05.11.2012 Views

Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

Topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis: Effects of ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

physician-diagnosed asthma (2.09 vs. 3.10, n=11, p=0.03). In patients with sputum<br />

eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia at basel<strong>in</strong>e and the best treatment results <strong>in</strong> AD, sputum eos<strong>in</strong>ophils<br />

decreased signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly (n=12, p=0.04). No change <strong>in</strong> the count <strong>of</strong> blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophils as<br />

such was evident (Table 8), but <strong>in</strong> the 18 patients with basel<strong>in</strong>e blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia<br />

(>0.5*10 9 /L), the number <strong>of</strong> blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophils decreased (0.95 vs. 0.66, p=0.003).<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong> prick tests and serum IgE<br />

In Study III, 72 (84%) AD patients and 16 (35%) control subjects showed at least one<br />

positive reaction <strong>in</strong> the SPT, ie. they were classi<strong>fi</strong>ed as hav<strong>in</strong>g IgE-associated or allergic<br />

AD. The SPT- positive AD patients had signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly lower FEV1% than did SPTnegative<br />

patients (94.1 vs. 103.6, p=0.02). Physician-diagnosed asthma (31 vs.1,<br />

p=0.01), allergic rh<strong>in</strong>itis (37 vs. 3, p=0.05), and BHR (40 vs. 3, p=0.02), but not current<br />

airway symptoms or sputum eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia, were signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly more common <strong>in</strong> SPTpositive<br />

AD patients. This was also true for AD patients with <strong>in</strong>creased s-IgE (n=59,<br />

69%) with the exception that <strong>in</strong>creased s-IgE correlated with current nasal symptoms<br />

and sputum eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia.<br />

In Study V, no signi<strong>fi</strong>cant change emerged <strong>in</strong> serum IgE <strong>in</strong> the study population<br />

as such (Table 8). An almost signi<strong>fi</strong>cant decrease <strong>in</strong> serum IgE occurred <strong>in</strong> patients with<br />

elevated serum IgE at basel<strong>in</strong>e and the best treatment results <strong>in</strong> AD (3690 ± 4390 vs.<br />

2233 ± 2120, n= 25, p=0.06, n.s.), whereas <strong>in</strong> patients with a less favorable AD<br />

response, serum IgE <strong>in</strong>creased (3497 ± 5298 vs. 4226 ± 5004, n=22, p=0.10, n.s).<br />

Serum IgE levels at 48 months were similar to the results at 12 months (4113 ± 14905,<br />

n.s. compared with basel<strong>in</strong>e).<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 53 (82%) patients were SPT-positive at basel<strong>in</strong>e. At 12 months, SPT<br />

reactivity had <strong>in</strong>creased signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly, expressed as number (3.9 vs. 4.1, p=0.002) and<br />

sum (21.2 vs. 25.1 p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!