11.11.2014 Views

Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA

Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA

Natomas Levee Improvement Program - SAFCA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate also includes costs for lands and damages administration that<br />

represent about 39 percent of the value of the land acquired.<br />

The USACE estimate for lands and damages including administration is about 4 times<br />

higher than <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate. This likely reflects a difference in the amount of land to<br />

be acquired, however the basis for this difference is not clarified in the PACR.<br />

3.5.4 Relocations<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate includes costs for relocating several private irrigation wells; relocating<br />

approximately 35 electrical utility poles and lines; raising the Howsley Road and Fifield<br />

Road bridges; reconstructing the roadway on top of the levee; and demolishing five<br />

existing drainage culverts beneath the levee. This work will be carried out as part of the<br />

USACE project. The estimate is based on design consultant estimates and includes a 25<br />

percent contingency.<br />

The USACE estimate for relocations in Reach E is about 20 percent lower than <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s<br />

estimate when contingencies are included.<br />

3.5.5 Planning Design and Engineering<br />

<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate for planning, engineering and design costs in Reach E includes costs<br />

incurred through 2010 and cost projections for engineering and designing the<br />

uncompleted elements of the project in this reach. This estimate represents about 23<br />

percent of the estimated costs for construction and relocation work. The USACE estimate<br />

for these activities is comparable to <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s.<br />

3.5.6 Cultural Resources<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of cultural resources costs for this reach covers potential monitoring<br />

and resource recovery activities. The estimate represents approximately 1.4 percent of<br />

total construction and relocation cost.<br />

The USACE estimate contains only a total cost for cultural resources that is not broken<br />

out by reach.<br />

3.5.7 Construction Management<br />

<strong>SAFCA</strong>’s estimate of construction management costs represents approximately 16<br />

percent of total construction and relocation costs.<br />

The USACE estimate for construction management in Reach E is lower than <strong>SAFCA</strong>’s<br />

estimate. Given the much larger USACE estimates for this activity in other project<br />

reaches, the basis for this difference is unclear.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!