Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 49 of 139<br />
failed. Bostick testified that space on the external hard drives became a concern around late<br />
2007. (Docket Entry No. 314-9, Deposition of Allen Bostick at 148:1–:4).<br />
In late 2007, U.S. Forensic began using three external hard drives and subsequently<br />
began using different backup software. The new software did not create a backup image on<br />
the server. Instead, the backup was directly to the external hard drive. On May 28, 2009,<br />
the defendants reported that three backup images had been located. Bostick was able to<br />
restore one of these images but two others were corrupted and U.S. Forensic no longer had<br />
the software to restore them. According to the defendants, the hard drives had to be sent to<br />
the software company for any attempt at restoration.<br />
The defendants reviewed the emails recovered from the restored backup image and<br />
determined that none were relevant The defendants also retained Roddy Orgeron, an IT<br />
consultant, to determine the time, cost, and likelihood of obtaining information from the<br />
corrupted drives. Orgeron could not open the files because the hard drive was damaged and<br />
because he did not have the necessary software. According to Orgeron, there was some<br />
possibility that some backup files could be recovered, but it would cost between $2,000.00<br />
and $10,000.00 and there was a slim likelihood of success because of the damage to the hard<br />
drive.<br />
On May 29, 2009, <strong>Rimkus</strong> continued with DeHarde’s deposition. DeHarde produced<br />
several responsive emails that he had found in his Yahoo! mail account. These emails were<br />
sent to DeHarde from other <strong>Rimkus</strong> employees while DeHarde still worked at <strong>Rimkus</strong>.<br />
DeHarde received these emails at his <strong>Rimkus</strong> email address but forwarded them to his<br />
49