26.12.2014 Views

The Investigation of Volkswagen's Entry Strategy in China's Car Market

The Investigation of Volkswagen's Entry Strategy in China's Car Market

The Investigation of Volkswagen's Entry Strategy in China's Car Market

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MA MANAGEMENT DISSERTATION<br />

XIAOFENG WEN<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is slow to establish a Greenfield venture, there is the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

be<strong>in</strong>g preempted by aggressive competitors who enter the same market via<br />

acquisition.<br />

2). Acquisition<br />

Advantages<br />

Acquisitions are quick to execute. Unlike Greenfield venture, acquisitions save the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g the subsidiary; therefore a firm can quickly build its presence <strong>in</strong> the<br />

target market. For example, Daimler-Benz rapidly showed its presence <strong>in</strong> the US<br />

market by acquir<strong>in</strong>g and merg<strong>in</strong>g a few big US automobile companies (Wild 2006).<br />

Second, it is easy to preempt the competitors because it is quick; many firms make<br />

acquisitions for this purpose. This is particularly effective <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustries that are<br />

rapidly globaliz<strong>in</strong>g, such as the telecommunication market. It is possible that<br />

acquisitions are less risky than Greenfield ventures, as firms buy assets that are<br />

already mak<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>its, so less uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, and also, except for the tangible assets,<br />

firms also buy <strong>in</strong>tangible assets such as local brand name and experienced managers,<br />

these all reduce the risk.<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Firstly, acquired firms are <strong>of</strong>ten overpaid, especially when more than one firm is<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> it, and top managers tend to overestimate their ability to create value<br />

from an acquisition.<br />

Secondly, culture clash is another important reason for the fails <strong>of</strong> acquisitions.<br />

Culture difference between the established firm and acquired subsidiary cause high<br />

management turnover, which harms the performance <strong>of</strong> the acquired firm, especially<br />

when the managers have valuable local knowledge. For example, <strong>in</strong> the first year<br />

after Daimler acquired Chrysler, many senior managers left because <strong>of</strong> culture clash<br />

(Hill, 2005).<br />

- 25 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!