24.12.2014 Views

smash-pacifism-zine

smash-pacifism-zine

smash-pacifism-zine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rebellion in the Ranks:<br />

Pacifists with Guns<br />

While pacifist mythology portrays the Black civil<br />

rights movement as entirely nonviolent, with widespread<br />

acceptance of the doctrine, this was not the case. In fact,<br />

King and other reformists had difficulty persuading people<br />

that <strong>pacifism</strong> was a viable form of resistance.<br />

In a June 1957 speech to students in Berkeley,<br />

California, King noted the difficulty of promoting <strong>pacifism</strong>:<br />

“From the very beginning there was a philosophy<br />

undergirding the Montgomery boycott, the philosophy of<br />

nonviolent resistance. There was always the problem of<br />

getting this method over because it didn't make sense to<br />

most of the people in the beginning. We had to use our<br />

mass meetings to explain nonviolence to a community of<br />

people who had never heard of the<br />

philosophy and in many instances<br />

were not sympathetic to it...”<br />

(I Have a Dream, p. 30)<br />

King had to constantly tone<br />

down his pacifist dogma in the face of<br />

considerable scepticism. In a 1960<br />

article entitled “Pilgrimage to<br />

Nonviolence,” he stated:<br />

“I am no doctrinaire pacifist. I<br />

have tried to embrace realistic<br />

<strong>pacifism</strong>. Moreover, I see the pacifist<br />

position not as sinless but as the lesser<br />

evil in the circumstances.”<br />

(I Have A Dream, p. 61)<br />

Robert Williams and wife Mabel.<br />

More dedicated pacifists found King's initial<br />

commitment to nonviolence questionable. It is worth<br />

quoting again Glenn Smiley's observations on his visit to<br />

Montgomery, during the bus boycott:<br />

“King can be a Negro Gandhi... He had Gandhi in<br />

mind when this thing started, he says... wants to do it right,<br />

but is too young and some of his close help is violent. King<br />

accepts, as an example, a body guard, and asked for a<br />

permit for them to carry guns. This was denied by the<br />

police, but nevertheless, the place is an arsenal... he<br />

believes and yet he doesn't believe. The whole movement is<br />

armed in a sense, and this is what I must convince him to<br />

see as the greatest evil. If he can really be won to a faith in<br />

non-violence, there is no end to what he can do. Soon he<br />

will be able to direct the movement by the sheer force of<br />

being the symbol of resistance.”<br />

(To Redeem the Soul of America, p. 24-25)<br />

Andrew Young, an SCLC member, noted a similar<br />

lack of commitment to <strong>pacifism</strong> among many of the<br />

grassroots participants in the movement:<br />

“Birmingham was 'probably the most violent city<br />

in America,' Young thought, 'and every black family had an<br />

arsenal.' Volunteers for demonstrations had to surrender<br />

their weapons—John Cross remembered collecting 'almost<br />

half a trashcan of knives' one day—and received two hours'<br />

indoctrination into nonviolence. SCLC took great pains to<br />

disown the rowdy spectators, and when they threatened to<br />

get out of control King stopped the demonstrations.”<br />

(To Redeem the Soul of America, p. 138)<br />

During the Albany campaign in July 1962, after<br />

violent clashes erupted during a protest, King sought to<br />

restore order and promote his pacifist doctrine:<br />

“The next morning King read national newspaper<br />

reports placing the blame for Tuesday night's violence<br />

squarely on the shoulders of black protesters. King<br />

immediately called for a 'day of penance'--a twenty-four<br />

moratorium on further demonstrations.<br />

Then he set off on a tour of<br />

the town's pool halls and taverns,<br />

where he cautioned young blacks not<br />

to participate in any further violence.<br />

But many were growing impatient<br />

with King's message of peace. One<br />

reporter who accompanied him on<br />

the tour observed that '[h]e preached<br />

a theme that Albany's restless<br />

Negroes were finding harder and<br />

harder to accept: nonviolence in their<br />

drive to desegregate the town.'”<br />

(The Bystander, p. 320)<br />

As the nonviolent campaign<br />

continued throughout the late 1950s and early '60s,<br />

increasing incidents of conflict between Blacks and racist<br />

whites, including police, began to occur. Reformist<br />

organizers were quick to condemn these and distance<br />

themselves, but it would be a growing concern until the<br />

Birmingham riots of 1963, where the movement leaders<br />

lost the internal struggle over tactics and would never<br />

regain dominance, despite extensive support and sanction<br />

from the state and ruling class.<br />

One of the strongest examples of the total rejection<br />

of nonviolence by civil rights organizers was that of Robert<br />

Williams, a former US Marine:<br />

“In the late 1950s... a renegade local official of the<br />

NAACP named Robert F. Williams had organized a black<br />

rifle club in Monroe, North Carolina, which soon became<br />

an armed self-defense force. The confrontations in Monroe<br />

were somewhat isolated, however, and not well publicized<br />

compared to later episodes of... black violence. The erosion<br />

of the dominance of non-violence over the movement<br />

became more widespread and public after 1963. In 1964<br />

and 1965 rioting would become much more frequent and<br />

serious and self-defense groups would begin to proliferate.”<br />

(Black Radicals and the Civil Rights Mainstream,<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!