india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RESEARCH<br />
βQ = 0. (12)<br />
Finally, a Cobb-Douglas specification implies, in addition<br />
to (5), (6) and (7), the following restriction:<br />
βij = βiQ = 0. (13)<br />
Pindyck (1976) states that we can test restrictions using<br />
a simple chi-square test <strong>The</strong> appropriate test statistic<br />
is :<br />
-2 log C = n (log Ω* r - log Ω* u) (14)<br />
where, IΩ*rI and IΩ*uI are the determinants of the<br />
estimated error covariance<br />
matrices for the restricted and unrestricted models respectively.<br />
This statistic is distributed as chi-square with<br />
degrees of freedom equal to the number of parameter<br />
restrictions being tested.<br />
To characterize the nature of the production process<br />
further as represented by the cost functions, the study<br />
also estimates the Allen elasticities of substitution and<br />
elasticities of conditional input demands. From the cost<br />
and share equations, the measures of the Allen elasticities<br />
of substitutions are defined as:<br />
σij = βij/Si*Sj - 1/Si + 1 , for i = j, (15a)<br />
Where Si = cost share of input i<br />
σij = βij/Si*Sj + 1 for i ≠ j (15 b)<br />
<strong>The</strong> related own- and cross-partial elasticities of conditional<br />
input demand are given by:<br />
εij = βij/Si + Si - 1 , for i = j, and (16 a)<br />
εij = βij/Si + Sj , for i ≠ j. (16 b)<br />
Estimation of Economies of Scale:<br />
Economies of scale are said to exist if an increase in<br />
output, holding input prices constant, leads to a less than<br />
proportional increase in total costs, causing a decline<br />
in average costs. When two firms merge the size of the<br />
firm rises proportionally. If internal management of the<br />
combined firms improves and\or the synergies unlock,<br />
these will manifest in scale of economies in the same<br />
way as defined here. From the translog cost function<br />
stated in equation (3) above, returns to scale measuring<br />
cost responses resulting from changes in output, post<br />
merger holding input prices constant, can be derived<br />
as follows:<br />
firm result in a more than proportional increase in output.<br />
Evidence of scale economies, other things constant,<br />
could be a rationale for M & A activity.<br />
Investigation of synergy and technological Change<br />
It is well known fact in economics that a change in<br />
output holding the quantity and cost of inputs constant<br />
can occur if there is a change in technology. This concept<br />
has been employed in the present study in the context of<br />
evaluation of M&A. unlocking of synergies and improvement<br />
in internal management practices will be manifest<br />
in the significant technology coefficient of the cost function<br />
specified in the equation (3) above. Specifically, from<br />
the cost side, holding input prices constant, technological<br />
change permits the firm to produce the same level of<br />
output at lower expenditure. Given the cost function in<br />
(3), the rate of technological change can be measured<br />
by:<br />
Where<br />
= rate of technological change<br />
(18)<br />
Technological change can be biased with respect to inputs<br />
as well as with respect to the scale characteristics of<br />
the production technology. With regard to input biases,<br />
a technological change is Hicks-neutral, if the slope of<br />
the production isoquants is independent of technological<br />
change. A cost-neutral technological change, an analogous<br />
(but not equivalent) concept, refers to a technical<br />
change that does not affect relative cost shares of inputs.<br />
From the share equation in (4), a measure of input bias<br />
in technological change is:<br />
(19)<br />
A η = 0 imply a neutral technical change. η> 0 and<br />
η < 0 imply ith factor-using and ith factor-saving technological<br />
advancements respectively.<br />
Technological change could also be biased with respect<br />
to the scale property of the production technology.<br />
Technological change may be scale-biased or non-neutral<br />
in the sense that it might alter the range of outputs over<br />
which a given scale economies can be attained, thus resulting<br />
in a change in the cost-minimizing efficient firm<br />
size. Define the cost elasticity to be C=1/S, S=elasticity<br />
of scale. Technological scale bias is given by:<br />
(17)<br />
An estimate of S > 1 implies scale economies, indicating<br />
that an equiproportional increase in all inputs of a<br />
(20)<br />
A TSB > 0, implies that technological change increases<br />
scale economies and, conversely,<br />
58 Need the Dough July-October - 2007