Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
physician-diagnosed asthma (2.09 vs. 3.10, n=11, p=0.03). In patients with sputum<br />
eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia at basel<strong>in</strong>e and the best treatment results <strong>in</strong> AD, sputum eos<strong>in</strong>ophils<br />
decreased signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly (n=12, p=0.04). No change <strong>in</strong> the count <strong>of</strong> blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophils as<br />
such was evident (Table 8), but <strong>in</strong> the 18 patients with basel<strong>in</strong>e blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia<br />
(>0.5*10 9 /L), the number <strong>of</strong> blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophils decreased (0.95 vs. 0.66, p=0.003).<br />
Sk<strong>in</strong> prick tests and serum IgE<br />
In Study III, 72 (84%) AD patients and 16 (35%) control subjects showed at least one<br />
positive reaction <strong>in</strong> the SPT, ie. they were classi<strong>fi</strong>ed as hav<strong>in</strong>g IgE-associated or allergic<br />
AD. The SPT- positive AD patients had signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly lower FEV1% than did SPTnegative<br />
patients (94.1 vs. 103.6, p=0.02). Physician-diagnosed asthma (31 vs.1,<br />
p=0.01), allergic rh<strong>in</strong>itis (37 vs. 3, p=0.05), and BHR (40 vs. 3, p=0.02), but not current<br />
airway symptoms or sputum eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia, were signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly more common <strong>in</strong> SPTpositive<br />
AD patients. This was also true for AD patients with <strong>in</strong>creased s-IgE (n=59,<br />
69%) with the exception that <strong>in</strong>creased s-IgE correlated with current nasal symptoms<br />
and sputum eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia.<br />
In Study V, no signi<strong>fi</strong>cant change emerged <strong>in</strong> serum IgE <strong>in</strong> the study population<br />
as such (Table 8). An almost signi<strong>fi</strong>cant decrease <strong>in</strong> serum IgE occurred <strong>in</strong> patients with<br />
elevated serum IgE at basel<strong>in</strong>e and the best treatment results <strong>in</strong> AD (3690 ± 4390 vs.<br />
2233 ± 2120, n= 25, p=0.06, n.s.), whereas <strong>in</strong> patients with a less favorable AD<br />
response, serum IgE <strong>in</strong>creased (3497 ± 5298 vs. 4226 ± 5004, n=22, p=0.10, n.s).<br />
Serum IgE levels at 48 months were similar to the results at 12 months (4113 ± 14905,<br />
n.s. compared with basel<strong>in</strong>e).<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 53 (82%) patients were SPT-positive at basel<strong>in</strong>e. At 12 months, SPT<br />
reactivity had <strong>in</strong>creased signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly, expressed as number (3.9 vs. 4.1, p=0.002) and<br />
sum (21.2 vs. 25.1 p