11.11.2014 Views

Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA

Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA

Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.9.4 Lands & Damages<br />

A small amount of residential and commercial land is needed to accommodate the 200-<br />

year project footprint in Reach I. <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of the cost of this land is based on an<br />

opinion of probable value and includes a 10 percent contingency.<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate also includes costs for lands and damages administration that<br />

represent 30 percent of the value of the land acquired.<br />

The USACE estimate for lands and damages including administration is almost two times<br />

higher than <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate. This likely reflects the larger project footprint occupied<br />

by the NED Plan as well as differences in estimated land values.<br />

3.9.5 Relocations<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate includes costs for relocating electrical utility poles and lines along the<br />

landside toe of the levee. This work will be carried out as part of the USACE project. The<br />

estimate is based on design consultant estimates and includes a 30 percent contingency.<br />

The USACE estimate for relocations in this reach is about two times higher than<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate based on the NED Plan’s enlarged footprint.<br />

3.9.6 Planning Design and Engineering<br />

<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate for planning, engineering and design costs in Reach I includes costs<br />

incurred through 2010 and cost projections for completing the engineering and design of<br />

the 200-year project features in this reach. This estimate represents approximately 24<br />

percent of the estimated costs for construction and relocation work. The USACE estimate<br />

for these activities is more than twice as high as <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate, presumably because<br />

of the NED Plan’s larger footprint.<br />

3.9.7 Cultural Resources<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of cultural resources costs for this reach covers potential monitoring<br />

and resource recovery activities. The estimate represents approximately 1.7 percent of<br />

total construction and relocation costs.<br />

The USACE estimate contains only a total cost for cultural resources that is not broken<br />

out by reach.<br />

3.9.8 Construction Management<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of construction management costs represents approximately 16<br />

percent of total construction and relocation costs.<br />

The USACE estimate for construction management in Reach I is comparable to<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!