12.01.2015 Views

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Introduction:<br />

Corporate entities are viewed as vehicles of value maximization<br />

for investors. Yet, they are also means of achieving<br />

diverse goals of different stakeholders. Viewed from this<br />

perspective, the objectives of mergers and acquisitions<br />

have been examined and studied as tools of achieving a<br />

number of different yet related objectives. Baumol (1967)<br />

and Mueller (1969) found merger and acquisition activity<br />

as a means of empire building. Shleifer and Vishny (1989)<br />

observed it to be a means of management entrenchment.<br />

Likewise mergers have been resorted to for enhancing<br />

monopoly power (Mueller, 1993); to improve the performance<br />

of an entity/target perceived to be underperforming<br />

(Roll, 1986). However, from the stand point<br />

of a world view that resources are limited and only the<br />

fittest can survive, the appropriate paradigm explaining<br />

merger and acquisition activity will be Efficiency <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

of Firms. <strong>The</strong> theory states that only efficient firms will<br />

survive and inefficient firms will be taken over (Manne,<br />

1965; Mead, 1968; Jensen, 1988).<strong>The</strong> issue has assumed<br />

great significance in emerging economies in view of rising<br />

trend in them towards M & A.<br />

<strong>The</strong>oretical and empirical research on motivations<br />

for mergers and acquisitions has identified a number of<br />

factors such as reduction in costs (Coase, 1937), elimination<br />

of hold up problems (Williamson, 1979), mitigation<br />

of uncertainties in market transactions (Klein,<br />

Crawford and Alchian, 1979), risk aversion (Blair and<br />

Kaserman, 1978) and meeting the challenges posed<br />

by price inflexibility (Carlton, 1979) and competition<br />

(Perry, 1989). <strong>The</strong>se factors collectively constitute the<br />

effort to overcome internal management hurdles and to<br />

improve the efficiency. Studies on managerial performance<br />

have revealed that often poor performance is the<br />

consequence of managers deviating their focus from<br />

long term value maximization and profitability (Rappaport,2002<br />

). Deflection of the focus leads to decline<br />

in the operating efficiency leading to poor performance<br />

and non realization of the potential. Poor performance<br />

in the presence of good resources and potential attracts<br />

buyers/investors who believe that operating efficiency<br />

and value can be increased if methods and techniques<br />

of utilization of resources are improved. <strong>The</strong> acquiring<br />

firms are propelled to buy the target with the objective of<br />

transforming the operational landscape and practices to<br />

bring about improved efficiency, by Mr. Jangoo input-output Dalalratios and<br />

hence value. Another most Sr. VP-Enterprise, commonly cited Cisco managerial Systems (India & SAARC)<br />

motivation for undertaking M&A is unlocking synergies<br />

(Walter and Barney, 1990). Unlocking synergies means<br />

creation of economic gains when assets are used more<br />

effectively by the combined entity than by the target<br />

and acquirer separately (Shelton, 1988). This occurs pri-<br />

July-October - 2007 Need the Dough<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!