08.11.2014 Views

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 5.11 <strong>The</strong> motif of uprightness <strong>in</strong> hom<strong>in</strong>id skulls. A range of hom<strong>in</strong>id skulls from australopithec<strong>in</strong>e to<br />

modern Homo, show<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g verticality of the skull and retention of juvenile traits. Each grade<br />

shows types which are closer to the modern human profile and others that are more robust band significantly<br />

further removed from this juvenile archetype (diagram adapted and updated from Schad, 1985).<br />

a change from more apelike to more human forms. Between the typological stages there<br />

is no obvious direct genetic cont<strong>in</strong>uity. This second discont<strong>in</strong>uous rhythm of evolution<br />

could be said to flow <strong>in</strong> the opposite direction of the first. <strong>The</strong> second trend works, as it<br />

were, out of the future and creates morphologically ever-younger forms. <strong>The</strong> first trend,<br />

that which has to do with the maturation process, clearly works out of the past and has<br />

a direct causal nature. Tak<strong>in</strong>g the juvenile Homo sapiens-like form as a measure, Schad<br />

transformed Sch<strong>in</strong>dewolf’s diagram (Fig. 5.10) to show the nature of these two streams<br />

more clearly (Fig. 5.11).<br />

As we now know, the l<strong>in</strong>eage of modern humans, once thought to be at the top<br />

of the trunk of the tree of life, actually resembles a complex bush. S<strong>in</strong>ce all the known<br />

grades overlap with each other, the actual genetic l<strong>in</strong>eage rema<strong>in</strong>s largely unclear. It is<br />

likely to have proceeded amongst those hom<strong>in</strong>ids nearest the branch<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts and the<br />

mechanism by which the mutations that led to new speciation occurred was most likely <strong>in</strong><br />

that archetypal phase of ontological development, namely <strong>in</strong> the embryo. Heterochronous<br />

events <strong>in</strong> the embryonic development, probably caused at the genetic level by the<br />

retardation or acceleration of aspects of growth, led to the morphological changes. At the<br />

cultural/behavioral level, similar variation, <strong>in</strong> particular prolong<strong>in</strong>g of developmental<br />

stages, enabled hom<strong>in</strong>ids to become human by extend<strong>in</strong>g the period of protection from<br />

selectionary pressure long enough for the formative forces to free themselves for higher<br />

development.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!