04.11.2014 Views

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

Rimkus Consulting Group Inc. v. Cammarata - Ballard Spahr LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 4:07-cv-00405 Document 450 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/10 Page 38 of 139<br />

court’s ruling on Bell’s Common Stock Purchase Agreement and held that the<br />

noncompetition clause in that Agreement was invalid and unenforceable. On March 25,<br />

2008, the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision that<br />

Louisiana law applied to the parties’ agreements and that the Texas forum-selection and<br />

choice-of-law clauses and the noncompetition and nonsolicitation covenants in the<br />

Employment Agreement were unenforceable. Bell v. <strong>Rimkus</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. of La.,<br />

07-996 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/25/08); 983 So. 2d 927. In holding that Louisiana law applied to<br />

the 1996 Employment Agreement despite the Texas choice-of-law clause, the Louisiana<br />

Court of Appeal stated:<br />

Forum selection clauses will be upheld unless they<br />

contravene strong public policy of the forum in which the suit<br />

is brought. LA. C.C. art. 3450. LA. R.S. 23:921 A(2), a<br />

provision which was added by the legislature in 1999, is an<br />

expression of strong Louisiana public policy concerning forum<br />

selection clauses. . . .<br />

. . . Louisiana law expressly provides that conventional<br />

obligations are governed by the law of the state whose policies<br />

would be most seriously impaired if its law were not applied to<br />

the issue. Further, issues of conventional obligations may be<br />

governed by law chosen by the parties, except to the extent that<br />

law contravenes the public policy of the state whose law would<br />

be applicable under La. C.C. art 3537.<br />

As previously stated herein, Louisiana has a longstanding<br />

public policy to prohibit or severely restrict non-competition<br />

provisions in employment agreements which curtail an<br />

employee’s right to [] earn his livelihood. These agreements are<br />

in derogation of the common right, and they must be strictly<br />

construed against the party seeking their enforcement.<br />

Application of Texas law to this dispute would thwart<br />

Louisiana’s longstanding public policy and interest in this type<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!