Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA
Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA
Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.9.4 Lands & Damages<br />
A small amount of residential and commercial land is needed to accommodate the 200-<br />
year project footprint in Reach I. <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of the cost of this land is based on an<br />
opinion of probable value and includes a 10 percent contingency.<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate also includes costs for lands and damages administration that<br />
represent 30 percent of the value of the land acquired.<br />
The USACE estimate for lands and damages including administration is almost two times<br />
higher than <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate. This likely reflects the larger project footprint occupied<br />
by the NED Plan as well as differences in estimated land values.<br />
3.9.5 Relocations<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate includes costs for relocating electrical utility poles and lines along the<br />
landside toe of the levee. This work will be carried out as part of the USACE project. The<br />
estimate is based on design consultant estimates and includes a 30 percent contingency.<br />
The USACE estimate for relocations in this reach is about two times higher than<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate based on the NED Plan’s enlarged footprint.<br />
3.9.6 Planning Design and Engineering<br />
<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate for planning, engineering and design costs in Reach I includes costs<br />
incurred through 2010 and cost projections for completing the engineering and design of<br />
the 200-year project features in this reach. This estimate represents approximately 24<br />
percent of the estimated costs for construction and relocation work. The USACE estimate<br />
for these activities is more than twice as high as <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate, presumably because<br />
of the NED Plan’s larger footprint.<br />
3.9.7 Cultural Resources<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of cultural resources costs for this reach covers potential monitoring<br />
and resource recovery activities. The estimate represents approximately 1.7 percent of<br />
total construction and relocation costs.<br />
The USACE estimate contains only a total cost for cultural resources that is not broken<br />
out by reach.<br />
3.9.8 Construction Management<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of construction management costs represents approximately 16<br />
percent of total construction and relocation costs.<br />
The USACE estimate for construction management in Reach I is comparable to<br />
<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate.<br />
38