Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 28 FEBRUARY 2012<br />
Response<br />
This matter will be discussed at tonight's meeting.<br />
Question 2<br />
When preparing its next budget, would the <strong>Town</strong> consider reducing expenditure in other<br />
areas and direct those funds to providing community safety patrols within the <strong>Town</strong><br />
should community consultation show that residents wanted patrols and were prepared to<br />
forgo other services in order to get them<br />
Response<br />
This matter will be discussed at tonight's meeting.<br />
Question 3<br />
The report recommends that the <strong>Town</strong> acts as an advocate for the community by<br />
lobbying the State Government for more police <strong>of</strong>ficers. Specifically, which <strong>of</strong>ficers will<br />
be doing it and when and how will they do it<br />
Response<br />
This matter will be discussed at tonight's meeting, however, the Director Community<br />
Development suggested that it would be the <strong>Council</strong> who would lobby the State<br />
Government.<br />
Question 4<br />
How can the graffiti removal service be referred to as successful when graffiti has not<br />
been removed at City Beach Pre Primary School even though it was reported in the<br />
Western Suburbs Weekly two months ago<br />
Response<br />
The Chief Executive Officer advised that unfortunately that incident had not been<br />
reported to the <strong>Town</strong> and we did not pick it up from the newspaper article. The <strong>Town</strong> has<br />
a good record <strong>of</strong> removing graffiti when it is reported.<br />
Kevin Gammage, 85 Branksome Gardens, City Beach<br />
Re: Works undertaken at 81 Branksome Avenue, City Beach<br />
Question 1<br />
Was approval sought for the fill undertaken in 2006<br />
Response<br />
The Director Development advised that it had been investigated and it was concluded<br />
that no approval was required.<br />
Question 2<br />
On what level will future applications for building on this lot be based<br />
H:\Ceo\Gov\<strong>Council</strong> <strong>Minutes</strong>\12 MINUTES\February 2012\A <strong>Council</strong> Front.docx 7