02.01.2015 Views

ISSUE 34 : May/Jun - 1982 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 34 : May/Jun - 1982 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 34 : May/Jun - 1982 - Australian Defence Force Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUSTRALIA'S ARMY RESERVES: 1788-1854 55<br />

Colbum's appeared to be whistling in the<br />

dark. While expressing approbation for Louis'<br />

bold stroke, it felt that it would be criminal to<br />

overlook the assistance he had received from<br />

the French Army, even though there were<br />

reports of a strength reduction obviously aimed<br />

at disarming apprehension. There was an<br />

unwillingness to suppose<br />

that a ruler of Louis Napoleon's indisputable<br />

tact would advisedly attempt a hostile<br />

descent on our shores, as common rumour<br />

now considers probable; for the enterprise,<br />

however successful for the moment, would<br />

infallibly terminate in his own destruction.^<br />

The castle was surrounded by a moat which<br />

could be bridged by steam or fog; the Militia,<br />

under existing Acts, would take at least nineteen<br />

weeks before it was actually embodied;<br />

the real answer was to strengthen the Army,<br />

particularly the artillery.<br />

Most observers believed that without Palmerston<br />

it was only a matter of time before<br />

the Ministry would fall. In February 1852,<br />

Russell, described by Sydney Smith as having<br />

so sublime a conceit that he would cheerfully<br />

have undetaken to command the Channel Fleet<br />

as to perform an operation for the stone,<br />

introduced a new Bill for strengthening the<br />

Militia.-"<br />

Fear of the French in 1845 had roused<br />

interest in the Militia, which was then in a sad<br />

way. The ballot had been discontinued fourteen<br />

years before, and over the following years the<br />

Staff dispersed. While the population had<br />

almost doubled, the existing Act only authorised<br />

42,000 men to be enrolled, but before<br />

training could commence all 'eligible' men<br />

would have to be enrolled and the ballot<br />

drawn. Before Peel could take action, however,<br />

he was out of office. Fox-Maule presented a<br />

Bill in 1848, but nothing eventuated — the<br />

crisis had passed, and in any event the Russell<br />

Administration did not appear to be able to<br />

make up its mind on the shape of the force.<br />

Russell's Bill was simple. The new force<br />

would be a local Militia, which would only be<br />

called out in time of invasion. Those aged<br />

twenty would be enrolled, of whom one-fifth<br />

would be ballotted-in, thereby avoiding disrupting<br />

the lives of older men, but at the same<br />

time avoiding the expense of supporting their<br />

wives and children. Substitutes could be hired<br />

from those ballotted-out.<br />

Asserting that this action was not being<br />

taken under pressure of panic, and that the<br />

measure four years earlier had only been<br />

defeated because it had been tied to increased<br />

tax proposals, Russell also proposed to increase<br />

the regular forces by 4,000 infantry and 1,000<br />

artillery — an action described by Colburn's<br />

as 'having proclaimed our nakedness to<br />

Europe, [we] now take refuge in a fig leaf.<br />

Palmerston now had his 'tit for tat with John<br />

Russell'. Attacking the Militia proposals he<br />

concentrated on the key issue of whether it<br />

would be 'local' or 'general'; whether it should<br />

be raised by ballot in local areas, or by bounty<br />

throughout England; available only within the<br />

limits of the several counties in which it was<br />

raised, or a garde mobile which could be sent<br />

anywhere in England where its services were<br />

required. On this latter point Russel intimated<br />

that the force should be applicable to the<br />

whole Kingdom, whereupon Palmerston stated<br />

the Bill was antagonistic to its title, and<br />

proposed an amendment. The Government was<br />

defeated, and the Earl of Derby, who had<br />

succeeded to the leadership of the Conservatives<br />

on the death of Robert Peel (the younger),<br />

came to power with Sir John Pakington as<br />

Secretary for War and the Colonies, and<br />

William Beresford as Secretary at War. 44<br />

Colburn's was not surprised — the 'idea of<br />

a local militia, as an available defensive force<br />

in case of invasion, was worthy of the impotent<br />

brain of a worn-out family Minister. It was<br />

the abortive device of a feeble and distempered<br />

mind strained to the utmost in its effort to<br />

meet the emergency, and utterly unequal to the<br />

task'. At the same time it took Grey, the<br />

retiring Colonial Secretary, somewhat intemperately<br />

to task for recalling Sir Harry Smith<br />

from the Cape — 'this wretched abortion of<br />

a SECRETARY, this miserable Whig imposter,<br />

this zany of an imbecile, leprous and degraded<br />

Cabinet'. Fortesque, just as conservative in his<br />

outlook, was kinder when dealing with the<br />

same event. Grey 'appears, in fact, to have<br />

been a man with no powers of imagination.<br />

To say that he was ignorant of the barest<br />

elements of war is only to say that he was an<br />

English Minister of the middle of the nineteenth<br />

century'. 4 '<br />

The Illustrated London News considered<br />

that Russell had been lucky to have been<br />

turned out of office over the Militia Bill, since<br />

there were other possibilties — the Budget,<br />

Electoral Reform and the most damaging of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!