05.11.2014 Views

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

CEWG January 09 Full Report - National Institute on Drug Abuse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EpidEmiologic TrEnds in drug AbusE: HigHligHTs And ExEcuTivE summAry<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas, where this form of heroin predominates<br />

in the drug markets (figure 17). The highest<br />

purity levels were reported in 2007 in Phoenix<br />

and Denver (56.9 and 47.6 percent, respectively),<br />

and the lowest were reported in Houst<strong>on</strong> and San<br />

Ant<strong>on</strong>io (7.0 and 7.1 percent, respectively).<br />

From 2006 to 2007, Mexican heroin average<br />

purity declined in five <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas, namely San<br />

Diego, El Paso, San Ant<strong>on</strong>io, Houst<strong>on</strong>, and San<br />

Francisco. Average purity increased in four areas<br />

(Phoenix, Denver, Dallas, and Seattle), between<br />

2.3 and 11.5 percentage points, and remained<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stant in <strong>on</strong>e area (Los Angeles) (table 6).<br />

The average price per milligram pure of Mexican<br />

black tar heroin ranged in 2007 from a low<br />

of $0.20 in San Diego to a high of $1.88 in San<br />

Ant<strong>on</strong>io. The average price was lower or the same<br />

in 2007, compared with 2006, in 7 of 10 reporting<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas (Seattle, Phoenix, Denver, San<br />

Diego, Los Angeles, Dallas, and Houst<strong>on</strong>), but<br />

was higher in El Paso, San Ant<strong>on</strong>io, and San Francisco.<br />

The prices approximately doubled over the<br />

1-year period in San Ant<strong>on</strong>io and San Francisco<br />

(table 6).<br />

Table 5.<br />

Average Percent Purity and Average Price per Milligram Pure in Dollars of South American (SA)<br />

Heroin in 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> Areas, Ordered by Highest Average Purity in 2007: 2004–2007<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Areas<br />

2004<br />

Avg.<br />

Purity<br />

2004<br />

Avg.<br />

Price<br />

2005<br />

Avg.<br />

Purity<br />

2005<br />

Avg.<br />

Price<br />

2006<br />

Avg.<br />

Purity<br />

2006<br />

Avg.<br />

Price<br />

2007<br />

Avg.<br />

Purity<br />

2007<br />

Avg.<br />

Price<br />

Philadelphia 51.6 $0.71 54.9 $0.58 54.9 $0.63 56.3 $0.71<br />

New York City 43.3 $0.62 49.4 $0.46 44.5 $0.67 49.0 $0.79<br />

Detroit 38.9 $0.86 46.6 $0.76 41.4 $0.76 46.0 $0.98<br />

Atlanta 40.9 $2.30 39.3 $2.04 39.1 $2.34 29.1 $1.89<br />

Chicago 13.8 $0.56 17.1 $0.45 12.6 $0.49 22.4 $0.45<br />

St. Louis 1 NR 2 NR 28.3 $1.00 17.6 $1.22 21.0 $0.80<br />

Wash., DC 15.6 $1.06 20.2 $0.95 11.7 $1.42 19.5 $1.34<br />

Miami 15.7 $1.53 19.4 $1.36 24.4 $1.75 18.1 $1.48<br />

Baltimore 27.5 $0.50 29.1 $0.54 31.0 $0.46 18.1 $0.60<br />

NR NR<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong> 27.8 $0.87 29.4 $0.88 18.2 $1.63 17.0 $1.37<br />

1<br />

In 2005, SA rather than Mexican heroin emerged for the first time as the predominant form of heroin in St. Louis. However, in 2006, Mexican <br />

heroin reestablished itself as the predominant form. In 2007, SA heroin was again the predominant form purchased in St. Louis. Therefore, <br />

while data are reported for St. Louis in both SA heroin and Mexican heroin tables (tables 5 and 6), <strong>on</strong>ly St. Louis SA heroin purchases are <br />

discussed in the text. <br />

2<br />

NR = Not reported by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>CEWG</str<strong>on</strong>g> area representative.<br />

SOURCE: DEA, 2007 HDMP <strong>Drug</strong> Intelligence <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, published November 2008<br />

82<br />

Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, <str<strong>on</strong>g>January</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20<str<strong>on</strong>g>09</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!