india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS<br />
capital and labour on the other is relatively small indicating<br />
some degree of complementarity. Table-6 provides<br />
the estimates of own and cross price elasticities.<br />
Table 7 summarises the estimates of own and cross<br />
price elasticities of conditional input demands. All price<br />
Table 5<br />
Test of Restrictions Using Pindyck’s Coefficient<br />
Degrees of<br />
Freedom<br />
Total<br />
Sample<br />
elasticities are negative, with all input demands except for<br />
profit being highly price elastic. <strong>The</strong> cross price elasticities<br />
contain much of the same information contained<br />
in the elasticities of substitution and indicate substitutability<br />
among all inputs. Increases in cost of materials<br />
induce increased profit but very slight response in labour<br />
and capital utilization. Profit use also responds relatively<br />
highly for increases in wages and capital costs. Increases<br />
in capital costs cause a modest increase in labour use.<br />
Overall, Tables 5 and 6 provide additional assurance that<br />
our representation of the technology is reasonable and<br />
methodology adopted in this study is appropriate.<br />
Economies of scale and technological innovations:<br />
Finally, let us examine the results relating to economies<br />
of scale as well as technological change as a result of M<br />
& A. Table 8 presents the results relating to returns to<br />
scale measuring responsiveness of cost due to change in<br />
output after merger holding input prices constant. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
estimates of scale elasticities are measured as per equation<br />
(12). In respect of the total sample it can be seen that the<br />
coefficient of scale elasticity is 1.29. <strong>The</strong> coefficient is<br />
India Brazil Malaysia Chi Sq<br />
at.001<br />
Homotheticity 4 2.15 4.12 3.11 9.23 18.47<br />
Homogeneity 5 3.11 6.35 6.44 11.23 20.52<br />
Cobb-Douglous 12 12.054 22.36 9.25 25.36 36.12<br />
Table 6<br />
Allen Elasticitiess<br />
Materials Labour Capital Profit<br />
Materials -0.36244<br />
(-3.09333)<br />
Labour 0.03251 -1.0354<br />
(-4.01214) (-6.98)<br />
Capital 0.05761 1.1423 -2.3959<br />
(-4.00946) (-15.32) (-4.702)<br />
Profit 1.0258 1.24.331 1.0549 -9.475<br />
(-4.823) (-11.104) (-7.25) (-14.24)<br />
Figures in parentheses are t values<br />
greater than 1. It implies that an equi-proportional rise<br />
in all the inputs is leading to more than proportional<br />
increase in output. Thus the sample data of the present<br />
study shows that M & A activity results in economies of<br />
scale. Table 8 also shows that coefficient of scale elasticity<br />
is greater than<br />
1 in respect of individual<br />
countries also.<br />
Thus the merged firms<br />
tend to operate on declining<br />
portion of the<br />
average cost function<br />
when costs are plotted<br />
against output. One<br />
can examine how scale<br />
economies change over a period of time. In the context of<br />
M & A, we are interested in knowing whether the output<br />
level at which minimum average cost can be achieved<br />
increases overtime. That is to say, we need to examine<br />
whether M & A activity leads to rise in the range of output<br />
over which average cost can be reduced further due<br />
to economies of scale. To investigate the occurrence of<br />
economies of scale over time, we can define economies<br />
Table 7<br />
Direct Elasticities<br />
Materials Labour Capital Profit<br />
Materials -0.2185 0.02746 0.0025 1.15725<br />
(-3.15) -3.26 -3.21 -5.68<br />
Lobour 0.0658 -0.45879 0.1958 0.3154<br />
(4.25) (-9.254) -5.26 -7.36<br />
Capital 4.69 0.3154 -0.5891 0.1654<br />
(12.825) (6.25) (8.256) (5.25)<br />
Profit 1.1153 0.5421 0.2014 -1.123<br />
(8.25) (7.256) (7.23) (14.25)<br />
Figures in parantheses are t values<br />
or diseconomies of scale in terms of cost elasticity. If<br />
cost elasticity is greater than 1, it implies existence of<br />
scale economies. If it is less than 1 it implies existence<br />
of diseconomies of scale.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first derivative of cost elasticity (defined as reciprocal<br />
of scale elasticity) with respect to time T (βC/βT) is<br />
given by βQt in equation 8. A βQt less than zero indicate<br />
that the percentage increase in cost due to 1% increase<br />
in output falls over time. This suggests an increase in<br />
the degree of scale economies over time. In other words<br />
a βQt less than zero will indicate that the output level<br />
at which the long run cost is at minimum has increased<br />
over time. That is the size of the firm at which all the<br />
July-October - 2007 Need the Dough<br />
61