05.11.2014 Views

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Secti<strong>on</strong> IV. Across <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> Areas: Treatment Admissi<strong>on</strong>s, Forensic Laboratory Analysis Data, and Average <strong>Drug</strong> Price and Purity Data<br />

frequencies of cocaine drug items am<strong>on</strong>g those<br />

identified in forensic laboratories were in H<strong>on</strong>olulu<br />

and San Diego, at 18.2 percent and 13.8 percent,<br />

respectively (figure 15; appendix table 2).<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> rankings shown in secti<strong>on</strong> II, table<br />

1, in four of the five southern regi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas<br />

(Miami, Atlanta, Baltimore City, and Washingt<strong>on</strong>,<br />

DC), cocaine ranked as the most frequently<br />

identified drug in forensic laboratories in the first<br />

half of 2008. In two of the three <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas in<br />

the northeastern regi<strong>on</strong>, Philadelphia and New<br />

York City, cocaine ranked first am<strong>on</strong>g drug items<br />

identified. It was first in six of nine areas in the<br />

western regi<strong>on</strong> (Texas, Los Angeles, Seattle, Denver,<br />

Albuquerque, and San Francisco). Cocaine<br />

ranked first in <strong>on</strong>e of the five areas in the midwestern<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>, Minneapolis/St. Paul, although it<br />

ranked sec<strong>on</strong>d in drug items identified in 2007 in<br />

the other four areas in the Midwest, as well as in<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong> and Maryland.<br />

Figure 15. Cocaine Items Identified as a Percentage of Total NFLIS <strong>Drug</strong> Items, 22 <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> Areas:<br />

1H 2008<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

Miami 64.7<br />

Atlanta 58.9<br />

New York City 46.7<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong>, DC 41.1<br />

Philadelphia 39.8<br />

Cincinnati 39.6<br />

Denver 38.9<br />

Baltimore City 37.6<br />

Seattle 36.5<br />

Albuquerque 36.2<br />

Maryland 36.1<br />

Los Angeles 34.9<br />

Texas 34.2<br />

San Francisco 30.2<br />

Minneapolis/St. Paul 29.5<br />

Chicago 26.5<br />

Detroit 25.6<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong> 24.1<br />

Phoenix 20.5<br />

St. Louis 19.6<br />

H<strong>on</strong>olulu 18.2<br />

San Diego 13.8<br />

SOURCE: NFLIS, DEA, received <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4, 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>; see appendix table 2<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g> 77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!