The USACE estimate for construction management in Reach B is nearly three times higher than the <strong>SAFCA</strong> estimate. Given the availability of actual costs for this activity covering most of the construction work in this reach, the basis for this difference is unclear. 14
3.2.9 Summary – Reach B When totaled, the cost estimates for each of the project accounts described above result in the USACE estimate for the NED Plan being approximately $76 million higher than the <strong>SAFCA</strong> estimate for the 200-year project in Reach B. The USACE estimates for lands and damages, levee and floodwall construction, and construction management account for the majority of this difference. Tables 2A and 2B provide a detailed comparison of the costs of the <strong>SAFCA</strong> 200-year project and the USACE NED Plan in this reach. Table 2A: Reach B comparison of the <strong>SAFCA</strong> 200-year project and the USACE NED. 200 Year USACE ‐ NED Reach B Cost ($) Cont. ($) Cont. (%) Year Built Escalation Fish & Wildlife Facilities $21,177,372 $940,988 $0 $22,118,360 $1,862,000 $15,000 1% $1,877,000 Mitigation Site Development $11,131,509 $556,575 5% $11,688,084 Long‐Term Management $2,357,606 $0 0% $2,357,606 Land Acquisition $7,688,257 $384,413 5% $8,072,670 <strong>Levee</strong>s & Floodwalls $49,150,178 $4,177,601 $363,075 $53,690,854 $63,286,000 $9,998,000 16% $73,284,000 SREL 2B ‐ <strong>Levee</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong>s $18,264,844 $913,242 5% $19,178,087 SREL Phase 2B <strong>Levee</strong> Drainage $194,673 $9,734 5% $204,407 SREL 2B ‐ Borrow Royalty/Land $1,655,000 $82,750 5% $1,737,750 SREL 2B ‐ Airport North Borrow Sites Development $3,940,000 $197,000 5% $4,137,000 SREL 3 ‐ <strong>Levee</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> $10,141,445 $1,014,145 10% $11,155,590 SREL 3 ‐ <strong>Levee</strong> Drainage $244,130 $24,413 10% $268,543 SREL 3 ‐ Borrow Site Development $10,057,000 $1,005,700 10% $11,062,700 STA 653+00 to End Reach B ‐ <strong>Levee</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> $3,562,086 $712,417 20% 2013 $277,945 $4,552,448 STA 653+00 to End Reach B ‐ Borrow Site Dev. $1,091,000 $218,200 20% 2013 $85,129 $1,394,329 Internal Drainage Pumping Plants $6,951,000 $1,390,200 $395,712 $8,736,912 $13,840,000 $3,375,000 24% $17,215,000 Pumping Plant 5 1 $3,701,000 $740,200 20% 2012 $142,118 $4,583,318 Pumping Plant 3 1 $3,250,000 $650,000 20% 2013 $253,594 $4,153,594 Subtotal Construction Costs $77,278,550 $6,508,789 $758,787 $84,546,126 $78,988,000 $13,388,000 $92,376,000 Total ($) Cost ($) Cont. ($) Cont. (%) Total ($) 15
- Page 1 and 2: Natomas Levee Improvement Program S
- Page 3 and 4: 3.4.1 Fish and Wildlife Facilities.
- Page 5 and 6: 1 Background and Purpose The purpos
- Page 7 and 8: 2.2 Levees and Floodwalls This acco
- Page 9 and 10: will be performed by USACE. The USA
- Page 11 and 12: 3 Comparison to USACE NED Plan by R
- Page 13 and 14: 3.1.5 Relocations SAFCA’s estim
- Page 15 and 16: 3.2 Reach B (Sacramento River East
- Page 17: incurred to date and projections fo
- Page 21 and 22: 3.3 Reach C (Sacramento River East
- Page 23 and 24: efforts to comply with evolving fed
- Page 25 and 26: 3.4 Reach D (Natomas Cross Canal) R
- Page 27 and 28: 3.4.8 Construction Management SAF
- Page 29 and 30: 3.5 Reach E (Pleasant Grove Creek C
- Page 31 and 32: 3.5.8 Summary - Reach E When totale
- Page 33 and 34: SAFCA’s estimate also includes co
- Page 35 and 36: 3.7 Reach G (NEMDC from Elverta Roa
- Page 37 and 38: 3.7.9 Summary - Reach G When totale
- Page 39 and 40: 3.8.4 Lands & Damages A small amou
- Page 41 and 42: 3.9 Reach I (American River North L
- Page 43 and 44: 3.9.9 Summary - Reach I When totale
- Page 45 and 46: Table 10: Total Program comparison
- Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX A
- Page 49 and 50: Revised Draft NLIP Mitigation Const
- Page 51 and 52: Revised Draft NLIP Mitigation Const
- Page 53 and 54: Revised Draft NLIP Mitigation Const
- Page 62 and 63: REACH D ATTACHMENT 1 SAFCA - NLIP P
- Page 64 and 65: REACH E SAFCA - NLIP PROGRAM DWR 20
- Page 66 and 67: REACH G ATTACHMENT 1 SAFCA - NLIP P
- Page 68 and 69:
ATTACHMENT 2
- Page 70 and 71:
ATTACHMENT 2
- Page 72 and 73:
ATTACHMENT 2
- Page 74 and 75:
Technical Evaluation DISCUSSION OF
- Page 76 and 77:
Technical Evaluation 2.1 Reach C 2.
