Measuring Achievements of Private Sector Development in ... - DCED
Measuring Achievements of Private Sector Development in ... - DCED
Measuring Achievements of Private Sector Development in ... - DCED
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Measur<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Achievements</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Private</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>in</strong> Conflict-Affected Environments<br />
2.3 Assess<strong>in</strong>g likelihood <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able impact (Control Po<strong>in</strong>t 2.3)<br />
The <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators that assess the susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> project <strong>in</strong>terventions pushes projects to<br />
assess whether development <strong>in</strong>terventions will lead to last<strong>in</strong>g change. The unpredictability and<br />
fluctuations <strong>in</strong> CAEs makes the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability particularly important. Given the<br />
devastat<strong>in</strong>g impact that conflict can have upon the private sector, monitor<strong>in</strong>g the potential for conflict is<br />
a critical aspect <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability. The <strong>in</strong>dicators presented above can help <strong>in</strong> accomplish<strong>in</strong>g this.<br />
2.4 Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators (Control Po<strong>in</strong>t 2.4)<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the course <strong>of</strong> project implementation, changes <strong>in</strong><br />
the CAE context and project learn<strong>in</strong>g based on<br />
implementation results may both require changes to the<br />
results cha<strong>in</strong>s. This may require different or additional<br />
project <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />
Relevant to<br />
project logic<br />
A common mistake <strong>in</strong> CAEs (and elsewhere) is to<br />
overburden staff with <strong>in</strong>dicators. Ensure <strong>in</strong>dicators are<br />
relevant to the logic <strong>of</strong> your project and that there is<br />
capacity and budget to collect, analyse and use them.<br />
Hard<br />
collect<br />
to<br />
Easy<br />
collect<br />
to<br />
One way to manage this is to plot all current <strong>in</strong>dicators on<br />
a grid like the one to the right, potentially as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />
results measurement workshop. 42 Select <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong> the<br />
top right <strong>of</strong> the graph that are relevant to the project<br />
logic and easy to collect while avoid<strong>in</strong>g those <strong>in</strong> the<br />
bottom left.<br />
Irrelevant to<br />
project logic<br />
Preference<br />
Figure 4: Indicator Selection Tool<br />
Tip!<br />
Community members are <strong>of</strong>ten are best placed to understand what would represent an improvement <strong>in</strong><br />
peace <strong>in</strong> their particular context. Runn<strong>in</strong>g workshops with them can be an important source <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dicator development process. 43 For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> Nepal a community peacebuild<strong>in</strong>g<br />
project consulted community members to develop <strong>in</strong>dicators for an economic development project.<br />
They learned that be<strong>in</strong>g viewed as credit-worthy by local moneylenders was a critical early <strong>in</strong>dicator that<br />
the ultra poor had made economic ga<strong>in</strong>s. 44<br />
2.5 Projections (Control Po<strong>in</strong>ts 2.5)<br />
Predict<strong>in</strong>g the results <strong>of</strong> programme <strong>in</strong>terventions provides staff with targets and a way to assess<br />
whether <strong>in</strong>terventions are proceed<strong>in</strong>g as expected. They also enable up-front assessments <strong>of</strong> whether<br />
the expected results <strong>of</strong> specific <strong>in</strong>terventions are worth their <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />
42 RAND Europe, <strong>in</strong>terview September 25, 2012.<br />
43 Sartorius, Rolf and Christopher Carver. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g, Evaluation and Learn<strong>in</strong>g for Fragile States and Peacebuild<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Programs: Practical Tools for Improv<strong>in</strong>g Program Performance and Results, undated, 44.<br />
44 McGrew, Laura, Community Peace build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Nepal: Lessons Learned, 2006, 11.<br />
Practical Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Implement<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>DCED</strong> Standard. Version 2, July 2013<br />
26