04.11.2014 Views

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 35 of 139<br />

obtained client-contact information and denying that they took <strong>Rimkus</strong> confidential<br />

information when they resigned is false. <strong>Rimkus</strong> contends that Bell and <strong>Cammarata</strong> could<br />

not have obtained contact information for the individuals they emailed to solicit business<br />

unless they took the information with them when they left <strong>Rimkus</strong>. <strong>Rimkus</strong> points to an<br />

email Bell sent on December 10, 2006, in which he asked for a copy of the 2006 Louisiana<br />

Casualty Adjuster’s Guide because he did not yet have one. (Docket Entry No. 324, Ex. E).<br />

<strong>Rimkus</strong> also points to an October 1, 2006 email forwarded to Bell from an employee at<br />

<strong>Rimkus</strong>. This email contained contact information for insurance adjusters at Lexington<br />

Insurance, a <strong>Rimkus</strong> client. (Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. Q). 24<br />

And, according to <strong>Rimkus</strong>,<br />

many of the insurance adjusters Bell and <strong>Cammarata</strong> contacted in November and December<br />

2006 are not listed in the Louisiana Casualty Adjuster’s Guide.<br />

In late August 2009, <strong>Rimkus</strong> submitted information showing that Gary Bell<br />

maintained a previously undisclosed personal email address to which he forwarded<br />

information from <strong>Rimkus</strong>. In his March 8, 2009 deposition, Bell testified that the only email<br />

addresses he used during 2006 were glb@rimkus.com and garylbell@bellsouth.net. (Docket<br />

Entry No. 314, Deposition of Gary Bell, Vol. 2 at 247:10–:19). The deposition continued:<br />

Q: Are there any others?<br />

A: I don’t believe so.<br />

Q: You don’t have like a Hotmail address?<br />

24<br />

<strong>Rimkus</strong> alleges that Bell forwarded the October 1 email on October 5, 2006. The copy of the email<br />

submitted to the court does not clearly reflect a forward on October 5, 2006, but portions of the screen shot<br />

submitted are not legible. (Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. Q).<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!