12.01.2015 Views

Journal of Reliable Power - SEL

Journal of Reliable Power - SEL

Journal of Reliable Power - SEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

15<br />

B. Adaptive Resistance Element<br />

Fig. 29 shows the quadrilateral distance element<br />

characteristic that uses the adaptive reactance element <strong>of</strong> the<br />

previous design with an adaptive resistive element.<br />

X<br />

Adaptive Reactance Element<br />

setting <strong>of</strong> 11.52 ohms and an impedance reach (Zset) setting <strong>of</strong><br />

120 percent <strong>of</strong> ZL1. The mho distance element has a reach <strong>of</strong><br />

120 percent <strong>of</strong> ZL1. The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> all the distance<br />

elements is 0.05 • Inom.<br />

Fig. 30, Fig. 31, and Fig. 32 show the Rf coverage <strong>of</strong> mho<br />

and quadrilateral distance elements. We observe that the Rf<br />

coverage is severely reduced as the fault approaches the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the line. As expected, the mho element is the one with less Rf<br />

coverage, and the adaptive resistance element has the greatest<br />

Rf coverage, especially for power flow in the forward<br />

direction, δ equal to 10 degrees.<br />

20<br />

18<br />

Mho Distance Element<br />

Quadrilateral Distance Element<br />

Adaptive Resistive Element<br />

Z LINE<br />

Adaptive<br />

Resistive<br />

Element<br />

16<br />

14<br />

Rset = 11.52 ohms<br />

δ = -10 degrees<br />

R<br />

Fault Resistance (ohms)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

Fig. 29. Quadrilateral distance element characteristic with adaptive<br />

resistance element<br />

The adaptive resistive element calculates Rf according to<br />

(38) and (39), and compares the minimum <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

calculation results against the resistive setting.<br />

j⋅θ<br />

L1<br />

( )<br />

j⋅θ<br />

L1<br />

*<br />

( )<br />

Im<br />

⎡<br />

V • I2 • e<br />

⎢<br />

R2 =<br />

⎣<br />

Im<br />

⎡<br />

I • I2 • e<br />

⎢⎣<br />

Im<br />

⎡<br />

V • I<br />

⎢<br />

Rα<br />

=<br />

⎣<br />

Im<br />

⎡<br />

I • I<br />

⎢⎣<br />

⎤<br />

⎥⎦<br />

⎤<br />

⎥⎦<br />

*<br />

j⋅θ<br />

L1<br />

( α • e )<br />

j⋅θ<br />

L1<br />

*<br />

( α • e )<br />

⎤<br />

⎥⎦<br />

⎤<br />

⎥⎦<br />

*<br />

(38)<br />

(39)<br />

Equation (38) is equivalent to (11) and (12). It uses a<br />

different form <strong>of</strong> phase comparator equation. Equation (39)<br />

uses the alpha component (Iα = I1 + I2).<br />

C. Resistive Coverage<br />

To compare the resistive coverage <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />

distance elements with the adaptive resistive element, we use<br />

the system in Fig. 4 and perform the tests discussed in the<br />

following sections.<br />

1) Faults at Multiple Locations<br />

We calculate the maximum Rf that the distance elements<br />

can detect for an A-phase-to-ground fault for m values from 0<br />

to 1 and load angles <strong>of</strong> δ equal to –10, 0, and 10 degrees. The<br />

quadrilateral distance elements have a resistive reach (Rset)<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />

Fault Location (pu)<br />

Fig. 30. Rf coverage <strong>of</strong> mho and quadrilateral distance elements for<br />

δ equal to –10 degrees<br />

Fault Resistance (ohms)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Mho Distance Element<br />

Quadrilateral Distance Element<br />

Adaptive Resistive Element<br />

Rset = 11.52 ohms<br />

δ = 0 degrees<br />

0<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />

Fault Location (pu)<br />

Fig. 31. Rf coverage <strong>of</strong> mho and quadrilateral distance elements for δ equal<br />

to 0 degrees<br />

Adaptive Phase and Ground Quadrilateral Distance Elements | 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!