06.11.2014 Views

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Detection Trial) Act 2003 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Detection Trial) Act 2003 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Detection Trial) Act 2003 - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>of</strong>ficer will <strong>the</strong>n stop each vehicle directing it to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predetermined check points. Every<br />

vehicle should be stopped in a safe manner and in accordance with <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Motor Vehicle Stopping<br />

Techniques and Procedures. 168 [Emphasis added.]<br />

It is not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r during <strong>the</strong> above operation police actually stopped vehicles in <strong>the</strong> search area and <strong>the</strong>reafter<br />

directed <strong>the</strong>m to a check point. However, if police did stop vehicles in this manner, it is our view that this practice was<br />

not sanctioned by <strong>the</strong> power to stop a vehicle under section 9(1).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, it is our view that it would be undesirable for police to use o<strong>the</strong>r random vehicle stop powers — such as <strong>the</strong><br />

power to stop a vehicle to conduct random breath testing — when <strong>the</strong> real purpose is to stop <strong>the</strong> vehicle so that<br />

it can be directed to a check point for screening. This is because <strong>the</strong> power to stop a vehicle to conduct random<br />

breath testing appears to limit or confine <strong>the</strong> purpose for which <strong>the</strong> stop power can be used. Relevantly, section 13(4)<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) <strong>Act</strong> 1999 provides:<br />

Without limiting any o<strong>the</strong>r power or authority, a police <strong>of</strong>ficer may, for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this section, request or<br />

signal <strong>the</strong> driver <strong>of</strong> a motor vehicle to stop <strong>the</strong> vehicle. [Emphasis added.]<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> any power for an ulterior purpose may expose police to <strong>the</strong> allegation that <strong>the</strong> power<br />

was not exercised in good faith, or was improper, or unlawful, which could potentially lead to <strong>the</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> any<br />

evidence obtained. 169<br />

Ombudsman observers attended one mobile operation and noted <strong>the</strong> following practice:<br />

Case study 3<br />

Mobile operation 170<br />

<strong>Police</strong> in sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>NSW</strong> conducted a mobile operation along a major highway. Two highway patrol vehicles were<br />

deployed both within and outside <strong>the</strong> search area to identify vehicles to be stopped. The highway patrol <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

would target particular vehicles based on intelligence about drug couriers, radio checks and o<strong>the</strong>r observations.<br />

Once identifying a vehicle, <strong>the</strong> highway patrol <strong>of</strong>ficers would follow <strong>the</strong> vehicle until it approached <strong>the</strong> unattended<br />

check point, which consisted <strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> a 500-metre stretch <strong>of</strong> highway where <strong>the</strong> speed limit was 80km/h.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> would <strong>the</strong>n activate <strong>the</strong>ir warning devices (lights and sirens) indicating to <strong>the</strong> driver <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vehicle to pull<br />

over. Once <strong>the</strong> vehicle came to a halt, <strong>the</strong> highway patrol <strong>of</strong>ficers established a safety zone around <strong>the</strong> stopped<br />

vehicle by placing traffic cones (witches hats) around it. In addition, <strong>the</strong> warning lights on <strong>the</strong> highway patrol<br />

vehicles continued to alert o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> police.<br />

Shortly after <strong>the</strong> vehicle had been stopped, an additional four police <strong>of</strong>ficers and <strong>the</strong> drug detection dog, who<br />

were located out <strong>of</strong> sight in streets adjacent to <strong>the</strong> check point, attended <strong>the</strong> site, screened <strong>the</strong> vehicle, and<br />

conducted searches when required. No safety concerns were noted during this operation. In addition, no drugs<br />

were seized during <strong>the</strong> operation.<br />

4.2.1.2. Establishing a check point<br />

According to police, <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> mobile operations hinged on <strong>the</strong>ir capacity to maintain minimal visible<br />

presence during operations. The utilisation <strong>of</strong> unattended check points, as illustrated in <strong>the</strong> above case study,<br />

ensured that <strong>the</strong> nature and location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operation were not easily discernable to vehicles travelling through <strong>the</strong><br />

search area.<br />

However, some police raised questions about what <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a check point entails. For example, does <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> a check point require police to remain at <strong>the</strong> check point for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> stopping vehicles, or<br />

can police establish a check point, and <strong>the</strong>reafter remove <strong>the</strong>mselves from <strong>the</strong> check point until a vehicle is stopped<br />

at, or directed to <strong>the</strong> check point?<br />

On <strong>the</strong> one hand, it may be argued that to establish a check point police must remain at <strong>the</strong> check point. For<br />

example, section 10 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Detection</strong> <strong>Trial</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, which deals with check points, provides:<br />

(1) A police <strong>of</strong>ficer may, at any time during <strong>the</strong> period in which an authorisation remains in force, remove a<br />

check point from one location and re-establish it at any o<strong>the</strong>r location in <strong>the</strong> search area.<br />

(2) A police <strong>of</strong>ficer who establishes a check point must ensure that adequate measures are taken to ensure <strong>the</strong><br />

safety <strong>of</strong> persons and vehicles approaching <strong>the</strong> check point.<br />

34<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Detection</strong> <strong>Trial</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!