02.12.2014 Views

SPT-Fall2014

SPT-Fall2014

SPT-Fall2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Food as an Expression of Our<br />

Early Attachment Relationships<br />

Food and nourishment are<br />

intimately wrapped up with our<br />

earliest relational experiences with<br />

our care givers. Food is never<br />

delivered to babies in a way that is<br />

devoid of relationship. Mamma (or<br />

other primary caregivers) is<br />

synonymous with food and also with<br />

love, comfort, warmth, safety, and<br />

meeting of other needs. If early<br />

beginnings were not so safe, food<br />

may become associated with terror,<br />

overwhelming feelings, and<br />

confusion of trying to regulate the<br />

mother’s feelings in hopes of<br />

connection. Both psychoanalytic and<br />

object relations theory have complex<br />

theories to examine eating<br />

behaviours and these early patterns. I<br />

prefer attachment theory as a way of<br />

understanding the impact of these<br />

formative years on later adult<br />

behaviour. Attachment theory states<br />

that babies will seek and try to<br />

maintain a close proximity to<br />

care-givers and that their<br />

experience of this<br />

relationship will become<br />

internalised as an internal<br />

working model, which they<br />

apply to other significant<br />

relationships in later life<br />

(Wallin, 2007). The not-sonice<br />

experiments by Harry<br />

Harlow on rhesus monkeys<br />

showed how comfort,<br />

attachment, and security<br />

were more important than<br />

milk alone with baby<br />

monkeys choosing a nice,<br />

warm, soft mother rather<br />

than a cold one that only<br />

provided food (Harlow,<br />

1958). From this we can begin to<br />

understand that food is not our<br />

primary drive—comfort and safety<br />

are.<br />

Clinical research has shown that<br />

patients diagnosed with bulimia<br />

nervosa have been found to have a<br />

higher incidence of insecure<br />

attachment styles (Tetzlaff & Hilbert,<br />

2014). If we extrapolate this into<br />

clinical practice it gives a few<br />

important points that can be<br />

incorporated into the<br />

psychotherapeutic relationship. The<br />

role of the therapist, no matter what<br />

orientation, in the beginning stages of<br />

therapy with a BED client, should<br />

focus on containment, creating safe<br />

boundaries, and fostering a secure<br />

attachment for the work to occur<br />

within. A strong-yet-nurturing<br />

container will eventually allow for<br />

the attachment anxiety to be<br />

expressed within the therapeutic<br />

dyad. This can then be challenged<br />

and worked with. In my experience,<br />

clients with BED often have a high<br />

need for a strong-yet-nurturing<br />

relationship that meets their oral<br />

needs before they are willing to<br />

really challenge their eating<br />

behaviours. There is a shadow side of<br />

this relational approach though.<br />

Breaks in the therapeutic relationship<br />

with the therapist may also become a<br />

trigger for binge eating episodes.<br />

This may occur if the therapist<br />

becomes ill, or has to cancel<br />

appointments, or go on holiday. It<br />

may also manifest if clients feel<br />

‘missed’ by the therapist, they may<br />

increase binging behaviour instead of<br />

expressing their negative affect<br />

directly. This doesn’t mean these<br />

occurrences need to be avoided; in<br />

fact, these occurrences generally are<br />

the best opportunities for<br />

illumination and healing to happen if<br />

they are caught and discussed. I<br />

often take a long holiday, and<br />

periodically I go to another country<br />

where contact is very limited with<br />

my clients. In many cases, these<br />

prolonged breaks are both a trigger<br />

for my BED clients, as well as a<br />

helpful catalyst for change when I<br />

return as it becomes a here-and-now<br />

relational opportunity to work<br />

through issues of abandonment,<br />

misattunement, and attachment<br />

anxiety.<br />

Dissociation, Body Awareness, and<br />

Binge-Eating<br />

Dissociation occurs within the binge<br />

cycle (McShane & Zirke, 2008).<br />

There are a few theories around<br />

supporting this finding. The first<br />

theory is that binging provides a<br />

psychological defense mechanism to<br />

bring about dissociation to escape<br />

from the awareness of threatening<br />

stimuli and emotions. The second<br />

theory is that binging occurs because<br />

the person already possesses<br />

dissociative tendencies, culminating<br />

in a skewed awareness of self-image<br />

and body sensations so that he is<br />

more likely to exhibit lack of selfcontrol<br />

and awareness around food<br />

intake (Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &<br />

Mussap, 2008). In a study that<br />

looked at the personality traits of<br />

persons experiencing binging, the<br />

results found that many BED<br />

sufferers in the cohort possessed an<br />

inadequate ability to recognise<br />

emotional states and body sensations<br />

coupled with excessive feelings of<br />

inadequacy, worthlessness, and<br />

insecurity due to their body size<br />

(Izydorczyk, 2013).<br />

The thing I find most interesting in<br />

these theories and findings is the<br />

concept of the lack of awareness of<br />

body sensations and the resultant<br />

Somatic Psychotherapy Today | Fall 2014 | Volume 4 Number 2 | page 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!