india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Introduction:<br />
Corporate entities are viewed as vehicles of value maximization<br />
for investors. Yet, they are also means of achieving<br />
diverse goals of different stakeholders. Viewed from this<br />
perspective, the objectives of mergers and acquisitions<br />
have been examined and studied as tools of achieving a<br />
number of different yet related objectives. Baumol (1967)<br />
and Mueller (1969) found merger and acquisition activity<br />
as a means of empire building. Shleifer and Vishny (1989)<br />
observed it to be a means of management entrenchment.<br />
Likewise mergers have been resorted to for enhancing<br />
monopoly power (Mueller, 1993); to improve the performance<br />
of an entity/target perceived to be underperforming<br />
(Roll, 1986). However, from the stand point<br />
of a world view that resources are limited and only the<br />
fittest can survive, the appropriate paradigm explaining<br />
merger and acquisition activity will be Efficiency <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
of Firms. <strong>The</strong> theory states that only efficient firms will<br />
survive and inefficient firms will be taken over (Manne,<br />
1965; Mead, 1968; Jensen, 1988).<strong>The</strong> issue has assumed<br />
great significance in emerging economies in view of rising<br />
trend in them towards M & A.<br />
<strong>The</strong>oretical and empirical research on motivations<br />
for mergers and acquisitions has identified a number of<br />
factors such as reduction in costs (Coase, 1937), elimination<br />
of hold up problems (Williamson, 1979), mitigation<br />
of uncertainties in market transactions (Klein,<br />
Crawford and Alchian, 1979), risk aversion (Blair and<br />
Kaserman, 1978) and meeting the challenges posed<br />
by price inflexibility (Carlton, 1979) and competition<br />
(Perry, 1989). <strong>The</strong>se factors collectively constitute the<br />
effort to overcome internal management hurdles and to<br />
improve the efficiency. Studies on managerial performance<br />
have revealed that often poor performance is the<br />
consequence of managers deviating their focus from<br />
long term value maximization and profitability (Rappaport,2002<br />
). Deflection of the focus leads to decline<br />
in the operating efficiency leading to poor performance<br />
and non realization of the potential. Poor performance<br />
in the presence of good resources and potential attracts<br />
buyers/investors who believe that operating efficiency<br />
and value can be increased if methods and techniques<br />
of utilization of resources are improved. <strong>The</strong> acquiring<br />
firms are propelled to buy the target with the objective of<br />
transforming the operational landscape and practices to<br />
bring about improved efficiency, by Mr. Jangoo input-output Dalalratios and<br />
hence value. Another most Sr. VP-Enterprise, commonly cited Cisco managerial Systems (India & SAARC)<br />
motivation for undertaking M&A is unlocking synergies<br />
(Walter and Barney, 1990). Unlocking synergies means<br />
creation of economic gains when assets are used more<br />
effectively by the combined entity than by the target<br />
and acquirer separately (Shelton, 1988). This occurs pri-<br />
July-October - 2007 Need the Dough<br />
53