- Page 78 and 79:
Technical Evaluation 2.3.2 Assumpti
- Page 80 and 81:
Technical Evaluation TABLE 1 Sacram
- Page 82 and 83:
USACE - Sacramento District Natomas
- Page 84 and 85:
USACE - Sacramento District Natomas
- Page 86 and 87:
Summary of HDR Costs Total Costs Re
- Page 88 and 89:
NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11 2.4.8 C
- Page 90 and 91:
NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11 11.1.33
- Page 92 and 93:
NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11 Elkhorn
- Page 94 and 95:
Reach C NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11
- Page 96 and 97:
NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11 11.5.23
- Page 98 and 99:
NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11 2.3 SRE
- Page 100 and 101:
Reach I NLIP Cost Estimate 01/13/11
- Page 102:
Technical Evaluation APPENDIX B Sac
- Page 115 and 116:
Technical Memorandum (DRAFT) To: Jo
- Page 117 and 118:
Sacramento River. There are a total
- Page 119 and 120:
South Sutter The portion of the Sou
- Page 121 and 122:
The structure demolition and tree r
- Page 123 and 124:
Riverside Canal, approximately 230
- Page 125 and 126:
epositioning of the existing pump o
- Page 127 and 128:
Airport North Site 4 Airport North
- Page 129 and 130:
feet of levee crown will be removed
- Page 131 and 132:
4.3.4 NCMWC Elkhorn Canal The total
- Page 133 and 134:
the PGCC could be constructed with
- Page 135 and 136:
6.2 Relocations 6.2.1 RD 1000 Facil
- Page 137 and 138:
Krumenacher The Krumenacher propert
- Page 139 and 140:
pump discharge pipes, the bike trai
- Page 141 and 142:
Canal. Two concrete arch culverts w
- Page 143 and 144:
Reach G Levees and Floodwalls Borro
- Page 145 and 146:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 147 and 148:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 149 and 150:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 151 and 152:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 154:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 159 and 160:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 161 and 162:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 163 and 164:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 165 and 166:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 168 and 169:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 170 and 171:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 172 and 173:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 174 and 175:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 176 and 177:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 178 and 179:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 180 and 181:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 182 and 183:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 184 and 185:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 186 and 187:
REACH D
- Page 188 and 189:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 191 and 192:
REACH E
- Page 195 and 196:
REACH F
- Page 197 and 198:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 199 and 200:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 201 and 202:
REACH H
- Page 203 and 204:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 205 and 206:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 208 and 209:
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agenc
- Page 210 and 211:
APPENDIX E
- Page 212 and 213:
Borrow Sites The real estate area b
- Page 214 and 215:
Reach G 1. A width of 167 ft and a
- Page 216 and 217:
SAFCA - ACOE REACH A - SR 15 - 20 R
- Page 218 and 219:
SAFCA - ACOE REACH B - SAC RIVER 5B
- Page 220 and 221:
APPROXIMA TE ACQUISITIO N AREA * Le
- Page 222 and 223:
SAFCA - ACOE REACH D - NATOMAS CROS
- Page 224 and 225:
SAFCA - ACOE REACH F - NEMDC (PGCC
- Page 226 and 227:
SAFCA - ACOE REACH H (NEMDC from Pu
- Page 228 and 229:
NAME APN REACH Allegheny 225-0190-0