08.11.2014 Views

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

completeness of a biface. Just as the basic tool elements of po<strong>in</strong>t, cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge, lever and<br />

hammer, whilst be<strong>in</strong>g represented by <strong>in</strong>dividual specialized stone flake-tools, are all<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the hand-axe, the truly universal tool, so too a cognitive archetype of spatial<br />

orientation evolved of which the biface itself is the fullest expression.<br />

It has often been observed that large numbers of bifaces litter the sites where<br />

they are found. It seems that they were produced <strong>in</strong> large numbers and discarded before<br />

they were “worn out.” A recent report on the Boxgrove site <strong>in</strong> Sussex describes exactly<br />

this situation: “<strong>The</strong>y did not bother to use previously discarded tools, all of which were<br />

perfectly sharp. Instead, they seem to have preferred mak<strong>in</strong>g fresh ones. When they had<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ished butcher<strong>in</strong>g, they appear to have thrown them away. <strong>The</strong> rationale beh<strong>in</strong>d this<br />

wasteful behavior is a mystery. <strong>The</strong> raw material for manufactur<strong>in</strong>g cutt<strong>in</strong>g equipment,<br />

fl<strong>in</strong>t, was plentiful and it could well be that the act of mak<strong>in</strong>g cutt<strong>in</strong>g tools was regarded<br />

as such an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of the eat<strong>in</strong>g ritual that tool manufacture occurred irrespective of<br />

whether it was strictly necessary or not the handaxes were discarded at a rate of one or<br />

more per square meter.” 31 <strong>The</strong> hom<strong>in</strong>ids who made these tools were not Homo erectus<br />

but probably Homo heidelbergensis, but the po<strong>in</strong>t about the repetition of activity is<br />

valid. Whether it had anyth<strong>in</strong>g to do with eat<strong>in</strong>g rituals is beside the po<strong>in</strong>t. What comes<br />

to expression through this apparently unnecessary activity relates to a more profound<br />

<strong>in</strong>ner need.<br />

We know from modern studies of neural development <strong>in</strong> children, that such a<br />

process of orientation corresponds to a mental framework which is based on a neural<br />

substrat, a network of neural connections fixed and re<strong>in</strong>forced through the myel<strong>in</strong>ization<br />

process <strong>in</strong> which the connections between related neurons are strengthened through the<br />

growth of a fatty sheath along the axons l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g the neurons. Children create and perfect<br />

this mental framework through regular repetition and practice of specific movements,<br />

by endlessly mov<strong>in</strong>g around, stoop<strong>in</strong>g, stand<strong>in</strong>g up, repeat<strong>in</strong>g manual skills , build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

towers of play-blocks, lett<strong>in</strong>g them fall and start<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong> spatial relationships<br />

are explored and practiced with a devotion and repetition rare at any other age. <strong>The</strong><br />

spatial-explor<strong>in</strong>g, orientation phase of childhood corresponds well with the Homo<br />

erectus stage of humank<strong>in</strong>d, which is not of course to imag<strong>in</strong>e erectus people as threeyear-old<br />

toddlers , they would not have lasted long on the savannah. At an imag<strong>in</strong>ative,<br />

qualitative level there is an element of recapitulation , though <strong>in</strong> the modern child at a<br />

higher metamorphosed level. <strong>The</strong> similarity lies at the level of will activity. Here we can<br />

experience the formative, creative forces work<strong>in</strong>g to shape and structure the cerebral<br />

<strong>in</strong>strument that later, with the emergence of the <strong>in</strong>dividualized soul faculties, will give<br />

expression to thoughts and ideas. As such the biface is someth<strong>in</strong>g qu<strong>in</strong>tessentially human,<br />

an archetypal form express<strong>in</strong>g, perhaps, the as yet undifferentiated, three-dimensional<br />

unity of the human soul.<br />

A New Technique Appears on the Scene<br />

<strong>The</strong> curious th<strong>in</strong>g is that around 250,000 years ago the descendants of erectus,<br />

Homo heidelbergensis or Neanderthals, began to make bifaces with much the same form<br />

but with a radically different method. Instead of choos<strong>in</strong>g a suitably sized blank and<br />

knock<strong>in</strong>g off the flakes around the edges until the desired shape was arrived at, the flakes<br />

themselves, <strong>in</strong>stead of be<strong>in</strong>g seen as waste, became the basis for the tools themselves<br />

_________________________<br />

31<br />

See report <strong>in</strong> Independent, August 27, 1995.<br />

190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!