04.11.2014 Views

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 53 of 139<br />

C<br />

On December 13, 2006, Bell emailed Sandra Carter with Lexington Insurance<br />

“to introduce U.S. Forensic, a Louisiana and Mississippi based forensic<br />

engineering firm which specializes in evaluation of civil, structural, electrical<br />

and mechanical failures.” (Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. L-3). Bell continued:<br />

“You may remember me from my previous position as Central U.S. Operations<br />

Manager at <strong>Rimkus</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> and my trip to Boston a couple of<br />

months back. I left with a couple of engineers from <strong>Rimkus</strong> and a couple from<br />

a competitor to form a new, leaner firm that focuses on decisive, cost effective<br />

reports with no more than a two week turnaround.” (Id.). Bell stated that U.S.<br />

Forensic “would be pleased to work with you and Lexington Insurance.” (Id.).<br />

<strong>Rimkus</strong> has submitted evidence that Carter’s new contact information was<br />

contained in an email that Bell received from a coworker at <strong>Rimkus</strong> on<br />

October 1, 2006. <strong>Rimkus</strong> alleges that Bell forwarded this email on October 5,<br />

2006, using his <strong>Rimkus</strong> email account, to an unknown email address. (Id., Ex.<br />

Q). 31<br />

The belatedly produced emails show that in November and December 2006,<br />

<strong>Cammarata</strong> also contacted individuals he had dealt with while working at <strong>Rimkus</strong>. On<br />

November 30, 2006, <strong>Cammarata</strong> emailed Ken Mansfield about his new firm. (Docket Entry<br />

No. 324, Ex. Z). <strong>Cammarata</strong> referred to assignments they had worked on together at <strong>Rimkus</strong><br />

and told Mansfield to let <strong>Rimkus</strong> know his requirements if he wanted <strong>Rimkus</strong> to continue<br />

providing forensic engineering services. (Id.). <strong>Cammarata</strong> gave Mansfield the contact<br />

information for the <strong>Rimkus</strong> New Orleans District Manager but also offered “to provide<br />

professional engineering services to you and your firm as you may require” and asked<br />

Mansfield to contact him. (Id.). On December 11, 2006, <strong>Cammarata</strong> emailed Bill Parsons<br />

of Gray Insurance to follow up on a phone conversation they had about an assignment<br />

<strong>Cammarata</strong> had been working on for Parsons before leaving <strong>Rimkus</strong>. (Id., Ex. AA).<br />

31 The copy of the email submitted to the court does not clearly reflect a forward on October 5, 2006, but<br />

portions of the screen shot submitted are not legible. (Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. Q).<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!