24.12.2014 Views

smash-pacifism-zine

smash-pacifism-zine

smash-pacifism-zine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

these outbreaks, touring riot-torn areas of the city, talking to<br />

community leaders, issuing appeals, and, in one of his first<br />

uses of this technique for political purposes, fasting for five<br />

days to try to restore calm.”<br />

(Gandhi, p. 124)<br />

As many as 10,000 people may have been killed<br />

during the Malabar revolt, primarily rebels repressed by a<br />

brutal British military response which included imposing<br />

martial law and deploying British and Gurkha regiments.<br />

As many as 45,000 were arrested during the six month long<br />

rebellion.<br />

During the November riots in Bombay on<br />

November 17, the khadi-clad demonstrators looted shops,<br />

burned foreign cloth and wrecked automobiles, shouting, as<br />

Gandhi himself witnessed, “Mahatma Gandhi ki jai”<br />

[Victory to Mahatma Gandhi]. “Never,” he wrote later, “has<br />

the sound of these words grated so much in my ears”<br />

(Gandhi: A Life, p. 255).<br />

In response to these rebellions, Gandhi wrote:<br />

“Their violence is likely to alarm us, it impedes our<br />

progress... I can see all the time that the most serious<br />

obstacles in our path come not from the government<br />

but from ourselves... The complete victory of nonviolent<br />

non-cooperation will be possible only if we<br />

conquer this enemy inside us.”<br />

(quotes Collected Works of Mahatma<br />

Gandhi, in India & the Raj, p. 225)<br />

swooped on him and put him behind bars and this action<br />

caused no ripple in the country.”<br />

(History of the Indian Revolutionary Movement, p.<br />

100)<br />

“...many educated leaders believed that Gandhi had<br />

acted impulsively and halted at the very point of success.<br />

Jawaharlal Nehru later wrote: 'We were angry when we<br />

learnt of his stoppage of our struggle at a time when we<br />

seemed to be consolidating our position and advancing on<br />

all fronts.'”<br />

(Indian Nationalism, p. 286)<br />

“To describe Gandhi's decision as a "national<br />

calamity" was indeed right on the mark. To lay such stress<br />

on non-violence - that too only three years after he had<br />

been encouraging Indians to enroll in the British Army was<br />

not only shocking, it showed little sympathy towards the<br />

Indian masses who against all odds had become energized<br />

against their alien oppressors.<br />

“For Gandhi to demand of the poor, downtrodden,<br />

and bitterly exploited Indian masses to first demonstrate<br />

their unmistakable commitment to non-violence before<br />

Clearly, even the messiah-like Gandhi could<br />

not control the rebellious masses. In October 1921,<br />

the British had expanded the level of repression<br />

against the Non-Cooperation Movement with mass<br />

arrests of INC members and banning their meetings.<br />

Despite the spiralling violence, including the huge<br />

riots of November, Gandhi still saw no need to end<br />

the campaign. People were suffering in their quest<br />

for justice, and that was the whole point of Gandhi's<br />

doctrine.<br />

Then, in February 1922, the remote village<br />

of Chauri Chaura was the site of a massacre when<br />

police opened fire, killing several demonstrators. As the<br />

police withdrew to their station, a large mob surrounded it,<br />

setting it on fire. 21 police were burned alive, some being<br />

hacked to death as they attempted to escape.<br />

Gandhi condemned the killings of police in a<br />

statement entitled “The Crime of Chauri Chaura.” He urged<br />

those who killed the police to fast for penance, and to turn<br />

themselves in (none apparently did). He also urged others<br />

to pressure those responsible for the killings to surrender.<br />

The deaths of the police, and not the people, caused Gandhi<br />

to unilaterally declare the campaign over:<br />

“When Gandhi learnt of this, he stopped the<br />

movement without even consulting his colleagues... As<br />

soon as Gandhi withdrew the agitation, the Government<br />

Chauri Chaura, 1922: the burnt corpses of cops killed when a large<br />

mob set fire to their police station in retaliation for a massacre.<br />

their struggle could receive with Gandhi's approval (just a<br />

few years after he had unapologetically defended an<br />

imperial war) was simply unconscionable. Clearly, Gandhi<br />

had one standard for the Indian masses, and quite another<br />

for the nation's colonial overlords. But this was not to be<br />

the first occasion for Gandhi to engage in such tactical and<br />

ideological hypocrisy.”<br />

(“Gandhi - 'Mahatma' or Flawed Genius National<br />

Leader or Manipulative Politician” South Asia Voice,<br />

October 2002 Online edition)<br />

“The... decision caused considerable dismay<br />

among the Congress leaders, most of whom were in prison,<br />

and left the rank and file disgruntled. Subjas Chandra Bose,<br />

who was in jail... wrote afterwards that [the] chance of a<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!