12.01.2015 Views

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

india going global.indd - The IIPM Think Tank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESEARCH<br />

βQ = 0. (12)<br />

Finally, a Cobb-Douglas specification implies, in addition<br />

to (5), (6) and (7), the following restriction:<br />

βij = βiQ = 0. (13)<br />

Pindyck (1976) states that we can test restrictions using<br />

a simple chi-square test <strong>The</strong> appropriate test statistic<br />

is :<br />

-2 log C = n (log Ω* r - log Ω* u) (14)<br />

where, IΩ*rI and IΩ*uI are the determinants of the<br />

estimated error covariance<br />

matrices for the restricted and unrestricted models respectively.<br />

This statistic is distributed as chi-square with<br />

degrees of freedom equal to the number of parameter<br />

restrictions being tested.<br />

To characterize the nature of the production process<br />

further as represented by the cost functions, the study<br />

also estimates the Allen elasticities of substitution and<br />

elasticities of conditional input demands. From the cost<br />

and share equations, the measures of the Allen elasticities<br />

of substitutions are defined as:<br />

σij = βij/Si*Sj - 1/Si + 1 , for i = j, (15a)<br />

Where Si = cost share of input i<br />

σij = βij/Si*Sj + 1 for i ≠ j (15 b)<br />

<strong>The</strong> related own- and cross-partial elasticities of conditional<br />

input demand are given by:<br />

εij = βij/Si + Si - 1 , for i = j, and (16 a)<br />

εij = βij/Si + Sj , for i ≠ j. (16 b)<br />

Estimation of Economies of Scale:<br />

Economies of scale are said to exist if an increase in<br />

output, holding input prices constant, leads to a less than<br />

proportional increase in total costs, causing a decline<br />

in average costs. When two firms merge the size of the<br />

firm rises proportionally. If internal management of the<br />

combined firms improves and\or the synergies unlock,<br />

these will manifest in scale of economies in the same<br />

way as defined here. From the translog cost function<br />

stated in equation (3) above, returns to scale measuring<br />

cost responses resulting from changes in output, post<br />

merger holding input prices constant, can be derived<br />

as follows:<br />

firm result in a more than proportional increase in output.<br />

Evidence of scale economies, other things constant,<br />

could be a rationale for M & A activity.<br />

Investigation of synergy and technological Change<br />

It is well known fact in economics that a change in<br />

output holding the quantity and cost of inputs constant<br />

can occur if there is a change in technology. This concept<br />

has been employed in the present study in the context of<br />

evaluation of M&A. unlocking of synergies and improvement<br />

in internal management practices will be manifest<br />

in the significant technology coefficient of the cost function<br />

specified in the equation (3) above. Specifically, from<br />

the cost side, holding input prices constant, technological<br />

change permits the firm to produce the same level of<br />

output at lower expenditure. Given the cost function in<br />

(3), the rate of technological change can be measured<br />

by:<br />

Where<br />

= rate of technological change<br />

(18)<br />

Technological change can be biased with respect to inputs<br />

as well as with respect to the scale characteristics of<br />

the production technology. With regard to input biases,<br />

a technological change is Hicks-neutral, if the slope of<br />

the production isoquants is independent of technological<br />

change. A cost-neutral technological change, an analogous<br />

(but not equivalent) concept, refers to a technical<br />

change that does not affect relative cost shares of inputs.<br />

From the share equation in (4), a measure of input bias<br />

in technological change is:<br />

(19)<br />

A η = 0 imply a neutral technical change. η> 0 and<br />

η < 0 imply ith factor-using and ith factor-saving technological<br />

advancements respectively.<br />

Technological change could also be biased with respect<br />

to the scale property of the production technology.<br />

Technological change may be scale-biased or non-neutral<br />

in the sense that it might alter the range of outputs over<br />

which a given scale economies can be attained, thus resulting<br />

in a change in the cost-minimizing efficient firm<br />

size. Define the cost elasticity to be C=1/S, S=elasticity<br />

of scale. Technological scale bias is given by:<br />

(17)<br />

An estimate of S > 1 implies scale economies, indicating<br />

that an equiproportional increase in all inputs of a<br />

(20)<br />

A TSB > 0, implies that technological change increases<br />

scale economies and, conversely,<br />

58 Need the Dough July-October - 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!