03.11.2012 Views

Comparative day/night metatranscriptomic analysis of microbial ...

Comparative day/night metatranscriptomic analysis of microbial ...

Comparative day/night metatranscriptomic analysis of microbial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1362 R. S. Poretsky et al.<br />

A<br />

16S rRNA<br />

genes<br />

mRNA<br />

B<br />

16S rRNA<br />

genes<br />

mRNA<br />

Och 114 and Silicibacter sp. TM1040 (Table 1 and Fig. 4).<br />

These assignments do not imply that these actual species<br />

were present at the time <strong>of</strong> sample collection, but rather<br />

they represent the best current sequence matches for<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the more abundant environmental transcripts.<br />

Transcriptome coverage<br />

Cyanobacteria<br />

18 %<br />

Cyanobacteria<br />

55 %<br />

Cyanobacteria<br />

21 %<br />

Cyanobacteria<br />

56 %<br />

Other<br />

82%<br />

Other<br />

45%<br />

Other<br />

79%<br />

Other<br />

44%<br />

To estimate transcriptome coverage, 16S rRNA clone<br />

library data were used to establish a taxon-abundance<br />

model for the HOT community at an identity level <strong>of</strong> 99%.<br />

Assuming that each taxon expresses 1000 different<br />

genes at any given time (based on the Escherichia coli<br />

model; Ingraham et al., 1983) and that genome coverage<br />

Cyanobacteria<br />

Alphaproteobacteria<br />

Gammaproteobacteria<br />

Betaproteobacteria<br />

Deltaproteobacteria<br />

Epsilonproteobacteria<br />

Other Proteobacteria<br />

Actinobacteria<br />

Bacteroidetes<br />

Chlamydiae<br />

Chlorobi<br />

Chlor<strong>of</strong>lexi<br />

Chrysiogenetes<br />

Acidobacteria<br />

Firmicutes<br />

Lentispaerae<br />

Planctomycetes<br />

Spirochaetes<br />

Thermotogae<br />

Verrucomicrobia<br />

Fig. 3. Contribution <strong>of</strong> taxa to the 16S rRNA amplicon pool and transcript pool for the <strong>day</strong> (A) and <strong>night</strong> (B) samples. Taxonomy is presented<br />

to the phylum level (based on NCBI taxonomy) except for Proteobacteria, which is at the subphylum level. The dashed red lines indicate<br />

cyanobacterial abundance in the <strong>night</strong> sample as determined by flow cytometric counting.<br />

follows a Lander–Waterman model (Lander and Waterman,<br />

1988), we estimate that the most abundant taxon in<br />

the <strong>day</strong> or <strong>night</strong> sample had over 90% transcriptome<br />

coverage (i.e. 90% <strong>of</strong> the expressed genes were<br />

sequenced at least once), while the 15 most abundant<br />

taxa had more than half <strong>of</strong> their transcriptome represented<br />

(Table S2). Alternately, we determined the singletons<br />

and doubletons among the COG categories (i.e. the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> COGs containing only one or two sequences)<br />

and applied the Chao1 index <strong>of</strong> diversity to determine the<br />

theoretical abundance <strong>of</strong> COGs in the <strong>day</strong> and <strong>night</strong>. The<br />

sequencing effort captured about 80% <strong>of</strong> the COGs predicted<br />

to be present in the <strong>night</strong> transcriptome and 70% <strong>of</strong><br />

the COGs predicted for the <strong>day</strong> transcriptome (Table S2).<br />

© 2009 The Authors<br />

Journal compilation © 2009 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 11, 1358–1375

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!