16.01.2015 Views

0 - Eureka Street

0 - Eureka Street

0 - Eureka Street

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mentions only a few of the most important<br />

reformers in passing, failing to recognise<br />

several other significant Muslim leaders<br />

who have emerged more recently. For<br />

example, there is no mention in Esposito's<br />

bibliography of a remarkable collection<br />

of essays written by a group of progressive<br />

Muslim authors (Progressive Muslims,<br />

on Ju stice, Gender, and Pluralism ,<br />

edited by Omid Safi, Oxford, Oneworld,<br />

2004). First published in 2003, these essays<br />

were, according to the editor, a response<br />

to the events of 9/ 11 and would have contributed<br />

to an analysis of the basic issue<br />

Esposito himself describes in the preface<br />

of his own book (revised two years later,<br />

in 2005) as 'a new clash in the 21st century<br />

between Islam and Western civilisation'.<br />

Awareness of the thinking of these<br />

progressive Muslims would have brought<br />

Esposito's book up to date. Bereft of these<br />

reflections, the book tends to over-simplify<br />

Muslim attitudes to change, reducing<br />

them to four categories, namely:<br />

'secularist, conservative, neotraditionalist<br />

(or neofundamentalist), and reformist<br />

(neomodernist)'. This classification no<br />

longer caters for the diverse approaches to<br />

reform in Islam that are emerging in the<br />

modern world, especially in<br />

response to the events of 9/ 11.<br />

I N STEAD OF DELVING into the 1nore recent<br />

efforts at reform in Islam, the author tends<br />

to repeat summaries of earlier Muslim<br />

reformers. For example, he sums up a<br />

prevalent attitude that prefers to remain<br />

satisfied with past formulations as a 'taqlid<br />

mentality'. The phrase becomes a repetitive<br />

cliche when it is used again and again<br />

without further elaboration. Similarly,<br />

with regard to the status of non-Muslim<br />

minorities, he refers to their 'protected<br />

status', resorting to the standard phrase<br />

used in most introductions to Islam rather<br />

than exploring some of the more recent<br />

Muslim views on the issue. Esposito may<br />

rightly counter by saying that his book<br />

is simply a short history of Islam. I have<br />

hinted at some of the oversimplifications<br />

and inadequacies of such a short history.<br />

The book remains useful as a balanced<br />

introduction to the generally accepted<br />

fundamentals of what is commonly known<br />

as Islam.<br />

•<br />

Herman Roborgh ST is engaged at Aligarh<br />

Muslim University, India, in research for<br />

a PhD in Islamic studies on a modern<br />

commentary on the Qur'an.<br />

NOVEMBER- DECEMBER 2005 EURE KA STREET 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!