24.12.2014 Views

smash-pacifism-zine

smash-pacifism-zine

smash-pacifism-zine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dominion status through constitutional reform as a weak<br />

strategy and objective. The Radicals were also referred to<br />

as Extremists, as a smear.<br />

In 1905, the British enacted the Bengal Partition,<br />

dividing the province into two separate ones (East Bengal<br />

and Assam). The partition angered large numbers of<br />

Bengalis, who not only resented the arrogance of the British<br />

but also the loss of political and economic power that<br />

would occur.<br />

The partition was part of a<br />

restructuring of colonial administration,<br />

according to the British. The Bengalis<br />

greeted the official partition in October<br />

1905 as a day of mourning. Daily<br />

protests began and a mass anti-partition<br />

movement emerged. The Bengalis<br />

organized widespread swadeshi<br />

campaigns, meaning “of one's own<br />

country.” Boycotts of British and<br />

European goods were launched,<br />

including cotton products (i.e., clothing<br />

and fabrics), sugar, salt, tobacco, and<br />

leather.<br />

The movement was first<br />

mobilized through newspapers and<br />

public forums, then by public persons<br />

vowing to take part in the boycott, then<br />

by priests directing their temple<br />

members to also participate. Protests<br />

included the public burning of European clothing and<br />

fabrics. The boycott escalated to include pickets of stores<br />

that continued selling European products, then forcible<br />

blockading of stores as well as 'social boycotts' of those<br />

who didn't support the boycott.<br />

Over time, the anti-partition movement included<br />

large numbers of students, particularly in Calcutta and other<br />

cities. The movement also included workers, who carried<br />

out strikes and participated in protests, as well as peasants.<br />

It also contributed to the emergence of a new wave of<br />

revolutionary groups aimed at forcing out the British<br />

through armed struggle (see below).<br />

In 1905, the same year partition came into effect,<br />

the Bengalis attempted to have the INC endorse their<br />

boycott and denounce the partition. The Moderates claimed<br />

it was not related to 'home rule' and opposed the effort.<br />

The Bengalis had the support of the Radicals,<br />

however, who began to promote the Bengali boycott,<br />

expanding the movement into Bombay and then the Punjab<br />

region.<br />

Typically opportunist, the Moderates attempted to<br />

use the mobilization as political capital in their dealings<br />

with the British:<br />

“The Moderates hoped that Morley [British<br />

Secretary of State] would initiate a bold policy of Indian<br />

reform, including the extension of representative<br />

institutions. When Gokhale [a leader in the INC] visited<br />

The proposed Bengal Partition, which<br />

instigated widespread resistance.<br />

Britain in April 1906, he succeeded in extracting promises<br />

from Morley about a new instalment of constitutional<br />

reforms, reduction in military expenditure, increased grants<br />

for education and the abolition of the unpopular salt tax.<br />

However, Morley impressed upon Gokhale the need to keep<br />

the Congress agitation in check, especially over the issue of<br />

[Bengali] partition... Gokhale accepted the force of<br />

Morley's argument and returned to India convinced that the<br />

Congress must eschew extremism in this hour of<br />

opportunity for India.”<br />

(Indian Nationalism, p. 163)<br />

While the Moderates sought<br />

greater concessions from the British<br />

as a result of the Bengali and<br />

Radicals agitation, the Radicals<br />

themselves,<br />

“in contrast, concentrated their<br />

energies in building their strength in<br />

India. Partition still supplied them<br />

with the major grievance to rally<br />

support. Continued British<br />

intransigence on this issue, coupled<br />

with official curbs on the more<br />

extreme forms of Bengali agitation,<br />

had the effect of fuelling the boycott,<br />

swadeshi and national education<br />

movements. Extremist leaders like<br />

Aurobindo and Bipin Chandra Pal<br />

even began to advocate passive disobedience and noncooperation<br />

with the British.”<br />

(Indian Nationalism, p. 163)<br />

Ten years before Gandhi returned to India to<br />

champion nonviolent civil disobedience, boycotts, and<br />

swadeshi, Radicals were already pioneering these methods<br />

and building a mass movement. Their use of nonviolent<br />

methods was clearly tactical, not a religious faith in its<br />

'moral superiority'. At the same time, numerous secret<br />

societies were organized by militants, and training schools<br />

were established to prepare guerrilla fighters.<br />

In 1906, the INC held its national congress in<br />

Calcutta, a major city in Bengal now in the grips of antipartition<br />

rebellion. The Radicals were in a majority and<br />

were able to pass a series of radical resolutions condemning<br />

partition and endorsing the boycott and swadeshi campaign,<br />

against opposition from the Moderates.<br />

By 1907, the Radicals felt confident of being able<br />

to gain control of the INC directly. The Moderates,<br />

however, were able to manoeuvre and have the location of<br />

the congress switched to the city of Surat, where they<br />

enjoyed greater support. There, they were able to block<br />

many resolutions presented by the Radicals.<br />

In addition, methods used by the Moderates to<br />

silence a leading Radical attempting to introduce a<br />

resolution led to violent clashes in the congress itself, and<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!