05.11.2012 Views

Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

acetate on the face and neck versus pimecrolimus, reported equal ef<strong>fi</strong>cacy compared to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the corticosteroid arm. However, no <strong>in</strong>tention-to-treat analysis was done, and the<br />

discont<strong>in</strong>uation rate <strong>in</strong> the pimecrolimus group was 60% (Luger et al. 2004). In studies<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>tacrolimus</strong> and pimecrolimus, <strong>tacrolimus</strong> has shown superior ef<strong>fi</strong>cacy with a<br />

similar adverse-effect pr<strong>of</strong>ile (Paller et al. 2005). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to flare control studies,<br />

pimecrolimus cream seems to work best as a corticosteroid-spar<strong>in</strong>g agent (Kapp et al.<br />

2002, Wahn et al. 2002, Meurer et al. 2002 and 2004, Papp et al. 2005, Siegfried et al.<br />

2006).<br />

Evidence-based treatment <strong>of</strong> AD<br />

AD has undergone various treatments for decades, although evidence-based data on<br />

these treatment modalities is scarce. Evidence-based medic<strong>in</strong>e means treatment based<br />

on suf<strong>fi</strong>cient <strong>in</strong>formation from high-quality trials. Quality requirements <strong>in</strong>clude a welldef<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

and suf<strong>fi</strong>ciently large patient population and well-def<strong>in</strong>ed diagnostic methods<br />

and assessments <strong>of</strong> AD severity and treatment ef<strong>fi</strong>cacy. Studies should also reflect<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical need for treatment so that chronic diseases are <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> long-term studies.<br />

Studies on treatment <strong>of</strong> AD have usually been small <strong>in</strong> patient number, seldom<br />

controlled, or controlled with a poorly validated compound (Hoare et al. 2000).<br />

<strong>Topical</strong> corticosteroids have been studied mostly <strong>in</strong> short-term trials, because no<br />

long-term studies have been required by authorities. The quality <strong>of</strong> the studies varies,<br />

and there are no published placebo-controlled trials for <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> betamethasone 17valerate,<br />

considered a standard comparator for newer topical treatments. However, the<br />

chronic nature <strong>of</strong> AD calls for long-term controlled trials to f<strong>in</strong>d a safe and ef<strong>fi</strong>cient way<br />

to control the disease. Recently three studies have lasted for 4 to 6 months test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance therapy for AD with topical corticosteroids twice weekly with favorable<br />

results (Faergemann 2000, Berth-Jones et al. 2003, Hanif<strong>in</strong> et al. 2002). Intermittent<br />

long-term corticosteroid treatment has been used <strong>in</strong> two randomized controlled studies<br />

last<strong>in</strong>g for 6 months: one with <strong>tacrolimus</strong> o<strong>in</strong>tment and one with pimecrolimus cream<br />

(Reitamo et al. 2005, Luger et al. 2004). At present, these are the only published<br />

corticosteroid controlled long-term studies on the AD treatment.<br />

Data on the placebo-controlled short-term studies and controlled long-term<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> the most common treatments <strong>of</strong> AD are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />

In chronic diseases that can severely impair quality <strong>of</strong> life, such as AD, placebocontrolled<br />

long-term studies without a possibility for rescue therapy are not ethically<br />

acceptable for patients with moderate-to-severe disease. In randomized controlled<br />

studies, the selection criteria for eligible patients are strict, which leads to high<br />

exclusion numbers, and the f<strong>in</strong>al study population will then represent only a few types<br />

<strong>of</strong> the disease. For this reason, generalization <strong>of</strong> the results to population level is<br />

problematic, as patients <strong>in</strong> “real life” present with different types and variable degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> the disease. In the recent years, long-term studies <strong>in</strong> “real-life” sett<strong>in</strong>gs, where effects<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!