30.12.2014 Views

3ytgeaf

3ytgeaf

3ytgeaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Engaging for success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement<br />

9 It is of course not that simple. There is no one agreed definition of employee<br />

engagement – during the course of this review we have come across more than 50<br />

definitions; three of them are quoted below.<br />

“Engagement is about creating opportunities for employees to connect with their<br />

colleagues, managers and wider organisation. It is also about creating an<br />

environment where employees are motivated to want to connect with their work<br />

and really care about doing a good job…It is a concept that places flexibility,<br />

change and continuous improvement at the heart of what it means to be an<br />

employee and an employer in a twenty-first century workplace.” (Professor Katie<br />

Truss 1 )<br />

“A positive attitude held by the employee towards the organisation and its values.<br />

An engaged employee is aware of the business context, and works with<br />

colleagues to improve performance within the job for the benefit of the<br />

organisation. The organisation must work to develop and nurture engagement,<br />

which requires a two-way relationship between employee and employer.”<br />

(Institute of Employment Studies 2 )<br />

“A set of positive attitudes and behaviours enabling high job performance of a<br />

kind which are in tune with the organisation’s mission.” (Professor John Storey 3 )<br />

10 Early on in the review, when we spoke to David Guest, Professor of Organisational<br />

Psychology and Human Resource Management at Kings College London, he pointed<br />

out that much of the discussion of engagement tends to get muddled as to whether<br />

it is an attitude, a behaviour or an outcome or, indeed, all three. He went on to<br />

suggest that “… the concept of employee engagement needs to be more clearly<br />

defined […] or it needs to be abandoned”. 4 We have decided, however, that there is<br />

too much momentum and indeed excellent work being done under the banner of<br />

employee engagement to abandon the term.<br />

Not everyone who practices engagement uses the term: Liz Sands, Buyouts<br />

Director at 3i Private Equity, told us 3i probably doesn’t use the term<br />

‘employee engagement’ at Board level but “it is fundamental to driving<br />

improved performance in the business and the organisation as a whole is signed<br />

up to it for that reason”.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E. and Truss, C (2009) Employee engagement in context. London: Chartered<br />

Institute of Personnel and Development<br />

Robinson, D., Perryman S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement. IES Report 408<br />

John Storey, Patrick M Wright, David Ulrich eds. (2008). The Routledge Companion to Strategic Human<br />

Resource Management.<br />

David Guest, ‘Review of Employee Engagement: Notes for a Discussion, December 2008’ unpublished paper<br />

prepared specifically for the MacLeod Review<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!