Use of oxytocin and misoprostol for induction or ... - POPPHI
Use of oxytocin and misoprostol for induction or ... - POPPHI
Use of oxytocin and misoprostol for induction or ... - POPPHI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
treatment <strong>and</strong> was not statistically significant (0.64-1.26)(109). However, given that<br />
mechanical methods do not bring about immediate onset <strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong>, one could argue that<br />
vaginal delivery within 24 hours may not be the most appropriate outcome indicat<strong>or</strong>. Six<br />
studies found no significant differences in the risk <strong>of</strong> Cesarean (relative risk: 1.00; 0.76-<br />
1.30). No cases <strong>of</strong> severe neonatal <strong>or</strong> maternal m<strong>or</strong>bidity were rep<strong>or</strong>ted.<br />
Mechanical methods compared against three different prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins showed either<br />
increased risks <strong>of</strong> vaginal delivery not within 24 hours <strong>or</strong> no significant difference in risk;<br />
no significant differences in the risk <strong>of</strong> Cesarean; <strong>and</strong> substantially decreased risks <strong>of</strong><br />
hyper-stimulation <strong>of</strong> the uterus with fetal heart changes (<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> example: the relative risk <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />
mechanical methods compared against PGE 2 was 0.14 (0.04-0.53); against intracervical<br />
PGE 2: 0.21 (0.04-1.20);<strong>and</strong> against misprostol: 0.41 (0.20-0.87). Vaginal delivery not<br />
within 24 hours <strong>and</strong> hyper-stimulation <strong>of</strong> the uterus with fetal heart changes were not<br />
assessed <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> mechanical methods compared against <strong>oxytocin</strong>. Mechanical methods were<br />
shown to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> Cesarean section relative to <strong>oxytocin</strong> (relative risk: 0.55;<br />
0.33-0.91). <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> extra-amniotic infusion was not found to be beneficial <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> any <strong>of</strong> the<br />
outcomes studied. The auth<strong>or</strong> concludes that evidence is insufficient to determine the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> mechanical methods <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours but<br />
that the risk to mother <strong>and</strong> baby is low. They recommend larger studies which assess a<br />
broader set <strong>of</strong> outcomes, including maternal satisfaction <strong>and</strong> economic outcomes.<br />
Sweeping <strong>of</strong> the membranes was examined in a 2005 Cochrane review by Boulvain as<br />
well (108). Sweeping <strong>of</strong> the membranes, also commonly referred to as stripping <strong>of</strong> the<br />
membranes, is done to decrease the duration <strong>of</strong> pregnancy <strong>or</strong> to avoid <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mal <strong>induction</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
lab<strong>or</strong> with <strong>oxytocin</strong>, prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins <strong>or</strong> ARM. Sweeping <strong>of</strong> the membranes is a simple<br />
technique that can be done on an out-patient basis. It involves inserting the examiner’s<br />
finger into the cervical os during a vaginal exam <strong>and</strong> detaching the membranes from the<br />
lower segment <strong>of</strong> the uterus with a circular movement <strong>of</strong> the finger. This separation <strong>of</strong><br />
tissues results in the production <strong>of</strong> natural prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins which may lead to cervical<br />
ripening <strong>or</strong> the initiation <strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong>. The cervix may also be massaged to encourage<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tening during the procedure.<br />
47