Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 53 of 139<br />
C<br />
On December 13, 2006, Bell emailed Sandra Carter with Lexington Insurance<br />
“to introduce U.S. Forensic, a Louisiana and Mississippi based forensic<br />
engineering firm which specializes in evaluation of civil, structural, electrical<br />
and mechanical failures.” (Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. L-3). Bell continued:<br />
“You may remember me from my previous position as Central U.S. Operations<br />
Manager at <strong>Rimkus</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> and my trip to Boston a couple of<br />
months back. I left with a couple of engineers from <strong>Rimkus</strong> and a couple from<br />
a competitor to form a new, leaner firm that focuses on decisive, cost effective<br />
reports with no more than a two week turnaround.” (Id.). Bell stated that U.S.<br />
Forensic “would be pleased to work with you and Lexington Insurance.” (Id.).<br />
<strong>Rimkus</strong> has submitted evidence that Carter’s new contact information was<br />
contained in an email that Bell received from a coworker at <strong>Rimkus</strong> on<br />
October 1, 2006. <strong>Rimkus</strong> alleges that Bell forwarded this email on October 5,<br />
2006, using his <strong>Rimkus</strong> email account, to an unknown email address. (Id., Ex.<br />
Q). 31<br />
The belatedly produced emails show that in November and December 2006,<br />
<strong>Cammarata</strong> also contacted individuals he had dealt with while working at <strong>Rimkus</strong>. On<br />
November 30, 2006, <strong>Cammarata</strong> emailed Ken Mansfield about his new firm. (Docket Entry<br />
No. 324, Ex. Z). <strong>Cammarata</strong> referred to assignments they had worked on together at <strong>Rimkus</strong><br />
and told Mansfield to let <strong>Rimkus</strong> know his requirements if he wanted <strong>Rimkus</strong> to continue<br />
providing forensic engineering services. (Id.). <strong>Cammarata</strong> gave Mansfield the contact<br />
information for the <strong>Rimkus</strong> New Orleans District Manager but also offered “to provide<br />
professional engineering services to you and your firm as you may require” and asked<br />
Mansfield to contact him. (Id.). On December 11, 2006, <strong>Cammarata</strong> emailed Bill Parsons<br />
of Gray Insurance to follow up on a phone conversation they had about an assignment<br />
<strong>Cammarata</strong> had been working on for Parsons before leaving <strong>Rimkus</strong>. (Id., Ex. AA).<br />
31 The copy of the email submitted to the court does not clearly reflect a forward on October 5, 2006, but<br />
portions of the screen shot submitted are not legible. (Docket Entry No. 321, Ex. Q).<br />
53