05.11.2014 Views

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EpidEmiologic TrEnds in drug AbusE: HigHligHTs And ExEcuTivE summAry<br />

Appendix 2.15. Top 10 Most Frequently Identified Appendix 2.16. Top 10 Most Frequently Identified<br />

<strong>Drug</strong>s of Total Analyzed <strong>Drug</strong> Items, Philadelphia: <strong>Drug</strong>s of Total Analyzed <strong>Drug</strong> Items, Phoenix:<br />

1H 2008 1 1H 2008 1<br />

<strong>Drug</strong> Number Percent<br />

<strong>Drug</strong> Number Percent<br />

Cocaine 6,387 39.8<br />

Cannabis 1,359 40.3<br />

Cannabis 5,619 35.0<br />

Methamphetamine 763 22.6<br />

Heroin 1,710 10.6<br />

Cocaine 691 20.5<br />

Oxycod<strong>on</strong>e 484 3.0<br />

Heroin 216 6.4<br />

Alprazolam 464 2.9<br />

Hydrocod<strong>on</strong>e 40 1.2<br />

Phencyclidine 428 2.7<br />

Oxycod<strong>on</strong>e 37 1.1<br />

Codeine 130 0.8<br />

3,4-Methylenedioxy-<br />

36 1.1<br />

Hydrocod<strong>on</strong>e 104 0.6<br />

methamphetamine<br />

Cl<strong>on</strong>azepam 75 0.5<br />

Morphine 24 0.7<br />

Methad<strong>on</strong>e 50 0.3<br />

Alprazolam 16 0.5<br />

Other 606 3.8<br />

Carisoprodol 16 0.5<br />

Total 16,057 100.0<br />

Other 174 5.2<br />

1<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008–June 2008.<br />

NOTES:<br />

1. Data are for Philadelphia County.<br />

Total<br />

1<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008–June 2008.<br />

NOTES:<br />

3,372 100.0<br />

2. “N<strong>on</strong>c<strong>on</strong>trolled N<strong>on</strong>narcotic <strong>Drug</strong>” represents 119 cases and is<br />

included as “Other.”<br />

3. “No C<strong>on</strong>trolled <strong>Drug</strong> Identified” represents 247 cases and is<br />

included as “Other.”<br />

4. Percentages may not sum to total due to rounding.<br />

SOURCE: NFLIS, DEA, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4, 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>; data are subject to change<br />

1. Data are for Maricopa County.<br />

2. “N<strong>on</strong>c<strong>on</strong>trolled N<strong>on</strong>narcotic <strong>Drug</strong>” represents nine cases and is<br />

included as “Other.”<br />

3. “Negative Results - Tested for Specific <strong>Drug</strong>s” represents 28 cases<br />

and is included as “Other.”<br />

4. Percentages may not sum to total due to rounding.<br />

SOURCE: NFLIS, DEA, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4, 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>; data are subject to change<br />

Appendix 2.17. Top 10 Most Frequently Identified<br />

<strong>Drug</strong>s of Total Analyzed <strong>Drug</strong> Items, San Diego:<br />

1H 2008 1<br />

<strong>Drug</strong> Number Percent<br />

Cannabis 5,179 50.6<br />

Methamphetamine 2,085 20.4<br />

Cocaine 1,411 13.8<br />

Heroin 350 3.4<br />

3,4-Methylenedioxy-<br />

207 2.0<br />

methamphetamine<br />

Hydrocod<strong>on</strong>e 179 1.7<br />

Oxycod<strong>on</strong>e 83 0.8<br />

Alprazolam 81 0.8<br />

Diazepam 49 0.5<br />

Amphetamine 45 0.4<br />

Other 565 5.5<br />

Total 10,234 100.0<br />

1<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008–June 2008.<br />

NOTES:<br />

1. Data are for San Diego County.<br />

2. “Plant Material, Other” represents 110 cases and is included as<br />

“Other.”<br />

3. Percentages may not sum to total due to rounding.<br />

SOURCE: NFLIS, DEA, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4, 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>; data are subject to change<br />

Appendix Table 2.18. Top 10 Most Frequently<br />

Identified <strong>Drug</strong>s of Total Analyzed <strong>Drug</strong> Items,<br />

San Francisco: 1H 2008 1<br />

<strong>Drug</strong> Number Percent<br />

Cocaine 3,602 30.2<br />

Cannabis 3,438 28.8<br />

Methamphetamine 1,876 15.7<br />

Heroin 646 5.4<br />

3,4-Methylenedioxy-<br />

455 3.8<br />

methamphetamine<br />

Oxycod<strong>on</strong>e 273 2.3<br />

Hydrocod<strong>on</strong>e 240 2.0<br />

Morphine 94 0.8<br />

Methad<strong>on</strong>e 93 0.8<br />

Diazepam 70 0.6<br />

Other 1,138 9.5<br />

Total 11,925 100.0<br />

1<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008–June 2008.<br />

NOTES:<br />

1. Data are for the San Francisco/Frem<strong>on</strong>t MSA, including Alameda,<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties.<br />

2. “Negative Results - Tested for Specific <strong>Drug</strong>s” represents 650<br />

cases and is included as “Other.”<br />

3. 57.3 percent of items were seized in San Francisco County, 24.5<br />

percent in C<strong>on</strong>tra Costa, 14.8 percent in San Mateo, 2.5 percent in<br />

Marin and 0.8 percent in Alameda.<br />

4. Percentages may not sum to total due to rounding.<br />

SOURCE: NFLIS, DEA, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4, 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>; data are subject to change<br />

104<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!