20.11.2014 Views

BMO Financial Group - Outlook 2005(1.1Mb pdf File) - Boardwalk REIT

BMO Financial Group - Outlook 2005(1.1Mb pdf File) - Boardwalk REIT

BMO Financial Group - Outlook 2005(1.1Mb pdf File) - Boardwalk REIT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

Rising interest rates...<br />

10-year Government Note Rate<br />

%<br />

6.0<br />

5.5<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2002:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

2003:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

2004:Q1<br />

...will temper the pace of expansion in <strong>2005</strong>...<br />

Q3<br />

<strong>2005</strong>:Q1<br />

FORECAST<br />

Q3<br />

2006:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

global economy, suggests that the<br />

external sector will add to GDP growth in<br />

<strong>2005</strong> after subtracting from it in 2004.<br />

In addition, though household debt has<br />

risen to a record high relative to personal<br />

incomes, assets have climbed even<br />

faster largely as a result of rising home<br />

prices and recovering equity markets. In<br />

the second quarter of 2004, household<br />

net worth stood at a record high US$45.9<br />

trillion, up 11% from the year-earlier<br />

period and 19% from the recent trough in<br />

the third quarter of 2002. Therefore,<br />

barring a downturn in asset prices, the<br />

so-called “wealth effect” will continue to<br />

support household spending in <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Gross Domestic Product<br />

Q/Q% Change, Annualized<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

2002:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

...though the jobless rate should decline further.<br />

Unemployment Rate<br />

%<br />

6.5<br />

6.0<br />

5.5<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

2002:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

2003:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

Non-inflationary rate<br />

2003:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

2004:Q1<br />

2004:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

Q3<br />

<strong>2005</strong>:Q1<br />

<strong>2005</strong>:Q1<br />

FORECAST<br />

Q3<br />

2006:Q1<br />

FORECAST<br />

Q3<br />

2006:Q1<br />

Q3<br />

Q3<br />

…but joblessness should still fall…<br />

Continued above-potential growth should<br />

allow the unemployment rate to drift<br />

down from an expected 5.4% in the<br />

fourth quarter of 2004 to 5.1% by the end<br />

of <strong>2005</strong> and to 5.0% by late 2006. This<br />

means the economy will be operating at<br />

“full employment” – the jobless rate<br />

associated with stable inflation pressures<br />

in the long run – in about two years time.<br />

…assuming that productivity<br />

moderates<br />

Despite the rapid pace of output growth<br />

in recent years, job growth has been<br />

surprisingly weak. From 2001Q1 to<br />

2004Q2, real GDP expanded 9.1% but<br />

nonfarm payrolls shrank by one million<br />

workers. Firms managed to produce<br />

more output with fewer workers because<br />

of rising productivity. Output-per-hour<br />

worked rose a phenomenal 14.8% over<br />

this 3½-year span. If productivity had<br />

grown a couple of percentage points<br />

less, payrolls would have expanded by<br />

more than one million.<br />

If only because the recent pace is so far<br />

beyond the norm, productivity growth is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!