smash-pacifism-zine
smash-pacifism-zine
smash-pacifism-zine
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Rebellion in the Ranks:<br />
Pacifists with Guns<br />
While pacifist mythology portrays the Black civil<br />
rights movement as entirely nonviolent, with widespread<br />
acceptance of the doctrine, this was not the case. In fact,<br />
King and other reformists had difficulty persuading people<br />
that <strong>pacifism</strong> was a viable form of resistance.<br />
In a June 1957 speech to students in Berkeley,<br />
California, King noted the difficulty of promoting <strong>pacifism</strong>:<br />
“From the very beginning there was a philosophy<br />
undergirding the Montgomery boycott, the philosophy of<br />
nonviolent resistance. There was always the problem of<br />
getting this method over because it didn't make sense to<br />
most of the people in the beginning. We had to use our<br />
mass meetings to explain nonviolence to a community of<br />
people who had never heard of the<br />
philosophy and in many instances<br />
were not sympathetic to it...”<br />
(I Have a Dream, p. 30)<br />
King had to constantly tone<br />
down his pacifist dogma in the face of<br />
considerable scepticism. In a 1960<br />
article entitled “Pilgrimage to<br />
Nonviolence,” he stated:<br />
“I am no doctrinaire pacifist. I<br />
have tried to embrace realistic<br />
<strong>pacifism</strong>. Moreover, I see the pacifist<br />
position not as sinless but as the lesser<br />
evil in the circumstances.”<br />
(I Have A Dream, p. 61)<br />
Robert Williams and wife Mabel.<br />
More dedicated pacifists found King's initial<br />
commitment to nonviolence questionable. It is worth<br />
quoting again Glenn Smiley's observations on his visit to<br />
Montgomery, during the bus boycott:<br />
“King can be a Negro Gandhi... He had Gandhi in<br />
mind when this thing started, he says... wants to do it right,<br />
but is too young and some of his close help is violent. King<br />
accepts, as an example, a body guard, and asked for a<br />
permit for them to carry guns. This was denied by the<br />
police, but nevertheless, the place is an arsenal... he<br />
believes and yet he doesn't believe. The whole movement is<br />
armed in a sense, and this is what I must convince him to<br />
see as the greatest evil. If he can really be won to a faith in<br />
non-violence, there is no end to what he can do. Soon he<br />
will be able to direct the movement by the sheer force of<br />
being the symbol of resistance.”<br />
(To Redeem the Soul of America, p. 24-25)<br />
Andrew Young, an SCLC member, noted a similar<br />
lack of commitment to <strong>pacifism</strong> among many of the<br />
grassroots participants in the movement:<br />
“Birmingham was 'probably the most violent city<br />
in America,' Young thought, 'and every black family had an<br />
arsenal.' Volunteers for demonstrations had to surrender<br />
their weapons—John Cross remembered collecting 'almost<br />
half a trashcan of knives' one day—and received two hours'<br />
indoctrination into nonviolence. SCLC took great pains to<br />
disown the rowdy spectators, and when they threatened to<br />
get out of control King stopped the demonstrations.”<br />
(To Redeem the Soul of America, p. 138)<br />
During the Albany campaign in July 1962, after<br />
violent clashes erupted during a protest, King sought to<br />
restore order and promote his pacifist doctrine:<br />
“The next morning King read national newspaper<br />
reports placing the blame for Tuesday night's violence<br />
squarely on the shoulders of black protesters. King<br />
immediately called for a 'day of penance'--a twenty-four<br />
moratorium on further demonstrations.<br />
Then he set off on a tour of<br />
the town's pool halls and taverns,<br />
where he cautioned young blacks not<br />
to participate in any further violence.<br />
But many were growing impatient<br />
with King's message of peace. One<br />
reporter who accompanied him on<br />
the tour observed that '[h]e preached<br />
a theme that Albany's restless<br />
Negroes were finding harder and<br />
harder to accept: nonviolence in their<br />
drive to desegregate the town.'”<br />
(The Bystander, p. 320)<br />
As the nonviolent campaign<br />
continued throughout the late 1950s and early '60s,<br />
increasing incidents of conflict between Blacks and racist<br />
whites, including police, began to occur. Reformist<br />
organizers were quick to condemn these and distance<br />
themselves, but it would be a growing concern until the<br />
Birmingham riots of 1963, where the movement leaders<br />
lost the internal struggle over tactics and would never<br />
regain dominance, despite extensive support and sanction<br />
from the state and ruling class.<br />
One of the strongest examples of the total rejection<br />
of nonviolence by civil rights organizers was that of Robert<br />
Williams, a former US Marine:<br />
“In the late 1950s... a renegade local official of the<br />
NAACP named Robert F. Williams had organized a black<br />
rifle club in Monroe, North Carolina, which soon became<br />
an armed self-defense force. The confrontations in Monroe<br />
were somewhat isolated, however, and not well publicized<br />
compared to later episodes of... black violence. The erosion<br />
of the dominance of non-violence over the movement<br />
became more widespread and public after 1963. In 1964<br />
and 1965 rioting would become much more frequent and<br />
serious and self-defense groups would begin to proliferate.”<br />
(Black Radicals and the Civil Rights Mainstream,<br />
63