1, 2009, seeking,<br />
among other things, to require Bell and others to return all of <strong>Rimkus</strong>’s confidential<br />
information and seeking to enjoin Bell and anyone at U.S. Forensic from using the<br />
information contained in the email attachments. (Docket Entry No. 416). At a hearing<br />
before this court on October 6, 2009, the parties agreed to certain provisions of the proposed<br />
injunction, and this court granted the preliminary injunction in part. (Docket Entry No. 425).<br />
In addition to the email attachments containing <strong>Rimkus</strong> customer information, <strong>Rimkus</strong><br />
also points to a newly discovered email stating that Bell met with a real estate agent in<br />
August 2006, while he was still working at <strong>Rimkus</strong>, and on August 15, 2006 received a<br />
Letter of Intent to lease the space. (Docket Entry No. 410, Ex. Supp. Q). The Letter of<br />
Intent identified “U.S. Forensics, LLC” as the subtenant and noted that the “LLC [was] to<br />
be established in September, 2006.” (Id.). <strong>Rimkus</strong> argues that the Letter of Intent naming<br />
U.S. Forensic contradicts Bell’s earlier deposition testimony that Bell did not plan to leave<br />
<strong>Rimkus</strong> before he did so and that his only steps before leaving <strong>Rimkus</strong> was speaking to his<br />
brother about going to work for him. (Docket Entry No. 410 at 13–23).<br />
60