SPT-Fall2014
SPT-Fall2014
SPT-Fall2014
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Food as an Expression of Our<br />
Early Attachment Relationships<br />
Food and nourishment are<br />
intimately wrapped up with our<br />
earliest relational experiences with<br />
our care givers. Food is never<br />
delivered to babies in a way that is<br />
devoid of relationship. Mamma (or<br />
other primary caregivers) is<br />
synonymous with food and also with<br />
love, comfort, warmth, safety, and<br />
meeting of other needs. If early<br />
beginnings were not so safe, food<br />
may become associated with terror,<br />
overwhelming feelings, and<br />
confusion of trying to regulate the<br />
mother’s feelings in hopes of<br />
connection. Both psychoanalytic and<br />
object relations theory have complex<br />
theories to examine eating<br />
behaviours and these early patterns. I<br />
prefer attachment theory as a way of<br />
understanding the impact of these<br />
formative years on later adult<br />
behaviour. Attachment theory states<br />
that babies will seek and try to<br />
maintain a close proximity to<br />
care-givers and that their<br />
experience of this<br />
relationship will become<br />
internalised as an internal<br />
working model, which they<br />
apply to other significant<br />
relationships in later life<br />
(Wallin, 2007). The not-sonice<br />
experiments by Harry<br />
Harlow on rhesus monkeys<br />
showed how comfort,<br />
attachment, and security<br />
were more important than<br />
milk alone with baby<br />
monkeys choosing a nice,<br />
warm, soft mother rather<br />
than a cold one that only<br />
provided food (Harlow,<br />
1958). From this we can begin to<br />
understand that food is not our<br />
primary drive—comfort and safety<br />
are.<br />
Clinical research has shown that<br />
patients diagnosed with bulimia<br />
nervosa have been found to have a<br />
higher incidence of insecure<br />
attachment styles (Tetzlaff & Hilbert,<br />
2014). If we extrapolate this into<br />
clinical practice it gives a few<br />
important points that can be<br />
incorporated into the<br />
psychotherapeutic relationship. The<br />
role of the therapist, no matter what<br />
orientation, in the beginning stages of<br />
therapy with a BED client, should<br />
focus on containment, creating safe<br />
boundaries, and fostering a secure<br />
attachment for the work to occur<br />
within. A strong-yet-nurturing<br />
container will eventually allow for<br />
the attachment anxiety to be<br />
expressed within the therapeutic<br />
dyad. This can then be challenged<br />
and worked with. In my experience,<br />
clients with BED often have a high<br />
need for a strong-yet-nurturing<br />
relationship that meets their oral<br />
needs before they are willing to<br />
really challenge their eating<br />
behaviours. There is a shadow side of<br />
this relational approach though.<br />
Breaks in the therapeutic relationship<br />
with the therapist may also become a<br />
trigger for binge eating episodes.<br />
This may occur if the therapist<br />
becomes ill, or has to cancel<br />
appointments, or go on holiday. It<br />
may also manifest if clients feel<br />
‘missed’ by the therapist, they may<br />
increase binging behaviour instead of<br />
expressing their negative affect<br />
directly. This doesn’t mean these<br />
occurrences need to be avoided; in<br />
fact, these occurrences generally are<br />
the best opportunities for<br />
illumination and healing to happen if<br />
they are caught and discussed. I<br />
often take a long holiday, and<br />
periodically I go to another country<br />
where contact is very limited with<br />
my clients. In many cases, these<br />
prolonged breaks are both a trigger<br />
for my BED clients, as well as a<br />
helpful catalyst for change when I<br />
return as it becomes a here-and-now<br />
relational opportunity to work<br />
through issues of abandonment,<br />
misattunement, and attachment<br />
anxiety.<br />
Dissociation, Body Awareness, and<br />
Binge-Eating<br />
Dissociation occurs within the binge<br />
cycle (McShane & Zirke, 2008).<br />
There are a few theories around<br />
supporting this finding. The first<br />
theory is that binging provides a<br />
psychological defense mechanism to<br />
bring about dissociation to escape<br />
from the awareness of threatening<br />
stimuli and emotions. The second<br />
theory is that binging occurs because<br />
the person already possesses<br />
dissociative tendencies, culminating<br />
in a skewed awareness of self-image<br />
and body sensations so that he is<br />
more likely to exhibit lack of selfcontrol<br />
and awareness around food<br />
intake (Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &<br />
Mussap, 2008). In a study that<br />
looked at the personality traits of<br />
persons experiencing binging, the<br />
results found that many BED<br />
sufferers in the cohort possessed an<br />
inadequate ability to recognise<br />
emotional states and body sensations<br />
coupled with excessive feelings of<br />
inadequacy, worthlessness, and<br />
insecurity due to their body size<br />
(Izydorczyk, 2013).<br />
The thing I find most interesting in<br />
these theories and findings is the<br />
concept of the lack of awareness of<br />
body sensations and the resultant<br />
Somatic Psychotherapy Today | Fall 2014 | Volume 4 Number 2 | page 49