05.11.2014 Views

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Secti<strong>on</strong> IV. Across <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> Areas: Treatment Admissi<strong>on</strong>s, Forensic Laboratory Analysis Data, and Average <strong>Drug</strong> Price and Purity Data<br />

Methamphetamine<br />

• The proporti<strong>on</strong>s of primary treatment admissi<strong>on</strong>s including primary alcohol admissi<strong>on</strong>s for<br />

methamphetamine abuse in 17 reporting <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas were especially high in Hawai‘i, San Diego,<br />

and Phoenix, at approximately 33, 32, and 25 percent, respectively. They were also relatively high<br />

in San Francisco and Los Angeles, at approximately 20 and 19 percent, respectively (table 10;<br />

appendix table 1).<br />

• Methamphetamine ranked first in treatment admissi<strong>on</strong>s as a percentage of total admissi<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

San Diego, and ranked sec<strong>on</strong>d in Hawai‘i, Los Angeles, and Phoenix (secti<strong>on</strong> II, table 2).<br />

• Methamphetamine ranked first am<strong>on</strong>g all drugs in proporti<strong>on</strong>s of forensic laboratory items<br />

identified in H<strong>on</strong>olulu in the first half of 2008, and sec<strong>on</strong>d in Atlanta, Phoenix, and San Diego<br />

(secti<strong>on</strong> II, table 1). The largest proporti<strong>on</strong>s of methamphetamine items identified were reported<br />

in H<strong>on</strong>olulu (close to 43 percent), followed by Minneapolis/St. Paul (approximately 27 percent),<br />

Phoenix (approximately 23 percent), and San Diego and Albuquerque (approximately 20<br />

percent each). On the other hand, less than 1–2 percent of drug items identified as c<strong>on</strong>taining<br />

methamphetamine were reported in most <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> metropolitan areas east of the Mississippi,<br />

including Chicago, Philadelphia, New York City, Cincinnati, Miami, Detroit, Baltimore City, Bost<strong>on</strong>,<br />

and Maryland (figure 18; appendix table 2).<br />

Treatment Admissi<strong>on</strong> Data <strong>on</strong><br />

Methamphetamine<br />

Data <strong>on</strong> primary methamphetamine treatment<br />

admissi<strong>on</strong>s in the first half of 2008 reporting<br />

period were available for 17 <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas (table<br />

10). As a percentage of total treatment admissi<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

including primary alcohol admissi<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

Hawai‘i had the highest proporti<strong>on</strong> of methamphetamine<br />

admissi<strong>on</strong>s, at 32.6 percent, followed<br />

by San Diego, at 31.5 percent. In the same<br />

period, primary methamphetamine admissi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

accounted for approximately 19–25 percent of<br />

total primary admissi<strong>on</strong>s in Phoenix, San Francisco,<br />

and Los Angeles (table 10). Nine <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

areas, all east of the Mississippi River, reported<br />

that either no admissi<strong>on</strong>s, very few admissi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(Baltimore City, Cincinnati, Detroit, and Philadelphia),<br />

or less than 1 percent of admissi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(Maryland, New York City, Bost<strong>on</strong>, Maine, and<br />

Miami/Dade County) were for primary methamphetamine<br />

abuse (table 10). On the other hand,<br />

six areas—Minneapolis/St. Paul, Atlanta, Texas,<br />

Seattle, Denver, and Colorado—reported that<br />

between 5 and 16 percent of primary treatment<br />

admissi<strong>on</strong>s were for methamphetamine abuse<br />

problems in this reporting period.<br />

Forensic Laboratory Data <strong>on</strong><br />

Methamphetamine<br />

In the first half of 2008, forensic laboratory data<br />

for <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> reporting areas (figure 18 and <strong>on</strong> the<br />

map in secti<strong>on</strong> II, figure 12) show that methamphetamine<br />

was the drug identified most frequently<br />

in H<strong>on</strong>olulu (42.5 percent of total drug<br />

items). Items c<strong>on</strong>taining methamphetamine were<br />

next most frequently identified am<strong>on</strong>g total drug<br />

items in Minneapolis/St. Paul (26.9 percent),<br />

Phoenix (22.6 percent), San Diego (20.4 percent),<br />

and Albuquerque (20.3 percent) (figure 18). In<br />

nine of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> reporting areas, less than 2<br />

percent of the total drug items c<strong>on</strong>tained methamphetamine;<br />

all were in areas east of the Mississippi<br />

River (figure 18; appendix table 2).<br />

Methamphetamine ranked first in drug items<br />

identified in H<strong>on</strong>olulu; sec<strong>on</strong>d in Atlanta, Phoenix,<br />

and San Diego; and third in seven <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

areas—Minneapolis/St. Paul, Albuquerque, Denver,<br />

Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seatttle, and<br />

Texas in this reporting period (secti<strong>on</strong> II, table 1).<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g> 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!