Use of oxytocin and misoprostol for induction or ... - POPPHI
Use of oxytocin and misoprostol for induction or ... - POPPHI
Use of oxytocin and misoprostol for induction or ... - POPPHI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
81. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Douglas I, Tracy SK, Peat B. Trends in labour <strong>and</strong> birth<br />
interventions among low-risk women in new south wales. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.<br />
2002 May;42(2):176-81.<br />
82. Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, F<strong>or</strong>tier M, Fraser W. Risks <strong>of</strong> <strong>induction</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001<br />
Apr;15(2):131-8.<br />
83. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy J-. Outcome after elective lab<strong>or</strong> <strong>induction</strong><br />
in nulliparous women: A matched coh<strong>or</strong>t study. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Obstetrics <strong>and</strong><br />
Gynecology. 2002 [cited 27 February 2008];186(2):240-4.<br />
84. Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, Lyell DJ, Washington AE. Induction <strong>of</strong><br />
lab<strong>or</strong> <strong>and</strong> cesarean delivery by gestational age. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Obstetrics <strong>and</strong><br />
Gynecology,. 2006 9;195(3):700-5.<br />
85. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction <strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong> <strong>and</strong> the relationship to cesarean<br />
delivery: A review <strong>of</strong> 7001 consecutive <strong>induction</strong>s. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999<br />
Mar;180(3 Pt 1):628-33.<br />
86. Simpson KR, Atterbury J. Trends <strong>and</strong> issues in lab<strong>or</strong> <strong>induction</strong> in the united states:<br />
Implications <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> clinical practice. JOGNN. 2003 11;32(6):767-79.<br />
87. Heinberg EM, Wood RA, Chambers RB. Elective <strong>induction</strong> <strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong> in multiparous<br />
women. does it increase the risk <strong>of</strong> cesarean section J Reprod Med. 2002<br />
May;47(5):399-403.<br />
88. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective <strong>induction</strong> <strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong> as a risk fact<strong>or</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> cesarean<br />
delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstetrics <strong>and</strong> Gynecology. 2000 [cited 15<br />
December 2007];95(6 I):917-22.<br />
89. Sheiner E, Levy A, Feinstein U, Hallak M, Maz<strong>or</strong> M. Risk fact<strong>or</strong>s <strong>and</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong><br />
failure to progress during the first stage <strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong>: A population-based study. Acta Obstet<br />
Gynecol Sc<strong>and</strong>. 2002 Mar;81(3):222-6.<br />
90. Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk <strong>of</strong> cesarean delivery after <strong>induction</strong> at term<br />
in nulliparous women with an unfav<strong>or</strong>able cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003<br />
Jun;188(6):1565,9; discussion 1569-72.<br />
91. Crane JMG, Young DC. Induction <strong>of</strong> labour with a favourable cervix <strong>and</strong>/<strong>or</strong> prelabour<br />
rupture <strong>of</strong> membranes. Bailliere's Best Practice <strong>and</strong> Research in Clinical<br />
Obstetrics <strong>and</strong> Gynaecology. 2003 [cited 16 October 2007];17(5):795-809.<br />
92. Amano K, Saito K, Shoda T, Tani A, Yoshihara H, Nishijima M. Effective <strong>induction</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> lab<strong>or</strong> at 39 weeks <strong>of</strong> gestation: A prospective r<strong>and</strong>omized trial. Journal <strong>of</strong> Obstetrics<br />
<strong>and</strong> Gynaecology Research. 1999 [cited 27 February 2008];25(1):33-7.<br />
70
Change language