08.11.2014 Views

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

The Spirit in Human Evolution - Waldorf Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Powerful Rhythmic System<br />

Perhaps one should see this typical Neanderthal feature as expressive of a<br />

powerful rhythmic system. <strong>The</strong> broad, barrel-shaped chest and wide shoulders are also<br />

<strong>in</strong>dications of a powerful respiratory system. <strong>The</strong> human head reflects the threefold<br />

dynamic of the whole body, compris<strong>in</strong>g the nerve-sense organs, rhythmic breathcirculatory<br />

system and the metabolic-limb system. In the head these three elements<br />

are comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the domed cranium and ma<strong>in</strong> sense organs, the mid-face respiratory<br />

organs and the lower jaw, the most limb-like part of the head. Perhaps the dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />

of the Neanderthal’s rhythmic system is reflected <strong>in</strong> the prom<strong>in</strong>ence of the mid-face. In<br />

modern human anatomy this threefold dynamic has a more balanced proportion, with the<br />

prom<strong>in</strong>ent and high forehead balanced by the ch<strong>in</strong>, a feature unique to modern humans<br />

(though present <strong>in</strong> reduced form <strong>in</strong> some Neanderthal specimens).<br />

<strong>The</strong> architecture of the face reflects structural forces, such as the anchor<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

face bones and the tooth arches, tooth root size and the thickness of the bone itself. It<br />

also reflects the constitution of the whole organism, as <strong>in</strong>deed any part reflects to some<br />

extent the morphology of the whole. Were this not the case, it would be impossible to<br />

reconstruct skulls or whole skeletons on the basis of fragments.<br />

Neanderthal Bra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Perhaps the most enigmatic feature of Neanderthal skulls is what was <strong>in</strong>side<br />

them. Bra<strong>in</strong>s were well with<strong>in</strong> the range of modern bra<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>in</strong> a number of cases<br />

actually larger <strong>in</strong> terms of estimated volume. Modern bra<strong>in</strong>s average between 1,2001,500<br />

ml <strong>in</strong> volume. Neanderthal females average 1,300 ml and males 1,600 ml, the Amud<br />

man possess<strong>in</strong>g 1,740 ml. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, early European and Asian Moderns also had<br />

larger bra<strong>in</strong>s than “modern” Moderns. From the po<strong>in</strong>t of view of cerebral dom<strong>in</strong>ance,<br />

Neanderthals show the same proportional hemispheric dom<strong>in</strong>ance as modern people,<br />

which suggests a similar preponderance of right-handed people. It is assumed that this<br />

large bra<strong>in</strong> capacity had more to do with their generally large body-mass, and may also<br />

be seen as a further cold-climate adaptation. However, it is not possible to <strong>in</strong>fer anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about <strong>in</strong>telligence from bra<strong>in</strong> size at this level, except that, simply by virtue of possess<strong>in</strong>g<br />

such a large bra<strong>in</strong>, we can only conclude that Neanderthals had as much neural potential<br />

as we have. How they applied it can only be deduced from what archeology tells us of<br />

their life-styles. Even then we should be cautious about equat<strong>in</strong>g technical skills with<br />

the range of faculties a bra<strong>in</strong> can provide. In the end we simply do not know what went<br />

on <strong>in</strong> those bra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Stature<br />

Neanderthals were powerfully built, though relatively short and stocky. Men were<br />

on average about 5’ 6” (169 cm), women about 5’ 3” (160 cm), the tallest known be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about 5’ 10” (179 cm). Relative to modern humans of the same height they were probably<br />

heavier, exclud<strong>in</strong>g overweight Europeans and Americans! <strong>The</strong>ir limbs were also on the<br />

whole shorter. This anatomy seems well adapted to cold conditions <strong>in</strong> that it m<strong>in</strong>imizes<br />

surface area. In an abstract sense the Neanderthal gestalt tended to the spherical, while<br />

the Moderns tend towards a more vertically stretched out gestalt.<br />

By modern standards they were clearly extremely strong. <strong>The</strong>ir jo<strong>in</strong>ts were thick<br />

and their bones generally far more robust than our more delicate skeleton. <strong>The</strong>ir hands<br />

were particularly strong, the last f<strong>in</strong>ger bones very broad. Though hav<strong>in</strong>g a very strong<br />

grip, their f<strong>in</strong>gers were also capable of f<strong>in</strong>e precision work. In short, they were built for<br />

230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!