12.01.2015 Views

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS<br />

capital and labour on the other is relatively small indicating<br />

some degree of complementarity. Table-6 provides<br />

the estimates of own and cross price elasticities.<br />

Table 7 summarises the estimates of own and cross<br />

price elasticities of conditional input demands. All price<br />

Table 5<br />

Test of Restrictions Using Pindyck’s Coefficient<br />

Degrees of<br />

Freedom<br />

Total<br />

Sample<br />

elasticities are negative, with all input demands except for<br />

profit being highly price elastic. <strong>The</strong> cross price elasticities<br />

contain much of the same information contained<br />

in the elasticities of substitution and indicate substitutability<br />

among all inputs. Increases in cost of materials<br />

induce increased profit but very slight response in labour<br />

and capital utilization. Profit use also responds relatively<br />

highly for increases in wages and capital costs. Increases<br />

in capital costs cause a modest increase in labour use.<br />

Overall, Tables 5 and 6 provide additional assurance that<br />

our representation of the technology is reasonable and<br />

methodology adopted in this study is appropriate.<br />

Economies of scale and technological innovations:<br />

Finally, let us examine the results relating to economies<br />

of scale as well as technological change as a result of M<br />

& A. Table 8 presents the results relating to returns to<br />

scale measuring responsiveness of cost due to change in<br />

output after merger holding input prices constant. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

estimates of scale elasticities are measured as per equation<br />

(12). In respect of the total sample it can be seen that the<br />

coefficient of scale elasticity is 1.29. <strong>The</strong> coefficient is<br />

India Brazil Malaysia Chi Sq<br />

at.001<br />

Homotheticity 4 2.15 4.12 3.11 9.23 18.47<br />

Homogeneity 5 3.11 6.35 6.44 11.23 20.52<br />

Cobb-Douglous 12 12.054 22.36 9.25 25.36 36.12<br />

Table 6<br />

Allen Elasticitiess<br />

Materials Labour Capital Profit<br />

Materials -0.36244<br />

(-3.09333)<br />

Labour 0.03251 -1.0354<br />

(-4.01214) (-6.98)<br />

Capital 0.05761 1.1423 -2.3959<br />

(-4.00946) (-15.32) (-4.702)<br />

Profit 1.0258 1.24.331 1.0549 -9.475<br />

(-4.823) (-11.104) (-7.25) (-14.24)<br />

Figures in parentheses are t values<br />

greater than 1. It implies that an equi-proportional rise<br />

in all the inputs is leading to more than proportional<br />

increase in output. Thus the sample data of the present<br />

study shows that M & A activity results in economies of<br />

scale. Table 8 also shows that coefficient of scale elasticity<br />

is greater than<br />

1 in respect of individual<br />

countries also.<br />

Thus the merged firms<br />

tend to operate on declining<br />

portion of the<br />

average cost function<br />

when costs are plotted<br />

against output. One<br />

can examine how scale<br />

economies change over a period of time. In the context of<br />

M & A, we are interested in knowing whether the output<br />

level at which minimum average cost can be achieved<br />

increases overtime. That is to say, we need to examine<br />

whether M & A activity leads to rise in the range of output<br />

over which average cost can be reduced further due<br />

to economies of scale. To investigate the occurrence of<br />

economies of scale over time, we can define economies<br />

Table 7<br />

Direct Elasticities<br />

Materials Labour Capital Profit<br />

Materials -0.2185 0.02746 0.0025 1.15725<br />

(-3.15) -3.26 -3.21 -5.68<br />

Lobour 0.0658 -0.45879 0.1958 0.3154<br />

(4.25) (-9.254) -5.26 -7.36<br />

Capital 4.69 0.3154 -0.5891 0.1654<br />

(12.825) (6.25) (8.256) (5.25)<br />

Profit 1.1153 0.5421 0.2014 -1.123<br />

(8.25) (7.256) (7.23) (14.25)<br />

Figures in parantheses are t values<br />

or diseconomies of scale in terms of cost elasticity. If<br />

cost elasticity is greater than 1, it implies existence of<br />

scale economies. If it is less than 1 it implies existence<br />

of diseconomies of scale.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first derivative of cost elasticity (defined as reciprocal<br />

of scale elasticity) with respect to time T (βC/βT) is<br />

given by βQt in equation 8. A βQt less than zero indicate<br />

that the percentage increase in cost due to 1% increase<br />

in output falls over time. This suggests an increase in<br />

the degree of scale economies over time. In other words<br />

a βQt less than zero will indicate that the output level<br />

at which the long run cost is at minimum has increased<br />

over time. That is the size of the firm at which all the<br />

July-October - 2007 Need the Dough<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!